The optimum pressure ratio for the stages of a multistage compression process is calculated with a well known formula that assigns an equal ratio for all stages, based on the hypotheses that all isentropic efficiencies are also equal. Although the derivation of this formula for two stages is relatively easy to find, it is more difficult to find for any number of stages, and the examples that are found in the literature employ complex mathematical methods. The case when the stages have different isentropic efficiencies is only treated numerically. Here, a step by step derivation of the general formula and of the formula for different stage efficiencies are carried out using Lagrange multipliers. A main objective has been to maintain the engineering considerations explicitly, so that the hypotheses and reasoning are clear throughout, and will enable the readers to generalise or adapt the methodology to specific problems. As the actual design of multistage compression processes frequently meet engineering restrictions, a practical example has been developed where the previous formulae have been applied to the design of a multistage compression plant with reciprocating compressors. Special attention has been put into engineering considerations.
In this work, an evaluation and quantification of the impact of using mixtures based on supercritical carbon dioxide “s-CO2” (s-CO2/COS, s-CO2/H2S, s-CO2/NH3, s-CO2/SO2) are made as a working fluid in simple and complex recompression Brayton s-CO2 power cycle configurations that have pressure drops in their components. These cycles are coupled with a solar thermal plant with parabolic-trough collector (PTC) technology. The methodology used in the calculation performance is to establish values of the heat recuperator total conductance (UAtotal) between 5 and 25 MW/K. The main conclusion of this work is that the cycle’s efficiency has improved due to using s-CO2 mixtures as working fluid; this is significant compared to the results obtained using the standard fluid (pure s-CO2). Furthermore, a techno-economic analysis is carried out that compares each configuration’s costs using pure s-CO2 and a mixture of s-CO2/COS with a molar fraction (70/30), respectively, as working fluid where relevant results are obtained. These results show that the best configuration in terms of thermal efficiency and cost is the RCC-RH for pure sCO2 with values of 41.25% and 2811 $/kWe, while for the mixture sCO2/COS, the RCC-2RH configuration with values of 45.05% and 2621 $/kWe is optimal. Using the mixture costs 6.75% less than if it is used the standard fluid (s-CO2).
Industrial nitrogen liquefaction cycles are based on the Collins topology but integrate variations. Several pressure levels with liquefaction to medium pressure and compressor–expander sets are common. The cycle must be designed aiming to minimise specific power consumption rather than to maximise liquid yield. For these reasons, conclusions of general studies cannot be extrapolated directly. This article calculates the optimal share of total compressed flow to be expanded in an industrial Collins-based cycle for nitrogen liquefaction. Simulations in Unisim Design R451 using Peng Robinson EOS for nitrogen resulted in 88% expanded flow, which is greater than the 75–80% for conventional Collins cycles with helium or other substances. Optimum specific compression work resulted 430.7 kWh/ton of liquid nitrogen. For some operating conditions, the relation between liquid yield and specific power consumption was counterintuitive: larger yield entailed larger consumption. Exergy analysis showed 40.3% exergy efficiency of the optimised process. The exergy destruction distribution and exergy flow across the cycle is provided. Approximately 40% of the 59.7% exergy destruction takes place in the cooling after compression. This exergy could be used for secondary applications such as industrial heating, energy storage or for lower temperature applications as heat conditioning.
The first results of a new line of research are presented, focused on producing rocket propulsion based upon the chemical reaction of two of the most abundant and affordable substances in nature: water and sodium. We have chosen SWR (Sodium Water Reaction) as a fuel candidate for an advanced propellant because of its excellent energetic properties, the absence of polluting products and the simplicity of sodium synthesis process, resulting in a new clean and sustainable energy source for rocket science that facilitates the replacement of current expensive and toxic reactants with a natural low‐cost renewable fuel. We have accomplished the characterization of the Sodium Water Reaction as a function of the nature of the reactants and the geometry of the reactor, including the assessment of the performance in a dedicated device.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.