No abstract

Vaccinations rank among the most effective preventive measures for protection against infectious diseases. Advances in development, production, and control of vaccines facilitate the increasing standards of vaccine safety and tolerance. Comprehensive pre-clinical and clinical tests as well as modern manufacturing and testing methods ensure that vaccines marketed nowadays are safe. As a rule, clinical trials performed before granting the marketing authorisation identify the most frequent adverse events and these results are used to evaluate the safety of the product. Such trials can identify relatively rare adverse events, which occur with a frequency of 1:1,000 to 1:10,000 of all vaccinated individuals. These adverse events will then be included in the summary of product characteristics (SPC) for the vaccine. Even after comprehensive clinical trials of vaccines, it is possible that very rare adverse events may be observed for the first time during general use of a vaccine. In recent years concern over real and alleged risks of vaccines relative to their benefit has grown in many countries including Germany. One reason for this is the fact that most infections that were previously feared have now faded from memory. This situation can be ascribed in part to the success of vaccination. In recent years an increased awareness of substantiated and assumed risks following immunization has been reported in Germany as well as many other countries. In part this may be due to the absence of infectious disease-related mortality and morbidity and to the fact that the severity of vaccine-preventable diseases is no longer observable. Consequently, rare and hypothetical adverse events attain undue public attention. As vaccination willingness diminishes, a resulting lower vaccination rate renders the population susceptible to the natural wild type infection with concomitant increases in mortality and morbidity of vaccine-preventable diseases. Thus, very rare or even unproven adverse events have attracted public attention. Declining vaccination rates resulting from these fears may result in a renewed increase of vaccine-preventable diseases. Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) need to be recognized and adequately assessed. This review presents the scientific knowledge concerning causality and frequency of several AEFI and hypothetical risks.

Sealed and unsealed beta radiation sources come into use to a greater extent in radiation therapy, e.g. for treating inflammatory joint diseases by radiosynoviorthesis (RSO), by injecting 90Y, 186Re or 169Er-solutions. Sealed 90Sr/90Y and 32P-sources or 188Re-liquid-filled balloon catheter are applied in vascular brachytherapy. Recently, 90Y-labelled antibodies are being successfully used in radioimmunotherapy (RIT) of malign lymphoma. Such practices require handling of high activities at small distances to the skin. Thus, the medical staff may be exposed to high beta doses. Investigations of the extremity exposure were performed at several workplaces, in particular during RSO treatments. The local skin dose (LSD), Hp(0,07), was measured with thin-layer TLD (LiF:Mg,P,Cu) fixed to the fingers (TLD-tapes). The findings indicate that the exposure of the staff can exceed the annual dose limit of 500 mSv when working at low protection standard. Routine monitoring of the extremity exposures with ring dosemeters appropriate to beta radiation and provided by the approved German dosimetry services was found to be needed. But even monitoring with these official 'beta-dosemeters' does mostly not give suitable results to demonstrate compliance with the dose limit. A study was conducted at RSO-workplaces in order reveal a correlation between doses measured with ring dosemeters and the maximum LSD obtained from the TLD-tapes. The results are discussed and conclusions for routine monitoring are drawn.

No abstract

No abstract

The Work Package 4 of the ORAMED project, a collaborative project supported by the European Commission within its seventh Framework Programme, is concerned with the optimisation of the extremity dosimetry of medical staff in nuclear medicine. To evaluate the extremity doses and dose distributions across the hands of medical staff working in nuclear medicine departments, an extensive measurement programme has been started in 32 nuclear medicine departments in Europe. This was done using a standard protocol recording all relevant information for radiation exposure, i.e. radiation protection devices and tools. This study shows the preliminary results obtained for this measurement campaign. For diagnostic purposes, the two most-used radionuclides were considered: 99m Tc and 18 F. For therapeutic treatments, Zevalin w and DOTATOC (both labelled with 90 Y) were chosen. Large variations of doses were observed across the hands depending on different parameters. Furthermore, this study highlights the importance of the positioning of the extremity dosemeter for a correct estimate of the maximum skin doses.

No abstract

No abstract