Background: The prevalence of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has increased with continued evidence of their efficacy and ease of use. However, the rise in their utilization also surfaced a concern regarding their reversal in patients actively bleeding and/or those requiring invasive procedures. Up until 2018, there were several reversal options available including 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4-factor PCC), activated charcoal, desmopressin, and tranexamic acid. Then, in 2018, andexanet alpha, a recombinant factor Xa, was approved for the reversal of apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients with life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding. Nonetheless, because 4-factor PCC is more easily attainable and cost-effective, it continues to be the more favorable option for many health-care professionals. Methods: This retrospective chart review was conducted at NYU Winthrop Hospital in patients who received 4-factor PCC for the reversal of DOACs from January 2018 to July 2018. Patient charts were reviewed and relevant data was collected (admitting diagnosis, dose of 4-factor PCC utilized, etc). Results: Fifty-three patients were evaluated with 85% experiencing a positive response and complete recovery following the administration of 4-factor PCC; 8 (15%) patients died after receiving 4-factor PCC, none as a result of its administration; 3 patients died secondary to other underlying comorbidities, 4 patients died due to an intracranial hemorrhage, and 1 died due to hematoma of the tongue. Conclusion: Based on the results thus far, the use of 4-factor PCC may be a good treatment option in patients requiring DOAC reversal.
Background Tocilizumab is an IL-6 receptor inhibitor that has been utilized for the prevention and treatment of the cytokine storm inflammatory reaction in COVID-19. The objectives of this analysis were to evaluate clinical outcomes of tocilizumab treatment in relation to respiratory status improvements and to analyze the association between initial inflammatory markers and treatment outcomes. Methods IRB approved retrospective chart review of adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab from March- May 2020. Data collection focused on relevant past medical history, hematologic and inflammatory markers before and after tocilizumab administration, concomitant COVID-19 treatments, and disease outcomes such as mortality and discharge. Assessed baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients who received tocilizumab prior to intubation versus after intubation, and evaluated for any significant markers of treatment success and failure. Results 84 patients were evaluated. Baseline characteristics did not vary between intubated and not intubated patients (Figure 1). Overall mortality in patients who received an IL-6 inhibitor was 43%. Mortality in patients who received IL-6 inhibitor when intubated (63%) compared to patients who were not intubated (26%) was significantly higher (p = 0.005). Patients with BMI’s of 30 or above and patients with diabetes had a higher rate of treatment failure (p < 0.05) (Figure 2). Patients with IL-6 levels of 1000 or above had higher rates of treatment failure (p = 0.0001); however, given the small sample size larger studies are required for further analysis (Figure 3). Baseline Characteristics by Respiratory Status Pre-Tocilizumab Administration Subgroup Analysis Outcome by Baseline IL-6 Levels Conclusion Overall mortality in our patients was 43%; however, our sample size was small and the study did not have a control group to fully assess treatment success or failure. Comorbidities such as diabetes and obesity, and elevated IL-6 levels were associated with significantly higher rates of treatment failure. Randomized control trials are needed to determine the true benefit of tocilizumab in COVID-19. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.