Background Plants alter their environment in a number of ways. With correct management, plant communities can positively impact soil degradation processes such as surface erosion and shallow landslides. However, there are major gaps in our understanding of physical and ecological processes on hillslopes, and the application of research to restoration and engineering projects.Scope To identify the key issues of concern to researchers and practitioners involved in designing and implementing projects to mitigate hillslope instability, we organized a discussion during the From this discussion, ten key issues were identified, considered as the kernel of future studies concerning the impact of vegetation on slope stability and erosion processes. Each issue is described and a discussion at the end of this paper addresses how we can augment the use of ecological engineering techniques for mitigating slope instability. Conclusions We show that through fundamental and applied research in related fields (e.g., soil formation and biogeochemistry, hydrology and microbial ecology), reliable data can be obtained for use by practitioners seeking adapted solutions for a given site. Through fieldwork, accessible databases, modelling and collaborative projects, awareness and acceptance of the use of plant material in slope restoration projects should increase significantly, particularly in the civil and geotechnical communities.

No abstract

In New Zealand poplars are commonly planted on moist, unstable pastoral hill country to prevent or reduce soil erosion, thereby maintaining hillslope integrity and pasture production. Mechanical reinforcement by poplar root systems aids slope stabilisation. Root mass and distribution were determined for three Populus deltoides · nigra 'Veronese' trees aged 5, 7 and 9.5 year planted as 3 m poles at 8 m · 8 m spacing on a hillslope near Palmerston North in the southern North Island. Most of the structural roots ( ! 2 mm diameter) were distributed in the top 40 cm of soil. Vertical roots penetrated to about 1.0 m, being the depth of the soil above a fragipan. Total structural root dry masses (excluding root crown) were 0.57, 7.8 and 17.90 kg for the trees aged 5, 7 and 9.5 year, respectively. Total structural root length was 79.4 m for the 5 year tree and 663.5 m for the 9.5 year tree. Surrounding trees were estimated to increase root mass density to 3 times and root length density to 4-5 times the contribution of the single tree at 9.5 year. The study indicated that root development of wide-spaced poplar trees on hillslopes was minimal in the first 5 years but then increased rapidly. These results suggest that poplar trees established from poles may take at least 5 years to develop a structural root network that will effectively bind soil.

This chapter provides a practical worldwide overview of the environmental applications of poplars and willows. The chapter aims to synthesize the latest knowledge on these applications with respect to sustainable livelihoods, land use and restoration. The applications covered include land protection, watershed stabilization, waste management and other ecosystem services.

Spaced poplar (Populus spp.) trees are used widely in New Zealand for soil conservation on erodible pastoral hill country. Their root distribution in this environment, and factors that affect it, are poorly understood. Robust recommendations on effective tree spacing depend on knowledge of root systems. This study determined the effect of tree density, position between trees, and soil depth (0-90 cm) on root number, root diameter distribution, root area ratio (RAR), and cross sectional area per root for young trees on slopes. Data were collected for lateral roots using trenches. Greater than 80% of roots were < 5 mm diameter and root attributes were highest in shallow soil. Trees at 770 stems per hectare (sph) had 3-12 times more roots and 3-9 times greater RAR than those at densities of ≤ 237 sph, representative of most tree-pasture systems. Mean cross sectional area per root was similar across densities. Positions close to trees had twice as many roots (46 vs. 23/m 2 ) and RAR (109 vs. 52 mm 2 /m 2 ) as positions midway between trees. The study provided quantitative understanding of variation in root distribution with tree density and information useful for supporting and strengthening recommendations on densities for effective erosion control.