This paper systematizes the basics of digital economy and describes them as potential building blocks for manufacturing. It analyzes the state-of-the-art of digitalization in the Russian Federation as well as how it manifests itself in manufacturing. Analysis of industrial innovation identifies the reasons why the manufacturing sector lags behind with respect to digitalization; the paper further sets forth the objectives, accomplishing which will bolster industrial innovation. The present study has discovered the basic technological trends applicable to the digitalization of industrial enterprises; additive manufacturing is the crucial aspect here. The paper presents individual positive exmaples of how Russian enterprises have managed to put the Industry 4.0 concept into good use. Revolutionizing the whole structure of Russian manufacturing requires developing and implementing innovative business models, above all the next-gen digital platforms. To facilitate the innovative development of Russian industrial enterprises, this paper substantiates the need for their cooperation that is both catalyzed by, and results in, digitalization of processes and business processes. The article structure the innovative cluster as a complex of blocks for research, education, production, infrastructure, and coordination. What distinguishes a cluster is that is is innovation-focused, whereas end-to-end digitalization supports generating the value added for the enterprises in the cluster. The paper also presents a mechanism that an innovative cluster could use to keep running efficiently in the light of end-to-end digitalization.
Аннотация. Внедрение принципов устойчивого развития в практику проектного управления служит инструментом для реализации ценностно-ориентированной стратегии. Целью статьи является определение ключевых задач для формирования единой прозрачной методологической базы, включающей инструменты и методы проектного управления, учитывающие принципы концеп-ции устойчивого развития. В статье рассмотрены ключевые аспекты, в которых может рассма-триваться соприкосновение концепции устойчивого развития и теории проектного управления. Такими аспектами являются, во-первых, реализация проектов, направленных непосредственно на достижение целей в области устойчивого развития, и, во-вторых, реализация любых проектов, но с учетом подходов, заложенных в устойчивом развитии. Авторами рассмотрены противоречия между управлением проектами и концепцией устойчивого развития. Наиболее веские противо-речия, требующие научной проработки, лежат в области целей, приоритетов проекта, периода и географии его оценки, анализа зон его влияния. Выявлены задачи, решение которых необходимо для разрешения выявленных противоречий и внедрения принципов социально-ответственного бизнеса. Кроме того, статья обобщает существующие наработки в области интеграции концепции ПРОБЛЕМЫ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ В ТЕРРИТОРИАЛЬНЫХ СИСТЕМАХИгорь Николаевич ИВАНОВ доктор экономических наук, профессор Государственный университет управления 109542, Россия, г. Москва, Рязанский проспект, д. 99, ivanov-igor-nik@mail.ru
The article is devoted to the issues of combination of the most important components of the theory of sustainable development and the principles of project management. The current state of the problem has been analyzed, the lack of knowledge on the corresponding issues in national literature and practice has been indicated, the rare use of sustainable development elements in project management has been identified. The prerequisites for the involvement of sustainable development objectives in the components of project management have been examined. Achieving the defined purpose is possible through the implementation of projects that aim to take into account the interests of sustainable development, as well as through the implementation of other projects that include the objectives of sustainable development. Critical inconsistencies in methodological approaches to the accomplishment of the objectives of sustainable development and project management have been identified. Thus, a more profound specification of the project's priorities and objectives, as well as the elaboration of time scheduling and scope of work are needed. The objectives for minimization of the identified inconsistencies as well as for rationale for the principles of corporate social responsibility provision have been defined. The assessment of the current regulatory documents in the field of project management with the focus on the involvement of sustainable development objectives has been conducted. It is pointed out that the corresponding aspects are poorly elaborated in the most well-known regulatory documents, namely, Individual Competence Baselinet (ICB), International Project Management Association (IPMA), Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK), Project Management Institute (PMI), A Guidebook of Project and Program Management for Enterprise Innovation (P2M), etc. Methodological approach to the integration of management decisions into the project management, the main components of which must be the integration of the regulations of PM into the main stages of SD, the broadening of time and geography of the project indicators, the identification of the correlations between the life-cycle of the project and product, as well as the expenses on the implementation of these projects and products and significant extension of the requirements of the project manager.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.