No abstract

This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overiaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have t)een reproduced xerographically In this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directiy to order.

A physically based conceptual model for the in¯uence of barometric pressure on groundwater wells was developed and tested in this study. It was proposed that water level¯uctuations in response to barometric pressure are due in large part to the different manner in which the pressure is propagated through the water column in the well and the porous media outside the well. The loss in pressure head through the porous media causes a lateral hydraulic head gradient to be developed around the well-screen region, as well as a vertical one through the porous medium. The well-water¯ux across the screen and the consequent change in well-casing storage were appropriately linked with groundwater ow and estimated through an iteration technique. Results suggest that the physically based model in this study is effective in estimating the water level uctuations in a well due to changes in barometric pressure. The magnitude and behavior of well response varies with the hydraulic properties (hydraulic conductivity and speci®c storage) and well geometry (casing radius, screened length, and depth of well). Therefore, the model relating the barograph and responding water levels can potentially serve as a tool for estimation of hydraulic parameters of the tested formation in the equivalent manner of slug tests. In conclusion, the in¯uence of barometric pressure on groundwater wells is solved by relevant integration of three parts: i) the solution of the differential equation governing groundwater¯ow, ii) the estimation of well-water¯ux across the screen and changes in well-casing storage, and iii) use of the well screen as a boundary condition for coupling between i) and ii).