In an effort to better compare particular gas turbine diagnostic solutions and recommend the best solution, the software tool called Propulsion Diagnostic Method Evaluation Strategy (ProDiMES) has been developed. This benchmarking platform includes a simulator of the aircraft engine fleet with healthy and faulty engines. The platform presents a public approach, at which different investigators can verify and compare their algorithms for the diagnostic stages of feature extraction, fault detection, and fault identification. Using ProDiMES, some different diagnostic solutions have been compared so far. This study presents a new attempt to enhance a gas turbine diagnostic process. A data-driven algorithm that embraces the mentioned three diagnostic stages is verified on the basis of ProDiMES. At the feature extraction stage, this algorithm uses a polynomial model of an engine baseline to compute deviations of actual gas path measurements from the corresponding values of a healthy engine. At the fault detection and fault identification stages, a common classification for fault detection and fault identification is firstly constructed using deviation vectors (patterns). One of the three chosen pattern recognition techniques then performs both fault detection and fault identification as a common process. Numerous numerical experiments have been conducted to select the best configurations of the baseline model, a pertinent structure of the fault classification, and the best recognition technique. The experiments were accompanied by a computational precision analysis for each component of the proposed algorithm. The comparison of the final diagnostic ProDiMES metrics obtained under the selected optimal conditions with the metrics of other diagnostic solutions shows that the proposed algorithm is a promising tool for gas turbine monitoring systems.
Efficiency of gas turbine monitoring systems pri marily depends on the accuracy of employed algorithms, in particular, pattern classification techniques for diag nosing gas path faults. In recent investigations many tech niques have been applied to classify gas path faults, but recommendations for selecting the best technique for real monitoring systems are still insufficient and often con tradictory. In our previous work, three classification tech niques were compared under different conditions of gas turbine diagnosis. The comparative analysis has shown that all these techniques yield practically the same accu racy for each comparison case. The present contribution considers a new classification technique, Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN), and we compare it with the tech niques previously examined. The results for all compari son cases show that the PNN is not inferior to the other techniques. We recommend choosing the PNN for real monitoring systems because it has an important advan tage of providing confidence estimation for every diagnos tic decision made.
Considering the importance of continually improving the algorithms in aircraft engine diagnostic systems, the present paper proposes and benchmarks a gas-path monitoring and diagnostics framework through the Propulsion Diagnostic Methodology Evaluation Strategy (ProDiMES) software developed by NASA. The algorithm uses fleet-average and individual engine baseline models to compute feature vectors that form a fault classification with healthy and faulty engine classes. Using this classification, a hybrid fault-recognition technique based on regularized extreme learning machines and sparse representation classification was trained and validated to perform both fault detection and fault identification as a common process. The performance of the system was analyzed along with the results of other diagnostic frameworks through four stages of comparison based on different conditions, such as operating regimes, testing data, and metrics (detection, classification, and detection latency). The first three stages were devoted to the independent algorithm development and self-evaluation, while the final stage was related to a blind test case evaluated by NASA. The comparative analysis at all stages shows that the proposed algorithm outperforms all other diagnostic solutions published so far. Considering the advantages and the results obtained, the framework is a promising tool for aircraft engine monitoring and diagnostic systems.
In modern gas turbine health monitoring systems, the diagnostic algorithms based on gas path analysis may be considered as principal. They analyze gas path measured variables and are capable of identifying different faults and degradation mechanisms of gas turbine components (e.g. compressor, turbine, and combustor) as well as malfunctions of the measurement system itself. Gas path mathematical models are widely used in building fault classification required for diagnostics because faults rarely occur during field operation. In that case, model errors are transmitted to the model-based classification, which poses the problem of rendering the description of some classes more accurate using real data. This paper looks into the possibility of creating a mixed fault classification that incorporates both model-based and datadriven fault classes. Such a classification will combine a profound common diagnosis with a higher diagnostic accuracy for the data-driven classes.A gas turbine power plant for natural gas pumping has been chosen as a test case. Its real data with cycles of compressor fouling were used to form a data-driven class of the fouling. Preliminary qualitative analysis showed that these data allow creating a representative class of the fouling and that this class will be compatible with simulated fault classes.A diagnostic algorithm was created based on the proposed classification (real class of compressor fouling and simulated fault classes for other components) and artificial neural networks. The algorithm was subjected to statistical testing. As a result, probabilities of a correct diagnosis were determined. Different variations of the classification were considered and compared using these probabilities as criteria. The performed analysis has revealed no limitations for realizing a principle of the mixed classification in real monitoring systems.'Telephone and fax
Gas turbine health monitoring includes the common stages of problem detection, fault identification, and prognostics. To extract useful diagnostic information from raw recorded data, these stages require a preliminary operation of computing differences between measurements and an engine baseline, which is a function of engine operating conditions. These deviations of measured values from the baseline data can be good indicators of engine health. However, their quality and the success of all diagnostic stages strongly depend on the adequacy of the baseline model employed and, in particular, on the mathematical techniques applied to create it.To create a baseline model, we have applied polynomials and the least squares method for computing the coefficients over a long period of time. Methods were proposed to enhance such a polynomial-based model. The resulting accuracy was sufficient for reliable monitoring of gas turbine deterioration effects. The polynomials previously investigated thus far are used in the present study as a standard for evaluating artificial neural networks, a very popular technique in gas turbine diagnostics. The focus of this comparative study is to verify whether the use of networks results in a better description of the engine baseline. Extensive field data for two different industrial gas turbines were used to compare these two techniques under various conditions. The deviations were computed for all available data, and the quality of the resulting deviation plots was compared visually. The mean error of the baseline model was used as an additional criterion for comparing the techniques. To find the best network configurations, many network variations were realised and compared with the polynomials. Although the neural networks studied were found to be close to the polynomials in accuracy, they did not exceed the polynomials in any variation. In this way, it seems that polynomials can be successfully used for engine monitoring, at least for the gas turbines analysed herein.
The aim of this study is to evaluate gas path diagnostic techniques using a principle of variable structure classification applied to cover possible fault scenarios in gas turbine maintenance. This principle allows creating more versatile and realistic fault conditions relative to existing studies such as complex fault classifications, a new boundary for fault severity, and real deviation errors. The techniques analyzed are included into a special procedure that repeats a diagnostic process many times and computes for each fault class a probability of correct diagnosis. Using this probability averaged for all the classes as the evaluation criterion, the techniques are tested under the conditions of four comparative studies. The results show that (a) there is no single technique significantly outperforming all others over the full range of diagnostic conditions even if engine operating modes, fault simulation data, fault classifications, multiple-class boundaries or the scheme of deviation errors are varied; (b) the common level of diagnosis accuracy greatly depends on the fault classification used; (c) significant influence of fault severity boundary is found. The boundary proposed makes the level of accuracy much more realistic compared to simplified boundaries previously used; and (d) the use of real deviation noise in fault class description instead of simulated errors further approaches the diagnostic conditions and results to the level expected in practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.