Two experiments were conducted to determine the compensatory responses of pig to feed restriction during the growth period. Eighty Dalland pigs (40 boars and 40 gilts) and 60 Large White × (Large White × Landrace) barrows were used in two different experiments. They were slaughtered at 97 and 122 kg. During the restriction period, the animals were restricted by 46% and 25% of their ad libitum consumptions in experiment 1 and 2 respectively. The restriction periods lasted 28 and 35 days respectively. Considering the whole study period, in experiment 1 the average daily weight gain and food intake were lower for restricted pigs compared to those fed ad libitum: 762 vs 856 g (P < 0.03) and 2147 vs 2396 g (P < 0.08). However, the feed conversion ratio was no different: 2.83 vs 2.80 g g-1 (P < 0.81). In this experiment, the interaction treatment x sex was not significant in either test. When performance over the total period was examined in experiment 2 (moderate restriction), a stronger trend was seen towards a greater average daily weight gain in groups with restricted access to feed (853 vs 821 g in those fed ad libitum, P < 0.11). No significant differences were observed for average daily feed intake, feed conversion ratio and dorsal fat thickness (measured at the 14th rib by ultrasound) (2638 vs 2635 g, 3.09 vs 3.2 g g-1 and 16,9 vs 16.2 mm respectively).
The efficiency of manure separation by a conveyor belt under a partially slatted floor for fattening pigs was determined for two types of belts, a fíat belt with an incline of up to 6° transversely and a concave belt with an incline of up to 1° longitudinally. A 31.20% and 23.75% dry matter content of the solid fraction was obtained for the fíat and concave belt, respectively. The fíat belt was more efficient at 6° than other slope angles. The residence time of the manure on the two belt types influenced the separation efficiency from a Uve weight of 63.00 kg upwards. The quantity of residue produced with this system was _ .
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.