In the light of rapidly increasing applications of large-eddy simulations (LES), it is deemed necessary to impose some quality assessment measures for such studies. The verification of LES calculations is difficult because of the fact that both the subgrid scale (SGS) model contribution and numerical discretization errors are functions of the grid resolution. In this study, various indexes of quality measures, hereafter referred to as LES̱IQ, are proposed. The recommended LES̱IQ is based on the Richardson extrapolation concept. This method has been applied to various cases and the calculated LES̱IQ results are compared with the relative total experimental and direct numerical simulation (DNS) error, defined as IQ̱EX and IQ̱DNS, respectively. It is postulated that in practical applications of LES, numerical dissipation will always be a significant part of the overall dissipation, and it must be accounted for in any assessment of the quality of LES. It is further suggested that LES̱IQ of 75% to 85% can be considered adequate for most engineering applications that typically occur at high Reynolds numbers; the proposed index is an indicator of good resolution (i.e., verification), but not necessarily a good or accurate model (i.e., validation).
While engineering applications of the large eddy simulation (LES) technique are becoming a common reality in many branches of engineering and science, its application to engine flows has lagged behind due to the relatively more complex nature of both the flow and the geometry relevant to in-cylinder flows. In this paper a review of the limited number of LES applications to engine flows is given, and most significant results from these studies are presented. Also, the LES formulation appropriate for engine applications is briefly described, along with the main characteristics of in-cylinder flows. As expected, engine applications of LES are not of the so-called ‘high-fidelity’ type, but rather they employ formally second-order accurate numerical schemes in conjunction with finite volume formulation. The subgrid scale (SGS) models used are also kept as simple as possible, mostly using a variant of the Smagorinsky model. Nevertheless, this review reveals that even with relatively coarse grids, LES captures much more interesting features of in-cylinder flows, such as the large coherent vortical flow structures developed during the intake stroke. In the opinion of the present authors, a low-resolution LES provides a better solution than RANS (Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes) with moderate grid resolution because the important features of flow dynamics cannot be reproduced in RANS due to the high level of non-physical diffusion. Of course, some overheads in computational costs must be paid for this benefit obtained from LES.
Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were used to predict the flow field and resulting worker exposures when toxic airborne contaminants were released into the wake region of a mannequin that had its back to the airflow while holding the source of airborne contaminants. The effects of ventilation velocity, free-stream turbulence, and various thermal conditions on fluid flow and exposure levels were evaluated. The results showed good agreement between predicted and experimental concentrations at the mouth at a broad range of airflow velocities when the mannequin was both heated and unheated. When the mannequin was unheated, the exposure level decreased as the ventilation velocity increased. The expectation that buoyancy provided by the heat from the mannequin would be most important at very low velocities and decreasingly important at high velocities was proved true for both the predicted and observed exposures. The result was that when the mannequin was heated to normal human body temperatures, exposure levels had an inverted V relationship with velocity. These findings are important, since they call into question the common practice of modeling human exposures with mannequins at ambient temperatures. In addition, free-stream turbulence could be used to reduce worker exposure to airborne pollutants as suggested by the simulations. CFD enabled a detailed investigation of the effect of particular factors for exposure predictions in a cost-effective way.
Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulations are used to investigate the distribution and level of contaminant concentrations in the true breathing zone (at the nose and mouth) when toxic airborne contaminants are released within an arm's length in front of the worker who has his back to the airflow. The effects of different body shapes on fluid flow and concentration patterns around the body in a wind tunnel were evaluated and clarified that a sharp body or a block may not be a good surrogate for the human form in consideration of occupational and environmental health studies. The comparison of the concentration field calculated with the Eulerian and Lagrangian methods revealed that the Eulerian method has a more diffusive nature than the Lagrangian method. The concentrations at different locations were also compared to determine the optimum sampling location. It was found that the concentration at the breathing zone may be significantly different from the one at the chest area. The influence of the heat flux from the body was studied at two different Reynolds numbers. Predictions indicate that the heat flux may have a significant impact on exposure especially when the convection induced by buoyancy dominates the flow.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.