No abstract

Background Potential Drug–Drug Interactions (DDI) account for many emergency department visits. Polypharmacy, as well as herbal, over-the-counter (OTC) and combination medication may compound this, but these problems are not well researched in low-and-middle-income countries. Objective To compare the incidence of drug–drug interactions and polypharmacy in older and younger patients attending the Emergency Department (ED). Setting The adult ED of a tertiary teaching hospital in Trinidad. Methods A 4 month cross sectional study was conducted, comparing potential DDI in older and younger patients discharged from the ED, as defined using Micromedex 2.0. Main outcome measure The incidence and severity of DDI and polypharmacy (defined as the use of ≥5 drugs simultaneously) in older and younger patients attending the ED. Results 649 patients were included; 275 (42.3%) were ≥65 years and 381 (58.7%) were female. There were 814 DDIs, of which 6 (.7%) were contraindications and 148 (18.2%) were severe. Polypharmacy was identified in 244 (37.6%) patients. Older patients were more likely to have potential DDI (67.5 vs 48.9%) and polypharmacy (56 vs 24.1%). Herbal products, OTC and combination drugs were present in 8, 36.7 and 22.2% of patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, polypharmacy and the presence of hypertension and ischaemic heart disease were associated with an increased risk of potential DDI. Conclusion Polypharmacy and potential drug–drug interactions are common in ED patients in the Caribbean. Older patients are particularly at risk, especially as they are more likely to be on multiple medications. The association between herbal medication and polypharmacy needs further investigation. This study indicates the need for a more robust system of drug reconciliation in the Caribbean.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11096-017-0520-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

With population aging, “do not resuscitate” (DNAR) decisions, pertaining to the appropriateness of attempting resuscitation following a cardiac arrest, are becoming commoner. It is unclear from the literature whether using age to make these decisions represents “ageism.” We undertook a systematic review of the literature using CINAHL, Medline, and the Cochrane database to investigate the relationship between age and DNAR. All 10 studies fulfilling our inclusion criteria found that “do not attempt resuscitation” orders were more prevalent in older patients; eight demonstrated that this was independent of other mediating factors such as illness severity and likely outcome. In studies comparing age groups, the adjusted odds of having a DNAR order were greater in patients aged 75 to 84 and ≥85 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.25, 2.33] and 2.96, 95% CI = [2.34, 3.74], respectively), compared with those <65 years. In studies treating age as a continuous variable, there was no significant increase in the use of DNAR with age (AOR 0.98, 95% CI = [0.84, 1.15]). In conclusion, age increases the use of “do not resuscitate” orders, but more research is needed to determine whether this represents “ageism.”

No abstract