The basophil activation test is a highly reliable technique in the diagnosis of allergy to inhalant allergens. The sensitivity of the basophil activation test was 93.3%, and its specificity 98.4%, when using a cut-off point of 15% activated basophils as positive result.

FAST and CAST are useful for the diagnosis of allergy to pyrazolones. Its usefulness clearly increases when recent reactions are studied.

Background: The use of flow-cytometric basophil activation to different allergens has been recommended in recent years. In this study, we analyzed the diagnostic reliability of the flow-cytometric allergen stimulation test (FAST) after latex-specific stimulation in vitro. The diagnostic reliability of the technique was assessed as well as its correlation with other in vitro diagnostic parameters. Methods: 43 patients allergic to latex with a positive history and skin test participated in the study. Thirty subjects (20 of them exposed to latex) with a negative history, skin tests and serum-specific IgE determination to latex were used as controls. In FAST the percentage of basophils that express CD63 as an activation marker after in vitro stimulation with allergen (latex) is determined by flow cytometry, following double labelling with the monoclonal antibodies anti-CD63-PE and anti-IgE FITC. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficient in FAST with latex was 0.995 (p < 0.0001), which demonstrates the excellent reproducibility of this technique. Taking a cutoff point of 10% by means of ROC curves, FAST yields a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 100%. The FAST positive predictive value in latex allergy was 100% and the negative predictive value was 99.9%. We found a positive and significant correlation between FAST and specific IgE (CAP) with the histamine release test and specific sulphidoleukotriene production [cellular allergen stimulation test (CAST); p < 0.05]. Conclusions: FAST is a highly reliable technique (93% sensitivity and 100% specificity) in the in vitro diagnosis of IgE-mediated latex allergy.

No abstract

CAP inhibition showed antigenic community between lettuce and mugwort. Four protein bands from the lettuce extracts with molecular weights of 50, 43, 39 and 16 kDa exhibited IgE-binding properties.

Eosinophil granular proteins are a useful eosinophilic activation marker in asthmatic patients. In this study, the eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) levels were assessed in different stages of bronchial asthma, in 123 patients suffering from asthma, classified as mild (n =49), moderate (n = 49), and severe (n = 25), according to the International Consensus Report of Diagnosis and Treatment of Asthma, as well as in 27 healthy controls, with the aim of evaluating the importance of this protein as a severity marker in bronchial asthma, and its possible correlation with parameters such as anamnesis, respiratory function tests, and peripheral blood eosinophil count, and also with some allergologic diagnostic tests, both in vivo and in vitro. The geometric mean serum level of EPO was 9.3 +/- 11.3 ng/ml (median +/- SD) in controls, 28 +/- 37.8 ng/ml in the asthmatic patients. Depending on the asthma severity, the EPO levels were 25 +/- 30.5; 29 +/- 37.1, and 41 +/- 47.3 ng/ml in mild, moderate, and severe asthmatics, respectively, being the significant differences between the group of patients with mild and severe asthma (P < 0.001). The number of eosinophils (eos) in peripheral blood was 157 +/- 20 eos/mm3 in the controls, 334/35 eos/mm3 in mild asthmatics, 510 +/- 87 eos/mm3 in moderate asthmatics, and 658 +/- 72 eos/mm3 in severe asthmatics, with significant differences between all groups (from P < 0.05 to P < 0.001). Both the serum levels of EPO and the number of eosinophils were greater in patients with active asthma patients with inactive asthma (P < 0.001). Significant negative correlations (P < 0.001) were found between serum levels of EPO and FEV1 (rs = 0.30), MEF25-75 (rs = -0.33) and MEF50 (rs = -0.34), and a good positive correlation (rs = 0.80, P < 0.001) was found between EPO levels and the number of eosinophils in peripheral blood. We also found a significant positive correlation between eosinophil number and clinical score (rs = 0.54, P < 0.001) and between EPO levels and the mentioned score (rs = 0.46, P < 0.001).

In recent years, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) has been considered as a useful eosinophilic activation marker in asthmatic patients. In this study, serum ECP levels in different stages of bronchial asthma were evaluated. We studied 123 patients suffering from asthma, which was classified as mild (n = 49), moderate (n = 49), severe asthma (n = 25), and also 31 healthy controls. Serum ECP levels were 13.22 +/- 1.11 ng/mL (mean +/- s.e.m.) in controls, and 30.15 +/- 2.38 ng/mL in asthmatic patients. By subgroups, ECP levels were 24.23 +/- 3.37 ng/mL, 31.69 +/- 4.21 ng/mL and 37.61 +/- 4.52 ng/mL, in mild, moderate and severe asthmatic patients, respectively, being the differences among the three groups statistically significant (P < 0.01-P < 0.001). Peripheral blood eosinophil numbers were 157 +/- 20 eos/mm3 in controls, and 334 +/- 35 eos/mm3, 510 +/- 87 eos/mm3, and 658 +/- 72 eos/mm3, in mild, moderate, and severe asthmatic patients, respectively, with significant differences among all groups (P < 0.05-P < 0.001). The serum ECP levels as well as the eosinophil numbers were higher in symptomatic patients than in the asymptomatic ones (P < 0.01). Moderate negative correlations, although highly significant (P < or = 0.001), were found between serum ECP levels and forced vital capacity (FVC) (rs = -0.27), FEV1, MEF25-75 (rs = -031), and MEF50 (rs = -0.32). There was also a good positive correlation between ECP levels and peripheral blood eosinophil numbers (rs = 0.67, P < 0.001).

ECP and tryptase in serum and saliva were not useful markers for FC outcomes.