The growing demand for fluxes, dictated by the shift toward porcelain stoneware, is urging the ceramic tile industry to find a viable alternative to feldspathic materials. Sericite, a microcrystalline form of muscovite, is present in many ceramic raw materials. It melts during firing and can be a suitable substitute for potassic feldspar. The aim of this study is to understand in depth the effects of replacing feldspar with sericite in porcelain stoneware batches with nearly the same chemical composition. Characterization includes phase composition (X‐ray powder diffraction, XRPD Rietveld), melt chemical composition (calculated), sintering behavior (optical thermo‐dilatometry), and microstructure (scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results indicate a different vitrification path, mostly in the early stage of sintering, related to the different mineralogical composition and particle size distribution of sericite for K‐feldspar. Nevertheless, at temperatures higher than 1150°C, the bodies have similar phase composition, microstructure, melt chemical composition, and physical properties. Densification kinetics is faster in the batch with sericite, while the body with feldspar is able to reach a higher bulk density.

O conteúdo dos artigos e seus dados em sua forma, correção e confiabilidade são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores. Permitido o download da obra e o compartilhamento desde que sejam atribuídos créditos aos autores, mas sem a possibilidade de alterá-la de nenhuma forma ou utilizá-la para fins comerciais.