No abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to show the effect of simvastatin on intra-abdominal adhesion formation. Method: Adhesion formation was achieved by scratching the cecum and anterior abdominal wall following median laparotomy. Three different groups of 10 rats each were formed. In group I, 0.57 mg/kg/day simvastatin was injected intraperitoneally right after the operation and for 5 days thereafter. In group II, an equal dose of simvastatin to that used in group I was given via gavage. A physiological saline solution was given to group III for the same period of time. On the 6th and 14th day, blood samples were taken and peritoneal lavage was performed to measure the tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) activity. Adhesions were graded via re-laparotomies on the 14th day after the first operation. Results: The adhesion scores were 1.40 ± 0.22, 1.50 ± 0.26, and 2.90 ± 0.34 in groups I, II, and III, respectively (p = 0.007), and the score was higher in group III than in the other groups (p = 0.005, p = 0.011). Conclusion: Intraperitoneal simvastatin application decreases adhesion formation by increasing the t-PA level in abdominal surgery.

No abstract

Background: Scarring is one of the steps of excessive wound healing, causing dysfunction of the involved tissues and clinically poor cosmetics. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor on renal scar formation in experimental pyelonephritis. Materials and Methods: Four groups of 10 Balb/C mice were formed. In groups I and II following the inoculation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) into both kidneys, 0.18 and 0.36 mg/day of rofecoxib was given respectively via intraperitoneal route for 5 days. No medication was applied following physiological saline solution injection to both kidneys of the mice in group III (negative control group). After group IV’s LPS inoculation on the first day, saline solution (1 ml/day) was given intraperitoneally for 5 days (positive control group). Following the exposure of both kidneys, LPS of Escherichia coli (5 mg/kg) was injected into the kidneys of groups I, II, and IV. In group III, saline solution (0.1 ml) was used instead of LPS. Three days after the inoculation of LPS, solutions containing 0.18 and 0.36 mg of COX-2 inhibitor were given intraperitoneally for 5 days in groups I and II. No medication was used for the mice in group III. Six weeks after the inoculation of LPS and saline solution, all mice were humanely euthanized. Bilateral nephrectomies were done on each group of mice, and histopathological examination was performed. Results: Inoculation of LPS into the renal parenchyma caused pyelonephritis and scar formation in all groups. The degree of pyelonephritis and scar formation was lesser in groups in which COX-2 inhibitors were used. The degree of scar formation was lesser in group II, in which 0.36 mg more of COX-2 inhibitor was used than in group I (0.18 mg of COX-2 inhibitor). Conclusion: In our study model, direct inoculation of LPS to kidneys caused experimentally induced pyelonephritis. Renal scar formation was effectively prevented through the utilization of rofecoxib at 0.36-mg doses.

Introduction: The liver is critical in multiple processes, including the clearance of endogenous compounds, the synthesis of macromolecules, and organ-specific biotransformation processes. Therefore, the liver’s regenerating capacity is of vital importance. Multiple pathways are activated in the complex process that leads to hepatic regeneration. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of proton pump inhibitors omeprozole, lansoprazole, and pantoprazole on hepatic regeneration following partial hepatectomy. Materials and Methods: Four groups were formed with 32 rats in each. Partial liver resections were performed for all animals. Omeprazole (71.4 µg/day), lansoprazole (107 µg/day), pantoprazole (143 µg/day) and placebo (0.5 cm³) were administered to the groups respectively. A quarter of the rats in each group were sacrificed on the 1st postoperative day. The rest were sacrificed on the 3rd, 5th and 7th postoperative days. The remnant regenerating liver mass was removed and weighed, and Ki-67 monoclonal antibody levels were measured. Results: There was no statistical difference between the four groups on the first day in evaluating the weight of the liver mass (p = 0.09) and Ki-67 (p = 0.268) levels. Only the omeprazole group showed a difference; the Ki-67 level was lower in the omeprazole group on the 3rd (p = 0.003, p = 0.0001, p = 0.003), 5th (p = 0.017, p = 0.001, p = 0.0001) and 7th (p = 0.0001) days compared to the other groups. Also the weight of the remnant liver mass was lower in the omeprazole group on the 3rd, 5th and 7th (p = 0.0001) days. Conclusion: We figured out that lansoprazole and pantoprazole have no effects on liver regeneration, whereas omeprazole showed a negative effect on hepatic regeneration.

Background/Aims: Ischemia-reperfusion injury is a serious clinical situation which can cause serious morbidity and mortality. An experimental renal ischemia-reperfusion injury model was designed to evaluate the role of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) on renal function and histology. Methods: 50 Wistar albino rats were used in our study. Five groups were formed: (1) sham-control group; (2) acute renal ischemia (ARI) group with placebo (0.9% NaCl) infusion; (3) GTN infusion with a 75 µg/kg/min dose prior to ARI was administered; (4) GTN infusion with a 150 µg/kg/min dose prior to ARI was given, and finally (5) 150 µg/kg/min GTN infusion after the ARI period was applied. Serum BUN and creatinine levels were measured for evaluation of renal function. T_max-sec, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and T_max-min results following a ^99mTc-DTPA diuretic renal scintigraphy were used. Histological examination was performed on nephrectomy specimens. Results: Groups 2 and 5 showed higher BUN, creatinine, and lower GFR values than the other groups (p = 0.0001). There was no difference in BUN, creatinine, and GFR levels between groups 2 and 5 (p = 0.971, p = 0.739, p = 0.393). Also the T_max-sec values were higher in groups 2 and 5 compared with the other groups (p = 0.0001). The presence of tubular necrosis was different between groups and was higher in groups 2 and 5 (p = 0.002). Conclusion: The application of GTN, a nitric oxide donor, has caused significant improvement in renal function when applied prior to an experimentally designed renal ischemia-reperfusion model. But administration of GTN had no effect after occurrence of ischemia.

Bevacizumab (Bev) is a vascular endothelial growth factor-A monoclonal antibody that targets tumor angiogenesis. The transfusion rate of Bev is 90 min in the first dose, 60 min in the second and than from the third dose it is 30 min if no hypersensitivity reaction occurs in the first two doses. The purpose of this study determines whether these initial prolonged infusions are really necessary or not. Between 2007 and 2009, we were using the standard schedule for Bev infusions. In July 2009, we reviewed our medical reports, nursing orders and adverse drug reaction forms to identify the Bev used patients and possible hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Depending on that information between August 2009 and July 2014, we started to make Bev infusions in 30 min from the first dose of the therapy. In this study, we documented the findings of these 30-min infusion used patients. From August 2009 to July 2014, we treated 145 patients with 1,145 Bev infusions each one in 30 min. Out of 145 patients, 12 of them received only single dosage of Bev infusion treatment. Bev doses were 5 mg/kg for 87 patients, 7.5 mg/kg for 64 patients, 10 mg/kg for four patients and 15 mg/kg for only one patient. No HSRs were reported during these transfusions. Initial prolonged infusion times are unnecessary for Bev. Thirty-minute infusion rates can be used safely for all courses.

YouTube is one of the most frequently used online sources providing easy access to health information with a large, diverse, and searchable video library. However, an unregulated policy and lack of peer-review process are important disadvantages. Accordingly, while based on thousands of surgical, animated, oral presentation and patient-experience videos, the information provided by YouTube videos is considered questionable in terms of quality, accuracy and credibility.