IntroductionTreatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections are limited and CRE infections remain associated with high clinical failure and mortality rates, particularly in vulnerable patient populations. A Phase 3, multinational, open-label, randomized controlled trial (TANGO II) was conducted from 2014 to 2017 to evaluate the efficacy/safety of meropenem–vaborbactam monotherapy versus best available therapy (BAT) for CRE.MethodsA total of 77 patients with confirmed/suspected CRE infection (bacteremia, hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia, complicated intra-abdominal infection, complicated urinary tract infection/acute pyelonephritis) were randomized, and 47 with confirmed CRE infection formed the primary analysis population (microbiologic-CRE-modified intent-to-treat, mCRE-MITT). Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to meropenem–vaborbactam (2 g/2 g over 3 h, q8h for 7–14 days) or BAT (mono/combination therapy with polymyxins, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, tigecycline; or ceftazidime-avibactam alone). Efficacy endpoints included clinical cure, Day-28 all-cause mortality, microbiologic cure, and overall success (clinical cure + microbiologic eradication). Safety endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and laboratory findings.ResultsWithin the mCRE-MITT population, cure rates were 65.6% (21/32) and 33.3% (5/15) [95% confidence interval (CI) of difference, 3.3% to 61.3%; P = 0.03)] at End of Treatment and 59.4% (19/32) and 26.7% (4/15) (95% CI of difference, 4.6% to 60.8%; P = 0.02) at Test of Cure;.Day-28 all-cause mortality was 15.6% (5/32) and 33.3% (5/15) (95% CI of difference, − 44.7% to 9.3%) for meropenem–vaborbactam versus BAT, respectively. Treatment-related AEs and renal-related AEs were 24.0% (12/50) and 4.0% (2/50) for meropenem–vaborbactam versus 44.0% (11/25) and 24.0% (6/25) for BAT. Exploratory risk–benefit analyses of composite clinical failure or nephrotoxicity favored meropenem–vaborbactam versus BAT (31.3% [10/32] versus 80.0% [12/15]; 95% CI of difference, − 74.6% to − 22.9%; P < 0.001).ConclusionsMonotherapy with meropenem–vaborbactam for CRE infection was associated with increased clinical cure, decreased mortality, and reduced nephrotoxicity compared with BAT.Clinical Trials RegistrationNCT02168946.FundingThe Medicines Company.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40121-018-0214-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
CRKP should be regarded as an emerging clinical threat. Because these isolates are resistant to virtually all commonly used antibiotics, control of their spread is crucial.
during extensive hospital construction and indoor renovation, a nosocomial outbreak of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis occurred in acute leukemia patients treated in a regular ward that has only natural ventilation. The observed infection rate was 50%. Chemoprophylaxis with intravenous continuous low-dose amphotericin B was then instituted as a preventive measure. During the next 18 months invasive pulmonary aspergillosis developed in 43% of acute leukemia patients. After that period a new hematology ward was opened with an air filtration system through high-efficiency particulate air filtration (HEPA) filters, and a bone marrow transplantation program was started on the hematology service. During the following three years, none of the acute leukemia or bone marrow transplantation patients who were hospitalized exclusively in the hematology ward developed invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, although 29% of acute leukemia patients who were housed in a regular ward, because of shortage of space in the new facility, still contracted invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Overall, 31 patients were diagnosed with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis during almost five years: 74% of patients recovered from invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, and 42% are long-term survivors; 26% of patients died of resistant leukemia with aspergillosis, but no one died of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis alone. In conclusion, during an on-going construction period, an extremely high incidence rate of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in acute leukemia patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy was observed. Institution of low-dose intravenous amphotericin B prophylaxis marginally reduced the incidence rate of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Keeping patients in a special ward with air filtration through a HEPA system eliminated invasive pulmonary aspergillosis completely. Among patients who developed invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, early diagnosis and treatment are probably the explanation for the favorable outcome. Am. J. Hematol. 66:257-262, 2001.
Candida species have emerged as frequent causes of nosocomial bloodstream infection (BSI) in association with well-defined risk factors, including prolonged hospitalization, abdominal surgery, antibiotic treatment, neutropenia and central venous catheterization (14). Candidemia is associated with high rates of attributable mortality, prolongation of hospital stay, and excessive costs (28). In recent years, there has been a shift in the distribution of Candida species causing invasive infection, with non-albicans species now surpassing Candida albicans in many institutions (14,25). Of particular concern is the rising incidence of the azolenonsusceptible species C. glabrata and the inherently fluconazoleresistant species C. krusei (11,25,27).Fluconazole is often used as empirical treatment of candidemia. However, given the correlation between the survival rate and the timely initiation of appropriate treatment for candidemia (8), accurate assessment of the risk of fluconazole-resistant Candida (FRC) BSI is of prime importance. Patients who were recently treated with an azole drug are at increased risk of infection with FRC (9) and should be treated initially with an echinocandin agent according to current guidelines (18). However, experimental and clinical data support the notion that nonantifungal antimicrobial agents also affect the risk of colonization and infection with FRC (15,17,22). Since exposure to antibacterial drugs among at-risk patients far exceeds exposure to antifungal agents, even modest effects of individual antibacterials could translate into significant overall changes in the susceptibility patterns of Candida spp. Nevertheless, the collateral effects of antibacterial drugs on Candida spp. are poorly understood. To address this question, we analyzed prospectively collected data from a nationwide study of candidemia in Israel and examined the association between exposure to antifungal and antibacterial agents and the risk of infection with FRC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design.We performed a prospective nationwide study of candidemia in Israel from November 2005 through June 2007. Eighteen medical centers, which together account for 75% of the hospital beds in Israel, were included. All candidemia episodes that occurred in the participating centers during the study period were eligible for inclusion in this study. Clinical data were prospectively entered into standardized data forms by on-site investigators at each of the centers. The Candida sp. clinical isolates underwent preliminary identification and susceptibility testing in each center according to local practices. Subsequently, the isolates were transferred together with the corresponding data forms to the central study site, where species identification and susceptibility testing were performed as detailed below. The data forms were collected by the study coordinator, reviewed by the principal investigator, and entered into a computerized database. The study was approved by the ethics committee of each of the participating centers.Data...
This study demonstrated a significant adjusted association between CRGNB and mortality up to 1 year among haemato-oncological patients receiving chemotherapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.