Objective The burden of caregiving for persons with epilepsy (PWEs) has not been examined previously in the United States. We assessed the clinical impact and direct and indirect economic costs for caregivers of PWEs. Methods An internet survey of 500 caregivers of PWEs was conducted from May to July 2015 using a combination of validated instruments and questions designed specifically for this survey. Caregivers were stratified by PWE age (adult/child) and disease severity (low: 0 vs high: 1 + seizures in the prior month). Annual self‐reported direct and indirect costs were reported per caregiver and extrapolated to all US caregivers. The economic burden of caregiving for PWEs was defined as the difference between costs for caregivers and the general population. Results Caregivers reported that PWEs averaged 11.4 seizures in the prior month. Eighty percent of respondents were female and the average age was 44.3. Since becoming a caregiver, many reported anxiety (52.8%), depression (41.0%), and insomnia (30.8%). Annual mean direct medical costs for caregivers of children with low vs high seizure frequency were $4344 and $10 162, respectively. Costs for caregivers of adult PWEs were $4936 and $8518. Mean indirect costs associated with caregiving for a child with low vs high seizure frequency were $20 529 and $40 137; those for caregivers of an adult were $13 981 and $28 410. The cost estimates are higher vs the general US population; annual per‐person healthcare utilization costs were $2740 and productivity loss costs were $5015. When extrapolating to the US population of PWE caregivers, annual costs exceeded $62 billion vs $14 billion for the general population, resulting in a caregiver burden of nearly $48 billion. Significance The clinical and economic burden of caregivers for PWE were substantial, and greatest for those caring for children with frequent seizures. The impact on caregivers should be considered when estimating the value of interventions that control epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Drugs for inflammatory conditions are one of the highest expenditure therapeutic classes for health plans.

Introduction: We compared treatment switch patterns and healthcare costs among biologicnaive patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who initiated apremilast or biologics. Methods: A 1:2 propensity score match was used to adjust administrative claims data for adults initiating apremilast or biologics from January 1, 2014, to September 30, 2016, for possible selection bias. Patients had at least 12 months of pre-and post-index continuous enrollment in the Optum Clinformatics TM Data Mart database. Outcomes included switch frequency, days to switch, adherence on index treatment, and healthcare costs (total and per patient per month). Switch rate was defined as the proportion of patients who switched to a new treatment after initiation of the index Enhanced Digital Features To view enhanced digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/ m9.figshare.11830302.

Aim: Treatment switching and healthcare costs were compared among biologic-naive psoriasis patients initiating apremilast or biologics with ≥12 months pre-/post-index continuous enrollment in Optum Clinformatics™ Data Mart. Methods: After propensity score matching, switch rates (new therapy post-index) and days between index and switch were assessed. Total and per-patient per-month costs by service type were assessed. Results: Apremilast initiators (n = 533) were matched and compared with biologic initiators (n = 955). Twelve-month cumulative switch rates and days to switch were similar. Apremilast initiators had significantly lower total healthcare costs than biologic initiators; apremilast switchers and nonswitchers had significantly lower per-patient per-month costs than biologic switchers and nonswitchers, driven mainly by reduced outpatient pharmacy costs. Conclusion: Apremilast initiators had lower healthcare costs even with treatment switching.

Introduction Topical therapies are considered first-line treatment in the management of plaque psoriasis (PSO). However, data on patient-reported outcomes for topicals are scarce. We designed a survey to record the treatment experience of patients with mild-to-moderate PSO using prescription topicals. Methods An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among adult patients on prescription topicals for mild-to-moderate PSO (body surface area [BSA] ≤ 10%) in the US. Data on treatment goals, changes in PSO after current treatment, satisfaction with current treatment (assessed with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication [TSQM]), and treatment adherence (how often current treatment was taken as instructed) were collected. Descriptive analysis was used to evaluate outcomes. Results Of the 175 patients with mild-to-moderate PSO who completed the survey, 67.4% were female, with a median age of 55.0 years and 10.8 years since PSO diagnosis. Patients reported (medians) the use of three topicals since diagnosis, with 5 years on the current prescription topical. The top three treatment goals for current topical treatment were improvements in visible skin, 97.1%; non-skin related symptoms, 62.9%; and social/emotional well-being, 60.0%. Overall, 43.4% of patients reported 0% BSA change and 5.7% reported ≥ 75% BSA reduction. Approximately 75.0% each reported improvement in itch and pain symptoms. Embarrassment/self-consciousness because of skin symptoms persisted in 72.6% of patients. Median TSQM scores for global satisfaction, convenience, and effectiveness ranged between 58 and 72, indicating partial treatment satisfaction, except for side effects, which was high (median: 100). Approximately half of patients (49.7%) reported not being highly adherent to treatment. Conclusion Contrary to their treatment goals, patients with mild-to-moderate PSO using prescription topicals reported partial effectiveness, incomplete symptom resolution, impacted emotional and social well-being, and suboptimal global satisfaction, effectiveness, adherence, and convenience. Our findings highlight several unmet needs among topical-experienced, systemic-naïve patients with mild-to-moderate PSO using prescription topicals.