The results of performances in competitions of different ranks of judokas in the weight category up to 55 kg for five years were analyzed. The analysis of competition protocols was carried out in order to determine the scope and effectiveness of competitive activities, to determine the all-Ukrainian and world ranking of athletes, to determine the strongest athletes in judo, sports results. The protocols of: Ukrainian championships were analyzed; Cups of Ukraine; European Championships; World Championships; European Cups and Grand Slam Helmet for 2017-2021 years.The results of the performances of 51 athletes who competed since 2017 (CHU-18) in the weight category of 55 kg and took part in 65 competitions, including 22 competitions of championships and Cups of Ukraine and 43 competitions of international championships and European Cups during his sports career. According to the results of the performances, the following indicators of judokas were analyzed according to their performances at competitions: results of judokas' performances at competitions of different ranks in Ukraine; results of judokas' performances at competitions abroad; the number of judokas who continued their careers in cadet, junior, youth, and adulthood separately; transition of judokas to other weight categories; increase the sports title over the years. In 5 years, more than half of judokas (70.6%) have completed their sports careers. To date, 15 out of 51 judokas continue to perform in competitions of various ranks. The ratio of judokas who took part in competitions and judokas who became prize-winners and winners tends to improve over the years. For 5 years 14 judokas competed abroad in various competitions, in 2017 - 8 athletes (1 prize-winner - 12.5%), in 2018 - 13 judokas (2 prize-winners - 15.4%), in 2019 - 7 athletes from them (2 prize-winners - 28.6%), 2020 - 1 judoka and (1 prize-winner - 100%), 2021 - 4 judokas of them (1 prize-winner - 25%).
Purpose: with the help of a questionnaire, to analyze the criteria for evaluating judo judges for performance indicators at competitions. Material and methods. During the research the following methods were used: theoretical analysis and generalization of literature sources, Internet data, questionnaires, generalization of theoretical and practical experience of specialists in the field of martial arts, methods of mathematical statistics. A questionnaire survey of judo judges was conducted. The study involved 30 judo judges of the international category (3 men – 10 %) of the national category (15 people – 50 %) and the first category (12 people – 40 %). Results: the analysis of the conducted survey of judo judges on the basis of 50 evaluation criteria for the performance of judges in competitions revealed the main 11 criteria that are in the opinion of most experts the most effective. Thus, 11 criteria were distributed among specialists of international, national and first categories of judges as follows: in the first place - professional ethics and discipline 1,33; in second place - the appearance of 1,66; in third place - knowledge of the rules and the ability to use them 3,66; in fourth place - is the clarity of commands and gestures 4,66; in fifth place - moving on the tatami and choosing the correct position 5,00; in sixth place - interaction with judges 6,67; in seventh place - the ability to correctly and timely assess errors 7.66; in eighth place - the ability to accurately and timely assess technical actions 8,00; in ninth place - psychological stability 8,33; in tenth place - the reaction to the situation 8,66; on the eleventh place - the ability to use technical means 10,33. Conclusions. Thus, the survey of judges' categories from the 50 proposed criteria revealed 11 most practical criteria by which it is possible to evaluate the work of judges in competitions. As a result of the questionnaire survey, most experts put professional ethics and discipline in the first place; second place - appearance; third place - knowledge of the rules and the ability to use them. Keywords: judo, questionnaire, ranking, criteria, judges, professional ethics
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.