A study into the sensitivity and accuracy of a standardized radiographic technique for the disclosure of root resorption cavities was performed in a cadaver material. Film contrast and horizontal angulation were varied in order to identify factors in radiographic exposure which resulted in the greatest diagnostic reliability. In an autopsy material of 5 jaw blocks containing both mandibular premolars, “small, medium and large” cavities simulating root resorptions of 0.6, 1.2 and 1.8 mm in diameter and 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9 mm in depth, respectively, were drilled at the cervical, middle and apical thirds of the proximal and oral root surfaces of the premolars. Cavity locations were distributed to ensure an equal number of locations with and without cavities and an equal number of cavities of each size. Results of the investigation indicated that the small cavities were never visualized, nor were 6 out of 13 medium cavities nor 1 out of 13 large cavities; that cavities located proximally were more readily seen than those located orally and that there was no clif Terence in cavity visualization between cavities on the apical, middle or cervical thirds of the roots; high density (contrast) films allowed the best cavity visualization. Finally, radiographs from the time of injury (i.e. preresorption radiographs) as well as radiographs taken at various horizontal angulations were found to be of importance in order to increase the possibility of cavity visualization.

Dentin-bonded RP applied onto the entire, slightly concave resection surface is a predictable apical sealant characterized by a high success rate. In contrast, retrograde root filling with CS results in an unacceptably high failure rate due to insufficient bonding strength to the concave resection surface.

No abstract

– Radiographic assessment of marginal bone height is included in longitudinal control of osseointegrated implants. Previous studies have revealed a mean annual loss of less than 0.1 mm. The purpose of the present study was by means of an experimental model to analyze the influence upon alveolar bone height measures around osseointegrated implants of buccolingual bone dimensions as well as angulations of fixture axis to central X‐ray beam. Brånemark titanium implants were inserted into acrylic test blocks simulating alveolar ridges of various widths. 0.2 mm steel wires visualized buccal and lingual bone margins. Standardized radiographs were obtained by stepwise variation of projection angles. Separation of the wire images varied from 0.1 mm (buccolingual width 5 mm and 1° angulation) to 4.8 mm (width 13 mm and angulation 20°). In clinical cases distortion of buccal and lingual bone margins may result in overestimation of bone heights. The degree of overestimation is influenced by the buccolingual position of the fixture. Strict parallelism between fixture axes and film plane is essential to obtain valid results using single films.

No abstract