The addition of small amounts of multivalent cations to solutions containing double-stranded DNA leads to inter-DNA attraction and eventual condensation. Surprisingly, the condensation is suppressed in double-stranded RNA, which carries the same negative charge as DNA, but assumes a different double helical form. Here, we combine experiment and atomistic simulations to propose a mechanism that explains the variations in condensation of short (25 base-pairs) nucleic acid (NA) duplexes, from B-like form of homopolymeric DNA, to mixed sequence DNA, to DNA:RNA hybrid, to A-like RNA. Circular dichroism measurements suggest that duplex helical geometry is not the fundamental property that ultimately determines the observed differences in condensation. Instead, these differences are governed by the spatial variation of cobalt hexammine (CoHex) binding to NA. There are two major NA-CoHex binding modes—internal and external—distinguished by the proximity of bound CoHex to the helical axis. We find a significant difference, up to 5-fold, in the fraction of ions bound to the external surfaces of the different NA constructs studied. NA condensation propensity is determined by the fraction of CoHex ions in the external binding mode.

Charge hydration asymmetry (CHA) manifests itself in the experimentally observed strong dependence of free energy of ion hydration on the sign of the ion charge. This asymmetry is not consistently accounted for by popular models of solvation; its magnitude varies greatly between the models. While it is clear that CHA is somehow related to charge distribution within a water molecule, the exact nature of this relationship is unknown. We propose a simple, yet general and rigorous criterion that relates rotational and charge inversion properties of a water molecule’s charge distribution with its ability to cause CHA. We show which electric multipole components of a water molecule are key to explain its ability for asymmetric charge hydration. We then test several popular water models and explain why specific models show none, little, or strong CHA in simulations. We use the gained insight to derive an analogue of the Born equation that includes the missing physics necessary to account for CHA, and does not rely on re-defining the continuum dielectric boundary. The proposed formula is as simple as the original, does not contain any fitting parameters, and predicts hydration free energies and entropies of spherical cations and anions within experimental uncertainty. Our findings suggest that the gap between the practical continuum electrostatics framework and the more fundamental explicit solvent treatment may be reduced considerably by explicitly introducing CHA into the existing continuum framework.

The effect of charge hydration asymmetry (CHA)—non-invariance of solvation free energy upon solute charge inversion—is missing from the standard linear response continuum electrostatics. The proposed charge hydration asymmetric–generalized Born (CHA–GB) approximation introduces this effect into the popular generalized Born (GB) model. The CHA is added to the GB equation via an analytical correction that quantifies the specific propensity of CHA of a given water model; the latter is determined by the charge distribution within the water model. Significant variations in CHA seen in explicit water (TIP3P, TIP4P-Ew, and TIP5P-E) free energy calculations on charge-inverted “molecular bracelets” are closely reproduced by CHA–GB, with the accuracy similar to models such as SEA and 3D-RISM that go beyond the linear response. Compared against reference explicit (TIP3P) electrostatic solvation free energies, CHA–GB shows about a 40% improvement in accuracy over the canonical GB, tested on a diverse set of 248 rigid small neutral molecules (root mean square error, rmse = 0.88 kcal/mol for CHA–GB vs 1.24 kcal/mol for GB) and 48 conformations of amino acid analogs (rmse = 0.81 kcal/mol vs 1.26 kcal/mol). CHA–GB employs a novel definition of the dielectric boundary that does not subsume the CHA effects into the intrinsic atomic radii. The strategy leads to finding a new set of intrinsic atomic radii optimized for CHA–GB; these radii show physically meaningful variation with the atom type, in contrast to the radii set optimized for GB. Compared to several popular radii sets used with the original GB model, the new radii set shows better transferability between different classes of molecules.

Increasing concentration of counterions (salt) is known to reduce the bending persistence length of DNA. Here we use atomistic molecular dynamics simulations to predict that multivalent counterions have the opposite effect on double-stranded RNA, increasing its bending rigidity by at least 30%. This counter-intuitive effect is observed for various tri- and tetravalent ions alike, and is robust to methodological details and RNA sequence. In contrast to DNA, multivalent counterions bind inside the RNA major groove, causing significant contraction of the molecule along its helical axis — as a result, its further deformation due to bending becomes energetically more expensive compared to bending without bound multivalent ions. Thus, the relationship between mechanical properties of a charged polymer and its ionic atmosphere may be richer than previously thought.

Interactions between the polyamine spermine and nucleic acids drive important cellular processes. Spermine condenses DNA and some RNAs, such as poly(rA):poly(rU). A large fraction of the spermine present in cells is bound to RNA but apparently does not condense it. Here, we study the effect of spermine binding to short duplex RNA and DNA, and compare our findings with predictions of molecular-dynamics simulations. When small numbers of spermine are introduced, RNA with a designed sequence containing a mixture of 14 GC pairs and 11 AU pairs resists condensation relative to DNA of an equivalent sequence or to 25 bp poly(rA):poly(rU) RNA. A comparison of wide-angle x-ray scattering profiles with simulation results suggests that spermine is sequestered deep within the major groove of mixed-sequence RNA. This prevents condensation by limiting opportunities to bridge to other molecules and stabilizes the RNA by locking it into a particular conformation. In contrast, for DNA, simulations suggest that spermine binds externally to the duplex, offering opportunities for intermolecular interaction. The goal of this study is to explain how RNA can remain soluble and available for interaction with other molecules in the cell despite the presence of spermine at concentrations high enough to precipitate DNA.