The methods of simultaneous extraction of iprodione, chlorpyrifos-methyl, EPN and endosulfan (with its metabolites) from kiwi fruit using accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), and liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) were tested and compared in terms of their of limits of detection and quantification, as well as the highest pesticide recoveries with the lowest residues in the final extracts. The analysis was performed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in the selected ion monitoring mode. The proposed methods featured good sensitivity, pesticide quantification limits were low enough, and the precision (expressed as relative standard deviations) ranged from 0.56 to 7.17%. The recoveries obtained from ASE, SFE and LLE were 77.5-120, 71.9-109.1 and 75.6-127.1%, respectively. The proposed methods were successfully applied for the monitoring of the selected pesticide residues in kiwi fruit samples collected from Jollanamdo area, Republic of Korea. Iprodione was detected at a level lower than the maximum residue limit (MRL) established by the Korea Food and Drug Administration (5 ppm), while EPN was detected at a level higher than the Korea Food and Drug Administration MRL (0.1 ppm) in the real samples. The proposed sample preparations led to a higher preconcentration of the pesticide fraction, and allowed the sensitive and selective determination of pesticides with varied physicochemical properties in kiwi fruit.

No abstract

The current study was undertaken to validate the performance for the determination of both TBA and beta-trenbolone (beta-TB) residues in porcine muscle at concentrations required to monitor compliance with the maximum residue limit (MRL). The method involves a one phase liquid-liquid extraction, cleanup with low-temperature fat precipitation, separation of the respective compounds by HPLC on a Capcell pak C(18) column, use of a methanol-water isocratic system as an eluent, and measurement by UV absorbance detection at 340 nm. Both compounds were confirmed using LC-MS/MS with electrospray interface (ESI) and a triple quadrupole (QqQ) analyzer. The method was found to be precise and accurate, with a linearity range of 1-10 microg/kg (r(2) >0.973). The intra- and interday precision showed good reproducibility with RSDs < or =13.25%. The LODs were 0.12 and 0.22 microg/kg, and the LOQs were 0.37 and 0.66 microg/kg, for TBA and beta-TB, respectively. The applicability of the method was demonstrated by analyzing real samples collected from major cities in the Republic of Korea. No residues of the selected compounds were detected in any of the samples. The advantages of our method are that it is: selective, sensitive, requires a short time for analysis (13 min), and performs simple sample extraction and clean-up procedure with low-temperature fat precipitation as compared to the previously published methods.

The primary objective of this study was to simultaneously analyze the residues of the most commonly used pesticides, chlorpyrifos-methyl, endosulfan, EPN, and iprodione in the water dropwort, via accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), and conventional solvent extraction (LLE) techniques. Residue levels were determined using GC with electron-capture detection (GC-ECD). The confirmation of pesticide identity was performed by GC-MS in a selected ion-monitoring (SIM) mode. In none of the ASE and SFE techniques were the extraction conditions optimized. Rather, the experimental variables were predicated on the author's experience. The ECD response for all pesticides was linear in the studied range of concentrations of 0.005-5.0 ppm, with correlation coefficients in excess of 0.9991. At each of the two studied fortification levels, the pesticides yielded recoveries in excess of 72% with RSDs between 1 and 19%. The LODs were achieved at a range of levels from 0.001 to 0.063 ppm, depending on the pesticide utilized. The LOQs, which ranged from 0.003 to 0.188 ppm, were lower than the maximum residue limits (MRLs) authorized by the Korean Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). All of the methods were applied successfully to the determination of pesticide residues in the real samples. It could, therefore, be concluded that any of the techniques utilized in this investigation might prove successful, given that the applied extraction conditions are wisely chosen.