Interestingly, some protein domains are intrinsically disordered (abbreviated as IDD), and the disorder degree of same domains may differ in different contexts. However, the evolutionary causes and biological significance of these phenomena are unclear. Here, we address these issues by genome-wide analyses of the evolutionary and functional features of IDDs in 1,870 species across the three superkingdoms. As the result, there is a significant positive correlation between the proportion of IDDs and organism complexity with some interesting exceptions. These phenomena may be due to the high disorder of clade-specific domains and the different disorder degrees of the domains shared in different clades. The functions of IDDs are clade-specific and the higher proportion of post-translational modification sites may contribute to their complex functions. Compared with metazoans, fungi have more IDDs with a consecutive disorder region but a low disorder ratio, which reflects their different functional requirements. As for disorder variation, it’s greater for domains among different proteins than those within the same proteins. Some clade-specific ‘no-variation’ or ‘high-variation’ domains are involved in clade-specific functions. In sum, intrinsic domain disorder is related to both the organism complexity and clade-specific functions. These results deepen the understanding of the evolution and function of IDDs.

No abstract

Background One striking feature of the large KRAB domain-containing zinc finger protein (KZFP) family is its rapid evolution, leading to hundreds of member genes with various origination time in a certain mammalian genome. However, a comprehensive genome-wide and across-taxa analysis of the structural and expressional features of KZFPs with different origination time is lacking. This type of analysis will provide valuable clues about the functional characteristics of this special family. Results In this study, we found several conserved paradoxical phenomena about this issue. 1) Ordinary young domains/proteins tend to be disordered, but most of KRAB domains are completely structured in 64 representative species across the superclass of Sarcopterygii and most of KZFPs are also highly structured, indicating their rigid and unique structural and functional characteristics; as exceptions, old-zinc-finger-containing KZFPs have relatively disordered KRAB domains and linker regions, contributing to diverse interacting partners and functions. 2) In general, young or highly structured proteins tend to be spatiotemporal specific and have low abundance. However, by integrated analysis of 29 RNA-seq datasets, including 725 samples across early embryonic development, embryonic stem cell differentiation, embryonic and adult organs, tissues in 7 mammals, we found that KZFPs tend to express ubiquitously with medium abundance regardless of evolutionary age and structural disorder degree, indicating the wide functional requirements of KZFPs in various states. 3) Clustering and correlation analysis reveal that there are differential expression patterns across different spatiotemporal states, suggesting the specific-high-expression KZFPs may play important roles in the corresponding states. In particular, part of young-zinc-finger-containing KZFPs are highly expressed in early embryonic development and ESCs differentiation into endoderm or mesoderm. Co-expression analysis revealed that young-zinc-finger-containing KZFPs are significantly enriched in five co-expression modules. Among them, one module, including 13 young-zinc-finger-containing KZFPs, showed an ‘early-high and late-low’ expression pattern. Further functional analysis revealed that they may function in early embryonic development and ESC differentiation via participating in cell cycle related processes. Conclusions This study shows the conserved and special structural, expressional features of KZFPs, providing new clues about their functional characteristics and potential causes of their rapid evolution.

The consecutive disordered regions (CDRs) are the basis for the formation of intrinsically disordered proteins, which contribute to various biological functions and increasing organism complexity. Previous studies have revealed that CDRs may be present inside or outside protein domains, but a comprehensive analysis of the property differences between these two types of CDRs and the proteins containing them is lacking. In this study, we investigated this issue from three viewpoints. Firstly, we found that in-domain CDRs are more hydrophilic and stable but have less stickiness and fewer post-translational modification sites compared with out-domain CDRs. Secondly, at the protein level, we found that proteins with only in-domain CDRs originated late, evolved rapidly, and had weak functional constraints, compared with the other two types of CDR-containing proteins. Proteins with only in-domain CDRs tend to be expressed spatiotemporal specifically, but they tend to have higher abundance and are more stable. Thirdly, we screened the CDR-containing protein domains that have a strong correlation with organism complexity. The CDR-containing domains tend to be evolutionarily young, or they changed from a domain without CDR to a CDR-containing domain during evolution. These results provide valuable new insights about the evolution and function of CDRs and protein domains.

No abstract