No abstract

This study was carried in BSMMU from July 2001 to June 2003. During the study period, 60 pregnant women were studied. Thirty patients were preeclamptic and thirty were normal healthy pregnant women served as control. Serum lipoprotein(a) was found significantly higher in preeclamptic women 56.63±22.6 mg/dl and found within limit in normal healthy pregnant women, 12.89±4.59mg/dl. Result is statistically highly significant (P<0.001). Mean Systolic Blood Pressure was 163.33±29.63 mmHg and 117.00±11.19mmHg in case and control and Diastolic Blood Pressure was 108.53±14.54 mmHg and 76.00±6.87mmHg respectively in case and control group. Result was highly significant as P <0.001. The mean (±SD) serum lipoprotein(a) concentration in normal pregnancies and preeclampsia were found to be 12.91±4.94 and 56.65±22.62. Moderate Proteinuria was found in 77.5% and severe proteinuria in 22.2% cases of preeclampsia respectively. Regardless of mechanism and pathophysiology of preeclampsia, we found high serum level of lipoprotein (a) in preeclampsia patients. These high levels of lipoprotein (a) significantly correlated with blood pressure and proteinuria. DOI: 10.3329/bmrcb.v36i3.7289Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2010; 36: 97-99

Background: Bacteria responsible for causing lncisional Surgical Site Infection (ISSI) along with their resistance pattern changes over time due to various factors and are a matter of regular scrutiny. Proper understanding of this will help both surgeon and microbiologist to formulate an effective guideline to combat overall SSI. Objectives: To evaluate responsible microorganisms and their resistance pattern causing ISSI following elective gastrointestinal surgery in our perspective. Methods: Prospective data were collected on 1122 surgical patients admitted in the surgery department in BSMMU from January 201 O to June 2012 having elective gastrointestinal surgery. Patients operated were followed in the post operative period till discharge and if any ISSI noted, swab from the site of infection was sent for culture and sensitivity reporting using standard bacteriological techniques. Antibiotics were given accordingly. Results: In this series 1122 wounds were studied of which183(16.31%) cases had ISSI.Wound infection rates, according to clinical wound types were 10.45%, 14.49%, 49% for clean-contaminated,contaminated and dirty wounds respectively. The figures of ISSI according to SSI types were 76.77% for Superficial SSI and 26.23% for Deep SSI.The figures of ISSI according to SSI types were 76.77% for Superficial SSI and 26.23% for Deep SSI. Causative microorganisms were revealed in 74.87% positive cultures. 5.8% wounds had polymicrobial etiology. The common causative organisms were Escherichia coli 55.5%,Staphylococcus aureus 22.6%, Pseudomonas spp. 9.5% and Klebsiella spp. 6.6%.AII were 100% sensitive to Meropenem. Next to this Escherichia coli and Klebsiellaspp. were mostly sensitive to Ceftriaxone 62.5% and 100% respectively, Staphylococcus aureus to Doxicycline 75% and Pseudomonas spp. to Ceftazidime 93.7%. Comparison with previously done national and international studies revealed alarming increase in resistance pattern of causative bacterial isolates. Conclusion: To date no national or in house SSI prevention policy or surveillance guideline exists. Lack of our attention in this issue along with inept, irrational use of antibiotics is definitely adding causative organisms to gain increasing resistance pattern. Before surgical care centers are overwhelmed with SSls by resistant organisms caution must be taken from all level. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2013) Vol. 17 (1) : 18-24

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, initially considered a contraindication for the treatment of acute gallbladder disease, is now being practiced for treating acute cholecystitis worldwide. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic procedure in the management of acute gallbladder disease during the index admission in terms of safety and feasibility, hospital stay and the rates of complications and conversion to open cholecystectomy.

Results: Male to female ratio was 3.76:1 with median age of 35 years (range: 11-90 years). Median hospital stay was 2 days (24 hours-5 days) and longest 5 days after operation. 14 patients had 1 st degree haemorrhoids, 66 patients had 2 nd degree haemorrhoids, 104 patients had 3 rd degree haemorrhoids and 16 patients had 4 th degree haemorrhoids. Median time for the procedure was 25 minutes. Urgency of defecation was complained by 46 patients who ultimately felt comfortable within 2-4 weeks. 6 patients complained of annorectal pain who responded to conventional analgesics. Rest of the patients available after 8 weeks follow up were found to be fully satisfied. Conclusion:Contrary to open haemorrhoidectomy this procedure is associated with least chance of anal incontinence because of preservation of normal anal cushion. It can safely be concluded that stapled haemorrhoidopexy is a better option in treating primary haemorrhoidal disease.