East respiratory syndrome (34•4%), 8 but higher than that of influenza (0•1%). 9,10 We declare no competing interests.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Over the recent months, the scenery of the pharmacological treatment of heart failure has changed. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have become the protagonists, as trial after trial is revealing a prognostic benefit of their use for patients with heart failure (HF). While their clear advantage in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has resulted in the addition of SGLT2i in the most recent treatment guidelines 1, the magnitude of their impact in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is still debated. With the recent results of EMPEROR-Preserved trial shedding more light into this matter 2, concrete evidence is needed now more than ever to ascertain the role of SGLT2i in the management of HFpEF. Aims We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of SLGT2i in the management of patients with HF. More specifically, we performed a pre-specified subgroup analysis to assess the impact of this drug class in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction separately. Methods We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases from inception to 15th of September. With the primary endpoint being hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF) or cardiovascular death (CVD), we identified 9,493 articles out of which 8 randomised controlled trials and 20,758 patients were included in the meta-analysis 2–9. The hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI given in each study were used for the meta-analysis. A random-effects model with inverse-variance weights was used to combine the effect measures from all studies on a logarithmic scale. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. The statistical analyses were conducted using the Review Manager (RevMan) software (version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). Results The use of SGLT2i was associated with a significant reduction in HHF or CVD both for the patients with heart failure and EF>40% (HR=0.78, 95%CI: 0.69, 0.87; I2 0%) and for the patients with heart failure and EF<40% (HR=0.74, 95%CI: 0.68, 0.81; I2 0%), while for the total population SGLT2i reduced the risk of HHF or CV death by 25% (HR=0.75, 95%CI: 0.70, 0.81; I2 0%) (figure 1). Additionally, a prespecified subanalysis showed that in the specific cohort of patients with heart failure and EF>50%, SGLT2i resulted in 23% lower risk of HHF or CV death (HR=0.77, 95%CI: 0.66, 0.91; I2 22%) (figure 2). Conclusion This meta-analysis provides robust evidence that SGLT2i appear to have a prognostic benefit across the spectrum of heart failure subgroups in terms of HHF or CV death. Further large-scale randomised trials examining the role of this drug class in the management of HFpEF would be extremely valuable and might transform the field of therapeutic strategies in this challenging clinical entity.

No abstract

ImportancePost−COVID-19 condition (PCC) is a complex heterogeneous disorder that has affected the lives of millions of people globally. Identification of potential risk factors to better understand who is at risk of developing PCC is important because it would allow for early and appropriate clinical support.ObjectiveTo evaluate the demographic characteristics and comorbidities that have been found to be associated with an increased risk of developing PCC.Data sourcesMedline and Embase databases were systematically searched from inception to December 5, 2022.Study SelectionThe meta-analysis included all published studies that investigated the risk factors and/or predictors of PCC in adult (≥18 years) patients.Data Extraction and SynthesisOdds ratios (ORs) for each risk factor were pooled from the selected studies. For each potential risk factor, the random-effects model was used to compare the risk of developing PCC between individuals with and without the risk factor. Data analyses were performed from December 5, 2022, to February 10, 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe risk factors for PCC included patient age; sex; body mass index, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared; smoking status; comorbidities, including anxiety and/or depression, asthma, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, immunosuppression, and ischemic heart disease; previous hospitalization or ICU (intensive care unit) admission with COVID-19; and previous vaccination against COVID-19.ResultsThe initial search yielded 5334 records of which 255 articles underwent full-text evaluation, which identified 41 articles and a total of 860 783 patients that were included. The findings of the meta-analysis showed that female sex (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.41-1.73), age (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.11-1.33), high BMI (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.08-1.23), and smoking (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.07-1.13) were associated with an increased risk of developing PCC. In addition, the presence of comorbidities and previous hospitalization or ICU admission were found to be associated with high risk of PCC (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.97-3.13 and OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 2.18-2.56, respectively). Patients who had been vaccinated against COVID-19 with 2 doses had a significantly lower risk of developing PCC compared with patients who were not vaccinated (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43-0.76).Conclusions and RelevanceThis systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that certain demographic characteristics (eg, age and sex), comorbidities, and severe COVID-19 were associated with an increased risk of PCC, whereas vaccination had a protective role against developing PCC sequelae. These findings may enable a better understanding of who may develop PCC and provide additional evidence for the benefits of vaccination.Trial RegistrationPROSPERO Identifier: CRD42022381002

No abstract

No abstract

Purpose There is much debate regarding the use of anticoagulation following vascular trauma. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the outcome of trauma following administration of anticoagulation medication. Methods The literature search was carried out using Ovid MEDLINE and PubMed databases to search for keywords and MeSH terms including "Anticoagulation", "Vascular Surgery", "Vascular Trauma", "Vascular Repair", "Repair" and "Wounds and Injuries". Results Use of anticoagulation was associated with a better prognosis for overall vascular trauma outcomes (weighted OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.34-0.64; P < 0.00001), as well as reduced risk of amputation for both lower and upper limb vascular trauma (weighted OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.22-0.78; P = 0.007), and reduced occurrence of reoperation events and amputations in isolated lower limb vascular trauma (weighted OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.14-0.52; P < 0.0001). Conclusion There was a statistically significant correlation between the use of anticoagulation and vascular trauma outcome. A major limitation with many of the studies includes a lack of prospective analysis and therefore we recommend prospective studies to properly elucidate prognostic outcomes following use of these anticoagulants. Further studies need to be conducted to assess the effects of timing of anticoagulant delivery, dosages and severity of traumatic injury. Thus, this would prove to be very useful in the formation of guidelines.

No abstract