A ntarctic krill Euphausia superba, a key species in Southern Ocean food webs 1 , plays a central role in ecosystem processes and community dynamics of apex predators, and is the target of a commercial fishery 2 . Krill spawn in late spring and their larvae develop during summer, autumn and under the ice in winter to emerge as juveniles in the following spring. The newly spawned eggs sink from the surface to up to 1,000 m depth where they hatch and the developing larvae actively swim upwards to feed in the upper water column 1 . Larval Antarctic krill have low lipid reserves, which are insufficient to support long periods of starvation. Therefore, winter, when primary production is minimal, is assumed to be a critical bottleneck for larval krill development and hence recruitment to the adult population 3,4 . Present hypotheses suggest that high algal biomass in winter sea ice enhances larval krill winter-feeding conditions and growth [5][6][7][8] . This implies that larvae have access to this high algal biomass within the sea ice. However, recent observations 9,10 indicate that the linkage between sea ice and krill recruitment success is not as direct as has been suggested. The timing of ice-edge advance and annual ice-season duration is highly variable, and does not necessarily show a clear link to krill recruitment in the following year ( Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). Along the Antarctic Peninsula, adult krill have a five to six year population cycle with oscillations in biomass exceeding an order of magnitude 9 . According to bioenergetics models, part of the variability is due to interannual variation in reproductive output 11 as well as autumn blooms that may govern the possible overwinter survival rate of larvae 11,12 . In the Bransfield Strait, three krill winter surveys have shown that krill abundance is an order of magnitude higher than in summer, regardless of concurrent sea-ice conditions 10 A dominant Antarctic ecological paradigm suggests that winter sea ice is generally the main feeding ground for krill larvae. Observations from our winter cruise to the southwest Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean contradict this view and present the first evidence that the pack-ice zone is a food-poor habitat for larval development. In contrast, the more open marginal ice zone provides a more favourable food environment for high larval krill growth rates. We found that complex under-ice habitats are, however, vital for larval krill when water column productivity is limited by light, by providing structures that offer protection from predators and to collect organic material released from the ice. The larvae feed on this sparse ice-associated food during the day. After sunset, they migrate into the water below the ice (upper 20 m) and drift away from the ice areas where they have previously fed. Model analyses indicate that this behaviour increases both food uptake in a patchy food environment and the likelihood of overwinter transport to areas where feeding conditions are more favourable in spring.

The variation in phytoplankton community as a response to improving water quality has been studied in the severely polluted Golden Horn Estuary (GHE). Phytoplankton data collected monthly for 4 years and a detailed set of environmental parameters clearly showed the remarkable change in the GHE. The GHE ecosystem did not respond to numerous rehabilitation efforts to improve water quality, unless strict measures were taken to enhance water circulation. The opening of a bridge operating on large buoys and release of high amounts of fresh water from a dam acted as the turning point for the whole system. The weakening of light limitation and anoxia at upper regions is followed by consecutive blooms of different species/groups and resulted in supersaturated dissolved oxygen concentrations and a significant decrease in nutrient concentrations. When compared to the pre-remediation period, average total eukaryotic phytoplankton abundance increased 11-fold in the lower estuary, while the increase in the upper estuary was over 3×10 4 in the post-remediation period. In addition, species richness continuously increased through the study period and community structure showed very strong variability. Since the estuarine ecosystem is controlled by precipitation in the last decade, the increase in anthropogenic/terrestrial inputs following heavy rainfall had adversely affected water quality and phytoplankton.

Distribution of potentially harmful microalgae and algal blooms were investigated at monthly and weekly time scales between October 2009 and September 2010 in the Golden Horn, a eutrophic estuary in the Sea of Marmara (Turkey). Several physical and chemical parameters were analysed together with phytoplankton composition and abundance. A total number of 23 potentially harmful and/or bloom-forming microalgae (14 dinoflagellates, 4 diatoms and 5 phytoflagellates) were identified throughout this study period, of which nine taxa have been confirmed to be toxic elsewhere in the world. Most harmful species and algal blooms were observed in late spring and summer particularly in the middle and upper estuaries, and nine taxa formed dense and successive algal blooms causing water discoloration. Nutrient concentrations increased significantly from the lower to the upper estuary. Additionally, high organic matter loads in the upper estuary could also have benefited by mixotrophic species. The increasing number of potentially harmful and bloom-forming species and algal blooms indicated that the GHE is a potential risk area for future HABs.

No abstract