BackgroundRadical resection is the only curative treatment for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. While left-side hepatectomy (LH) may have an oncological disadvantage over right-side hepatectomy (RH) owing to the contiguous anatomical relationship between right hepatic inflow and biliary confluence, a small future liver remnant after RH could cause worse surgical morbidity and mortality. We retrospectively compared surgical morbidity and long-term outcome between RH and LH to determine the optimal surgical strategy for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.MethodsThis study considered 83 patients who underwent surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2010 and 2017. Among them, 57 patients undergoing curative-intent surgery including liver resection were enrolled for analysis—33 in the RH group and 27 in the LH group. Prospectively collected clinicopathologic characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and long-term survival were evaluated.ResultsPortal vein embolization was more frequently performed in the RH group than in the LH group (18.2% vs. 0%, P = 0.034). The proportion of R0 resection was comparable in both groups (75.8% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.948). The 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates did not differ between the groups (37.7% vs. 41.9%, P = 0.500, and 26.3% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.580, respectively). The side of liver resection did not affect long-term survival. In multivariate analysis, transfusion (odds ratio, 3.12 [1.42–6.87], P = 0.005) and post-hepatectomy liver failure (≥ grade B, 4.62 [1.86–11.49], P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for overall survival.ConclusionsWe recommend deciding the side of liver resection according to the possibility of achieving radical resection considering the anatomical differences between RH and LH.

No abstract

Purpose We evaluated the risk factors for posthepatectomy thrombosis including portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and clinical outcomes. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 563 patients who had undergone hepatectomy from February 2009 to December 2014. Twenty-nine patients with preoperatively confirmed thrombosis and tumor recurrence-related thrombosis were excluded. We identified the location of the thrombosis as main portal vein (MPV), peripheral portal vein (PPV) and other site such as hepatic vein or inferior vena cava. Patients with MPV thrombosis and PPV thrombosis with main portal flow disturbance were treated with anticoagulation therapy. We performed operative thrombectomy before anticoagulation therapy who did combined portal vein (PV) segmental resection. Results Of the 534 patients, 22 (4.1%) developed posthepatectomy thrombosis after hepatectomy. Among them, 19 (86.4%) had PVT. The mean duration of Pringle's maneuver was significant longer in the PVT group than the no-thrombosis group (P = 0.020). Patients who underwent combined PV segmental resection during hepatectomy were more likely to develop posthepatectomy PVT (P = 0.001). Thirteen patients who had MPV thrombosis and PPV thrombosis with main portal flow disturbance received anticoagulation therapy immediately after diagnosis and all of them were improved. Among them, 2 patients who developed PVT at the PV anastomosis site after PV segmental resection, underwent operative thrombectomy before anticoagulation therapy and both were improved. There were no patients who developed complications related to anticoagulation therapy. Conclusion Long duration of Pringle's maneuver and PV segmental resection were risk factors. Anticoagulation therapy or operative thrombectomy should be considered for PVT without contraindications.

This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between unplanned readmission and breast cancer operation cases, with the assumption that the rate of unplanned readmission within 30 days of surgery was solely due to postsurgical complications. We divided hospitals into three categories based on breast cancer operation cases: low-volume hospitals (< or =50 annual procedures), medium-volume hospitals (51-99 annual procedures) and high-volume hospitals (> or =100 annual procedures). The medical records of 1351 subjects in 24 hospitals were investigated. We found unplanned readmission rates were significantly higher in hospitals with a lower surgical volume. From these three groups, a sample consisting of 1351 patients was created and 17 unplanned readmission cases (1.2%) were reported. Of these 17 cases, 12 (70.59%) cases were from low-volume hospitals. The present results indicate that unplanned readmission within 30 days following discharge is an important adverse outcome in breast cancer surgery.

Biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (BilIN) is the most common noninvasive precursor lesion which progresses to cholangiocarcinoma (CC) and is often found synchronously adjacent to the tumor or at the surgical resection margin. The aim of this study was to elucidate the prevalence and prognostic effect of BilIN on survival after resection for CC. We retrospectively analyzed the database of patients with CC who underwent surgery performed at our institution from 2010 to 2017. There were 142 patients who underwent surgery for CC. BilIN was detected in 42 patients (29.5%). On univariate analysis, extrahepatic CC (ExtraH CC) patients with BilIN lesions significantly showed better disease-free survival ( P = 0.05). Also, although not statistically significant, ExtraH CC patients with BilIN lesions revealed better overall survival (OS) ( P = 0.09). On multivariate analysis, presence of BilIN lesion, irrespective of location, was significantly associated with better disease-free survival (HR = 2.059, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.057–4.432, P = 0.041) and OS (HR = 1.831, 95% CI: 1.149–3.534, P = 0.044) in ExtraH CC patients. The presence of BilIN lesions was not uncommon in CC patients and was significantly associated with better disease-free survival and OS in ExtraH CC patients. However, larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to accurately determine its clinical significance.

PurposeThe application rate for surgical residents in Korea has continuously decreased over the past few years. The demanding workload and the occupational stress of surgical training are likely causes of this problem. The aim of this study was to investigate occupational stress and its related factors in Korean surgical residents.MethodsWith the support of the Korean Surgical Society, we conducted an electronic survey of Korean surgical residents related to occupational stress. We used the Korean Occupational Stress Scale (KOSS) to measure occupational stress. We analyzed the data focused on the stress level and the factors associated with occupational stress.ResultsThe mean KOSS score of the surgical residents was 55.39, which was significantly higher than that of practicing surgeons (48.16, P < 0.001) and the average score of specialized professionals (46.03, P < 0.001). Exercise was the only factor found to be significantly associated with KOSS score (P = 0.001) in univariate analysis. However, in multiple linear regression analysis, the mean number of assigned patients, resident occupation rate and exercise were all significantly associated with KOSS score.ConclusionSurgical residents have high occupational stress compared to practicing surgeons and other professionals. Their mean number of assigned patients, resident recruitment rate and exercise were all significantly associated with occupational stress for surgical residents.

No abstract

No abstract