Stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) allows specific histopathologic diagnoses to be made without surgery and has been demonstrated to be an accurate, cost-effective method of diagnosing breast disease, particularly nonpalpable lesions. However, recent studies have concluded that the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) by means of SCNB has resulted in nearly equal odds that a coexisting malignant lesion will be missed. Furthermore, others have concluded that SCNB diagnosed as DCIS cannot reliably indicate the absence of tumor invasion in surgical excision. Between 1993 and 1998, 1,221 consecutive SCNB of mammographically identified lesions were performed using a 14-gauge automated device with an average of 5.3 cores obtained per lesion. ADH was identified in 19 (1.6%) lesions and DCIS in 89 (7.3%). Surgical biopsy was performed in 89 of these patients and histopathologic results from SCNB and surgical biopsies were reviewed and correlated. In 12 cases of ADH diagnosed by SCNB, surgical biopsy showed ADH in 8 (67%) cases and DCIS in the other 4 (33%) cases. In 77 cases of DCIS diagnosed by SCNB, a surgical biopsy showed DCIS in 55 (71%) cases, 6 more cases (8%) had DCIS with focal microinvasion, and 15 (19%) had invasive ductal carcinoma. In one case no residual tumor was found at surgery. In the author's patient population, the diagnosis of ADH at SCNB indicates high probability of DCIS or residual ADH in the surgical biopsy. The diagnosis of DCIS at SCNB is confirmed in the majority of surgical biopsies; however, a significant number of cases may show microinvasion or invasive carcinoma.
Melanoma is the most common malignant tumor in which melanin synthesis occurs, although other nonmelanocytic tumors synthesize melanin or contain nonneoplastic melanocytes. We present two cases of infiltrating pigmented squamous cell carcinoma of the skin and review the clinical, morphologic, and ultrastructural features. Melanin was found in epithelial tumor cells as well as in macrophages and dendritic melanocytes. Interestingly, one of the neoplasms was associated with an adjacent melanocytic nevus and pigmented solar keratosis. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that neoplastic cells stained for keratin and melanin-filled dendritic cells were found to be S-100 protein and HMB45 positive. A careless examination of the immunohistochemical stains for S-100 protein and HMB45 could cause the misdiagnosis of melanoma, a neoplasm that has a more ominous outlook.
The objective of this study was to assess the usefulness of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy (LCNB) in the management of nonpalpable breast lesions (NBL) and compare it with stereotactic fine-needle aspiration biopsy (SFNA) performed simultaneously in a significant number of cases. From November 1993 through June 1997, 510 consecutive patients with NBL underwent 14-gauge LCNB with 354 women undergoing simultaneous 21-gauge SFNA in the same lesson. Mammographic findings lesion size, number of core biopsy specimens, complications and diagnoses of both techniques were analysed. Surgical biopsy, tumorectomy or mastectomy was indicated for malignancy or poor correlation between SFNA or LCNB results and clinical or radiological findings. Values of diagnostic accuracy of both LCNB and SFNA were determined. The ratio benign surgical biopsies/malignant surgical biopsies (BB/CB) of the series was calculated. A total of 171 patients underwent surgical treatment: in 31 (18.1%) a benign process or atypical ductal hyperplasia was the final diagnosis. The ratio BB/CB was 0.22. Sensitivity and specificity were 93.2 and 100%, respectively, for LCNB, and 77.2 and 92.3%, respectively, for SFNA with cytological analysis. Large-core needle biopsy provides more accurate diagnosis than SFNA in the management of nonpalpable breast lesions and obviates a surgical diagnostic procedure in a significant number of cases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.