No abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) is a highly reactive gas that has been suggested to function as a neurotransmitter in the neuroendocrine system. In this work, we have evaluated the role of NO pathways in growth hormone (GH) secretion by assessing the effect of L-arginine infusion, a precursor of NO formation, and L-NAME, a nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor. The experiments were carried out on 7 adult beagle dogs. A saline infusion was carried out on all the dogs as a control test. L-arginine (infusion i.v. 10 g in 100 ml of saline, from t = 0 to 30 min) and L-nitro-arginine-methyl ester, L-NAME (infusion of 300 µg/kg in 120 ml of saline, from t = –30 to 45 min) were administered alone and together with growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) (i.v. bolus at 0 min, at a dose of 100 µg), the synthetic GH secretagogue GHRP-6 (i.v. bolus at 0 min, at a dose of 90 µg), and the 5-HT1D serotonin receptor agonist sumatriptan, SUM (s.c. injection at the dose of 3 mg). Plasma cGH was determined by RIA. Results were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance, followed by the Newman-Keuls test for multiple comparisons. L-arginine administration resulted in a slight increase in plasma cGH in comparison with saline controls. Combined administration of L-arginine and GHRH enhanced cGH release in comparison with GHRH alone. L-NAME alone did not modify baseline cGH levels, but completely suppressed the GH release induced by GHRH or GHRP-6. It also strongly reduced, but did not abolish the effect of the two peptides (GHRH plus GHRP-6) administered together. Finally, administration of the 5-HT1D agonist SUM induced a significant cGH secretion in all dogs, a response which was not modified when L-NAME was administered in combination with SUM. In conclusion, our data show that inhibition of NO blunts both GHRH or GHRP-6-induced cGH release, and are compatible with the hypothesis that it acts by decreasing hypothalamic somatostatin release.

Cell therapy can be considered as a new alternative to the treatment of post-traumatic syringomyelia, achieving reduction of syrinx and clinical improvements in individual patients.

The role of serotonin (5-HT) in the regulation of growth hormone (GH) secretion remains unclear due to the existence of many different receptors that mediate the 5-HT actions, and the lack of suitable specific agonist and antagonist drugs. In the present work we have taken advantage of the recent development of new selective 5-HT drugs in order to clarify the role played by different 5-HT receptor types and subtypes on GH secretion. The experiments were carried out on beagle dogs. GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) increased basal canine GH (cGH) levels from 0.8 ± 0.2 to 8.8 ± 1.7 µg/l at 15 min. Administration of 5-HT_1D receptor agonist sumatriptan (SUM) induced a cGH peak at 30 min of 12.9 ± 2.7 µg/l. The combined administration of GHRH plus SUM strikingly potentiated cGH release with a peak of 36.9 ± 6 µg/l at 30 min (p < 0.05). Pretreatment with the muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine completely abolished the cGH response to SUM, while the cholinergic agonist pyridostigmine (PYR) did not modify this response (15.3 ± 5 µg/l PYR plus SUM vs. SUM alone 12.9 ± 2.7 µg/l). On the other hand, administration of drugs with activity at 5-HT_2A/C receptors showed a stimulatory role for the 5-HT_2C receptor subtype, since LY-53857 (antagonist 5-HT_2A/C) and DOI agonist (5-HT_2A/C) both modified the GH response stimulated by GHRH (AUC 88.5 ± 30.4 and 400 ± 64.6 vs. 267.3 ± 52.6 respectively), while ketanserin (antagonist 5-HT_2A) did not modify this response. The 5-HT₃ antagonist ICS-205–930 failed to modify either basal or GHRH induced GH responses. In conclusion, our data show that 5-HT_1D receptors play a stimulatory role on GH secretion in the dog, possibly by acting through a decrease in hypothalamic somatostatin release. Similarly, the 5-HT_2C receptor subtypes also appear to play a stimulatory role. However, 5-HT_2A and 5-HT₃ receptors do not appear to be involved in the control of basal and GHRH-induced GH secretion.

Introduction Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has rapidly emerged as a novel approach for rectal cancer surgery. Safety profiles are still emerging and more comparative data is urgently needed. This study aimed to compare indications and short‐term outcomes of TaTME, open, laparoscopic, and robotic TME internationally. Methods A pre‐planned analysis of the European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) 2017 audit was performed. Patients undergoing elective total mesorectal excision (TME) for malignancy between 1 January 2017 and 15 March 2017 by any operative approach were included. The primary outcome measure was anastomotic leak. Results Of 2579 included patients, 76.2% (1966/2579) underwent TME with restorative anastomosis of which 19.9% (312/1966) had a minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or robotic) which included a transanal component (TaTME). Overall, 9.0% (175/1951, 15 missing outcome data) of patients suffered an anastomotic leak. On univariate analysis both laparoscopic TaTME (OR 1.61, 1.02–2.48, P = 0.04) and robotic TaTME (OR 3.05, 1.10–7.34, P = 0.02) were associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leak than non‐transanal laparoscopic TME. However this association was lost in the mixed‐effects model controlling for patient and disease factors (OR 1.23, 0.77–1.97, P = 0.39 and OR 2.11, 0.79–5.62, P = 0.14 respectively), whilst low rectal anastomosis (OR 2.72, 1.55–4.77, P < 0.001) and male gender (OR 2.29, 1.52–3.44, P < 0.001) remained strongly associated. The overall positive circumferential margin resection rate was 4.0%, which varied between operative approaches: laparoscopic 3.2%, transanal 3.8%, open 4.7%, robotic 1%. Conclusion This contemporaneous international snapshot shows that uptake of the TaTME approach is widespread and is associated with surgically and pathologically acceptable results.

Background Laparoscopy has now been implemented as a standard of care for elective colonic resection around the world. During the adoption period, studies showed that conversion may be detrimental to patients, with poorer outcomes than both laparoscopic completed or planned open surgery. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether laparoscopic conversion was associated with a higher major complication rate than planned open surgery in contemporary, international practice. Methods Combined analysis of the European Society of Coloproctology 2017 and 2015 audits. Patients were included if they underwent elective resection of a colonic segment from the caecum to the rectosigmoid junction with primary anastomosis. The primary outcome measure was the 30‐day major complication rate, defined as Clavien‐Dindo grade III‐V. Results Of 3980 patients, 64% (2561/3980) underwent laparoscopic surgery and a laparoscopic conversion rate of 14% (359/2561). The major complication rate was highest after open surgery (laparoscopic 7.4%, converted 9.7%, open 11.6%, P < 0.001). After case mix adjustment in a multilevel model, only planned open (and not laparoscopic converted) surgery was associated with increased major complications in comparison to laparoscopic surgery (OR 1.64, 1.27–2.11, P < 0.001). Conclusions Appropriate laparoscopic conversion should not be considered a treatment failure in modern practice. Conversion does not appear to place patients at increased risk of complications vs planned open surgery, supporting broadening of selection criteria for attempted laparoscopy in elective colonic resection.

Introduction The mainstay of management for locally advanced rectal cancer is chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection. Following chemoradiotherapy, a complete response may be detected clinically and radiologically (cCR) prior to surgery or pathologically after surgery (pCR). We aim to report the overall complete pathological response (pCR) rate and the reliability of detecting a cCR by conventional pre‐operative imaging. Methods A pre‐planned analysis of the European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) 2017 audit was performed. Patients treated by elective rectal resection were included. A pCR was defined as a ypT0 N0 EMVI negative primary tumour; a partial response represented any regression from baseline staging following chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the pCR rate. The secondary endpoint was agreement between post‐treatment MRI restaging (yMRI) and final pathological staging. Results Of 2572 patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery in 277 participating centres across 44 countries, 673 (26.2%) underwent chemoradiotherapy and surgery. The pCR rate was 10.3% (67/649), with a partial response in 35.9% (233/649) patients. Comparison of AJCC stage determined by post‐treatment yMRI with final pathology showed understaging in 13% (55/429) and overstaging in 34% (148/429). Agreement between yMRI and final pathology for T‐stage, N‐stage, or AJCC status were each graded as ‘fair’ only (n = 429, Kappa 0.25, 0.26 and 0.35 respectively). Conclusion The reported pCR rate of 10% highlights the potential for non‐operative management in selected cases. The limited strength of agreement between basic conventional post‐chemoradiotherapy imaging assessment techniques and pathology suggest alternative markers of response should be considered, in the context of controlled clinical trials.

Background Individuals with a non-syndromic family history of colorectal cancer are known to have an increased risk. There is an opportunity to prevent early-onset colorectal cancer (age less than 50 years) (EOCRC) in this population. The aim was to explore the proportion of EOCRC that is preventable due to family history of colorectal cancer. Methods This was a retrospective multicentre European study of patients with non-hereditary EOCRC. The impact of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), U.S. Multi-Society Task Force (USMSTF), and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines on prevention and early diagnosis was compared. Colorectal cancer was defined as potentially preventable if surveillance colonoscopy would have been performed at least 5 years before the age of diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and diagnosed early if colonoscopy was undertaken between 1 and 4 years before the diagnosis. Results Some 903 patients with EOCRC were included. Criteria for familial colorectal cancer risk in ESGE, USMSTF, and NCCN guidelines were met in 6.3, 9.4, and 30.4 per cent of patients respectively. Based on ESGE, USMSTF, and NCCN guidelines, colorectal cancer could potentially have been prevented in 41, 55, and 30.3 per cent of patients, and diagnosed earlier in 11, 14, and 21.1 per cent respectively. In ESGE guidelines, if surveillance had started 10 years before the youngest relative, there would be a significant increase in prevention (41 versus 55 per cent; P = 0.010). Conclusion ESGE, USMSTF, and NCCN criteria for familial colorectal cancer were met in 6.3, 9.4, and 30.4 per cent of patients with EOCRC respectively. In these patients, early detection and/or prevention could be achieved in 52, 70, and 51.4 per cent respectively. Early and accurate identification of familial colorectal cancer risk and increase in the uptake of early colonoscopy are key to decreasing familial EOCRC.