This study aimed to determine if 3D printing can affect surgeon’s selection of plate for distal tibia fracture surgery and to find out whether orthopedic surgeons consider this technology necessary and would use it in their practice. A total of 102 orthopedic surgeons were asked to choose anatomically contoured locking plates among 5 most commonly used types for one simple and one complex distal tibia fracture based on X-ray and CT images. Next, they were provided real-size 3D printed models of the same fractures, allowed to apply each of the 5 plates to these models, and asked if they would change their choice of plate. A 10-point numeric rating scale was provided to measure the extent of the help that 3D printing provided on preoperative planning. Finally, we asked the surgeons if they would use 3D printing in their practice. Seventy-four percent of inexperienced surgeons changed their selection of plate after using 3D printed models for the complex fracture. In contrast, only 9% of experienced surgeons changed their selection of plate for the simple fracture. Surgeons rated the extent of usefulness of the 3D models in preoperative planning as a mean of 4.84 ± 2.54 points for the simple fracture and 6.63 ± 2.54 points for the complex fracture. The difference was significant (p < 0.001). Eighty-six percent of inexperienced surgeons wanted to use 3D models for complex fractures. However, only 18% of experienced surgeons wanted to use 3D printed models for simple fractures. The use of a real-size 3D-printed model often changed surgeon’s preoperative selection of locking plates, especially when inexperienced surgeons evaluated a complex fracture. However, experienced surgeons did not find 3D models very useful when assessing simple fractures. Future applications of 3D models should focus on training beginners in fracture surgery, especially when complex fractures are concerned.

Background:The effect of supramalleolar osteotomy without a bone marrow-stimulating procedure for articular cartilage regeneration in the ankle joint remains unknown. We investigated whether supramalleolar osteotomy yielded favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes. We also evaluated the joint tissue appearance after supramalleolar osteotomy without a bone marrow-stimulating procedure with use of second-look arthroscopy and its correlation with the outcome.Methods:Twenty-nine ankles were retrospectively reviewed at a mean of 2.9 years after supramalleolar osteotomy without a bone marrow-stimulating procedure. All 29 ankles had had second-look arthroscopy to evaluate tibiotalar joint tissue regeneration at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. A visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, and patient satisfaction were used for functional evaluations. Ankle osteoarthritis was classified with the Takakura staging system, and the tibial anterior surface (TAS) angle and tibial lateral surface (TLS) angle were measured on radiographs.Results:The mean VAS and AOFAS scores improved from 6.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7 to 6.8) preoperatively to 1.5 (95% CI, 0.9 to 2.1) postoperatively and from 60.5 (95% CI, 54.9 to 66.1) preoperatively to 88.3 (95% CI, 84.3 to 92.3) postoperatively, respectively. Patient satisfaction with the outcome of the procedure was classified as very satisfied or satisfied for 27 ankles (93.1%). Sixteen of 21 ankles that were classified as Takakura stage-IIIa and 2 of 3 ankles that were classified as stage-IIIb preoperatively improved to stage II postoperatively. The mean TAS and TLS angles significantly improved from 83.5° (95% CI, 82.2° to 84.7°) and 77.0° (95% CI, 75.4° to 78.7°) preoperatively to 94.2° (95% CI, 92.7° to 95.7°) and 80.4° (95% CI, 78.3° to 82.5°) postoperatively, respectively. On second-look arthroscopy, 26 ankles (89.7%) showed tissue regeneration of the medial compartment of the ankle joint and no patient showed cartilage deterioration.Conclusions:Medial tibiotalar tissue regeneration was identified in most patients with medial compartment ankle osteoarthritis following supramalleolar osteotomy without a bone marrow-stimulating procedure. The procedure results in satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes with high patient satisfaction.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Study Design Retrospective radiologic study. Objective The sagittal alignment of the cervical spine can be evaluated using either a lateral cervical radiograph or a whole-spine lateral view on which the cervical spine is included. To our knowledge, however, no report has compared the two. The purpose of this work is to identify the difference in radiographic parameters between the cervical spine lateral view and the whole-spine lateral view. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 59 adult patients suffering from neck pain with cervical spine lateral radiographs and whole-spine lateral radiographs from November 2007 to December 2011. The radiographs were measured using standard techniques to obtain the following parameters from the two different radiographs: occipital–C2 angle, C2–C7 angle, C7–sternal angle, sternal slope, T1 slope, C2 central offset distance, the distance between C2 and C7 plumb lines, C4 anteroposterior (AP) diameter, the ratio of C2 central off distance to C4 AP diameter, the ratio of plumb lines' distance to C4 AP diameter. Results We found that the occipital–C2 angle, sternal slope, and C4 AP diameter were similar, but the C2–C7 angle, C7–sternal angle, T1 slope, C2 central offset distance, distance between C2 and C7 plumb lines, ratio of C2 central off distance to C4 AP diameter, and ratio of plumb lines' distance to C4 AP diameter were different. However, the error of measurement was greater than the small angular and linear differences between the two views. Conclusions Most numerical values of the measured radiographic parameters appear to be different between the two views. However, the two views are comparable because the numerical differences were smaller than the errors of measurement.

To prove the equivalence of the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) in the printed (PFAOS) vs the electronic (EFAOS) form in a multicenter randomized study.Overall, 227 patients with ages ranging from 20 to 79 years from 16 dedicated foot and ankle centers were included. Patients were randomized into either a ‘paper first’ group (P-F group, n = 113) or an ‘electronic device (tablet computer) first’ group (E-F group, n = 114). The first evaluation either by paper (P-F group) or tablet (E-F group) was followed by a second evaluation the following day. The difference between the PFAOS and EFAOS results in each group was calculated and analyzed. To evaluate the benefit of each methodology, the time consumed per evaluation was compared and patients were asked which methodology they preferred and which was the easiest to use.There were no significant differences in age or sex between the groups. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value of 0.934 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.912–0.950, P < .001) was confirmed in PFAOS and EFAOS, showing a significant correlation between the 2 methodologies. EFAOS was completed in a shorter amount of time than PFAOS. The majority of patients agreed that EFAOS was easier to complete than PFAOS.The paper or electronic forms of the Korean adaptation of FAOS were considered equivalent. The shorter time of completion and the preference for the electronic version over paper by patients deems the electronic FAOS a promising option to consider in future.