Olfactory and gustatory dysfunction are frequently reported in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). However, the reported prevalence of olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction varies widely, and the reason for the inter-study differences is unclear. Hence, in this meta-analysis, we performed subgroup analyses to investigate the factors that contribute to the inter-study variability in the prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction. Out of 943 citations, we included 55 eligible studies with 13,527 patients with COVID-19 for a systematic review. The overall pooled prevalences of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction were 51.4% and 47.5%, respectively, in the random-effect model. In subgroup analyses, the prevalences of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction were significantly different among four geographical regions (both P < 0.001, respectively). Although the prevalences of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction did not significantly differ according to the time of enrollment, the subgroup analyses including only studies from the same geographical region (Europe) revealed a significant difference in olfactory dysfunction according to the time of enrollment. The regional and chronological differences in the prevalences of olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions partly explain the wide inter-study variability.

Background: Olfactory and gustatory dysfunction are frequently reported in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 . However, the reported prevalence of olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction varies widely, and the reason for the inter-study differences is unclear. Hence, in this meta-analysis, we performed subgroup analyses to investigate the factors that contribute to the inter-study variability in the prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction. Methods: Out of 943 citations, we included 55 eligible studies with 13,527 patients with COVID-19 for a meta-analysis. Calculating the data extracted from each study, the weighted summary prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction was estimated using a Freeman-Tukey transformation with models based on random-effects assumptions. A meta-analysis of variance compared the prevalence of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction according to regional, chronological, demographic, and methodologic factors, respectively. Results: The overall pooled prevalence rates of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction were 51.4% and 47.5%, respectively, in the random-effect model. In subgroup analyses, the prevalence rates of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction were significantly different among four geographical regions (both P < 0.001, respectively). Although the prevalence rates of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction did not significantly differ according to the time of enrollment, the subgroup analyses including only studies from the same geographical region (Europe) revealed a significant difference in olfactory dysfunction according to the time of enrollment. Conclusion: The regional and chronological differences in the prevalence rates of olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions partly explain the wide inter-study variability.

Sensorineural hearing loss is one of the most common inherited sensory disorders. Functional classifications of deafness genes have shed light on genotype- and mechanism-based pharmacological approaches and on gene therapy strategies. In this study, we characterized the clinical phenotypes and genotypes of non-syndromic deafness caused by transcription factor (TF) gene variants, one of the functional classifications of genetic hearing loss. Of 1280 probands whose genomic DNA was subjected to molecular genetic testing, TF genes were responsible for hearing loss in 2.6%. Thirty-three pathogenic variants, including nine novel variants, accounting for non-syndromic deafness were clustered in only four TF genes (POU3F4, POU4F3, LMX1A, and EYA4), which is indicative of a narrow molecular etiologic spectrum of TF genes, and the functional redundancy of many other TF genes, in the context of non-syndromic deafness. The audiological and radiological characteristics associated with the four TF genes differed significantly, with a wide phenotypic spectrum. The results of this study reveal the genetic load of TF gene alterations among a cohort with non-syndromic hearing loss. Additionally, we have further refined the clinical profiles associated with TF gene variants as a basis for a personalized, genetically tailored approach to audiological rehabilitation.

The slim modiolar electrode has been reported to ensure better modiolar proximity than previous conventional perimodiolar electrodes and consistently high scala tympani localization. Nonetheless, variability in modiolar proximity exists even among slim modiolar electrodes, still leaving room for further improvement of modiolar proximity, which may positively affect functional outcomes. Given this, the pull-back maneuver was reported to increase the modiolar proximity of slim modiolar electrodes in a cadaveric study, but in vivo repositioning effects remain to be established. Here we identified that the pull-back maneuver led to better modiolar proximity than conventional insertion while maintaining a similar angular insertion depth. Notably, the reduced electrode-modiolus distance from the pull-back maneuver was associated with significantly lower impedances across electrodes postoperatively as well as reduced intraoperative electrophysiological thresholds than conventional insertion. Among adult cochlear implant recipients, this maneuver resulted in significantly better sentence recognition scores at three months postoperatively when compared to those with a conventional insertion; however, this benefit was not observed at later intervals. Collectively, slim modiolar electrodes with the pull-back maneuver further enhance the modiolar proximity, possibly leading to better open-set sentence recognition, at least in the early postoperative stage.

Pleomorphic adenoma is one of the most common benign neoplasm of salivary glands and resection with enough normal tissue margin is important treatment for preventing the local recurrence. For palate tumor involving both soft palate and hard palate, palatal fistula is easier to occur as post-operative complication after resection of the tumor. The palatine aponeurosis is important anatomical barrier between soft palate and nasal cavity, and we found that by using palatine aponeurosis as surgical plane, we can do R0 resection of the tumor with preventing the palatal fistula complication. Also, we used inguinal full thickness skin graft to protect the exposed palatine aponeurosis in some cases. We analyzed 4 cases of palate pleomorphic adenoma resection using palatine aponeurosis as surgical plane and those operations were done by single surgeon. All of 4 patients had no palatal fistula and also had no recurrence of the tumor during the post-operative course.

Nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancers comprise about 1% of all malignancies, and 5% of head and neck malignancy. Squamous cell carcinoma comprises more than half of nasal cavity cancers. Treatment is determined by considering tumor size, location, staging, age, general condition, purpose of treatment, etc. Conventional therapy includes surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy; however, for the locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic cancer after conventional therapy, immunotherapy or targeted therapy are taken into consideration. Target therapy attacks specific cancer cells directly, such as cancer cells with certain gene mutation, whereas immunotherapy attacks cancer cells indirectly, stimulating our own immune system, such as T-cell activity. Histologically poorly differentiated carcinomas are treated with surgery, radiotherapy, and sometimes chemotherapy, but 5-year survival rate is low due to frequent recurrence. Here, we present a case of successful targeted therapy applied to recurrent nasal cavity cancer after serial application of conventional therapies.