The outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus disease worldwide is becoming rapidly a major concern. The number of severe cases has increased dramatically worldwide, while specific treatment options are scarce. The main pathologic features of severe or critical COVID-19 were consistent with acute lung injure (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), characterized by cellular fibromyxoid exudates, extensive pulmonary inflammation, pulmonary edema, and hyaline membrane formation. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can balance the inflammatory response and has been mentioned to be effective on ALI/ARDS from both infectious and noninfectious causes previously, presenting an important opportunity to be applied to COVID-19. In this commentary, we summarize the clinical trials of MSCs treatments on ALI/ARDS and raise MSCs as a hopefully alternative therapy for severe or critical COVID-19.

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Compared with the placebo, biologics are beneficial in reducing nasal polyp mass and safe in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, there lacks a head-to-head randomized trial comparing biologics. We aimed to determine the best biologic for CRSwNP. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA), which was registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42021226766). A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library on December 29, 2020. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing biologics in adult patients for CRSwNP were included. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Nine RCTs with 1,190 patients comparing 3 different biologics (dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab) and the placebo were included. Dupilumab had the best efficacy in terms of nasal polyp score (NPS), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) score, University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) score, and nasal congestion score (NCS) for surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 0.900, 0.916, 1.000, and 0.807, respectively. Omalizumab ranked second in efficacy in terms of SNOT-22, UPSIT, and NCS for SUCRA values of 0.606, 0.500, and 0.693, respectively. Mepolizumab ranked second in efficacy in terms of NPS for SUCRA values of 0.563 and had the highest risk of adverse events (AEs) for SUCRA values of 0.746. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This is the first NMA that compared different biologics in patients with CRSwNP. Based on the efficacy (NPS) and safety (AEs), dupilumab is the best choice and omalizumab is the second best option for CRSwNP. Although mepolizumab ranked second in efficacy, it had the highest risk of AEs.

ObjectiveAnalyzing the symptom characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019(COVID‐19) to improve control and prevention.MethodsUsing the Baidu Index Platform (http://index.baidu.com) and the website of Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention as data resources to obtain the search volume (SV) of keywords for symptoms associated with COVID‐19 from January 1 to February 20 in each year from 2017 to 2020 and the epidemic data in Hubei province and the other top 9 impacted provinces in China. Data of 2020 were compared with those of the previous three years. Data of Hubei province were compared with those of the other 9 provinces. The differences and characteristics of the SV of COVID‐19‐related symptoms, and the correlations between the SV of COVID‐19 and the number of newly confirmed/suspected cases were analyzed. The lag effects were discussed.ResultsComparing the SV from January 1, 2020 to February 20, 2020 with those for the same period of the previous three years, Hubei's SV for cough, fever, diarrhea, chest tightness, dyspnea, and other symptoms were significantly increased. The total SV of lower respiratory symptoms was significantly higher than that of upper respiratory symptoms (P＜0.001). The SV of COVID‐19 in Hubei province was significantly correlated with the number of newly confirmed/suspected cases (rconfirmed = 0.723, rsuspected = 0.863, both p < 0.001). The results of the distributed lag model suggested that the patients who searched relevant symptoms on the Internet may begin to see doctors in 2–3 days later and be confirmed in 3–4 days later.ConclusionThe total SV of lower respiratory symptoms was higher than that of upper respiratory symptoms, and the SV of diarrhea also increased significantly. It warned us to pay attention to not only the symptoms of the lower respiratory tract but also the gastrointestinal symptoms, especially diarrhea in patients with COVID‐19. Internet search behavior had a positive correlation with the number of newly confirmed/suspected cases, suggesting that big data has an important role in the early warning of infectious diseases.

Purpose Histopathologic characterizations of central compartment atopic disease (CCAD) by whole-slide imaging remains lacking. We aim to study clinical presentations and cellular endotyping diagnosis of Chinese CCAD using artificial intelligence (AI). Methods A total of 72 patients diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) were enrolled. CCAD was defined by positive result of serology specific IgE, endoscopic and radiological findings. The aeroallergen sensitization status, endoscopic results, radiological findings, and symptoms were evaluated and compared between patients with CCAD (n=14), eosinophilic CRSwNP (ENP, n=32) and non-eosinophilic CRSwNP (NENP, n=26). The cellular endotypes including eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and plasma cells were analyzed by the AI chronic rhinosinusitis evaluation platform 2.0. Results CCAD was most common in male (71.43%). The positive rate of aeroallergen in patients with CCAD is 100%, which is much higher than those in patients with ENP (40.63%) and NENP (23.08%). Allergic rhinitis incidence was found to be 57.14% in Chinese CCAD subjects, which is obviously higher when compared with those in patients with ENP (21.88%) or NENP (0.00%). The presence of asthma was not significantly different between groups. Chinese CCAD population demonstrated mild symptoms and lower endoscopic and radiological scores than those in patients with ENP and NENP. For cellular endotypes in CCAD subjects, the median of eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and plasma cells was 26.55%, 0.49%, 60.85%, and 7.33%, respectively. The proportion of eosinophils in nasal tissue and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from the CCAD group is between the proportions in those patients with ENP and NENP. Conclusion Chinese CCAD was associated with aeroallergen sensitivity, and displayed an eosinophil-dominant inflammatory pattern. Thus, proper management with allergy control and topical steroids could be recommended for CCAD treatment.

Background artificial intelligence (AI) for cellular phenotyping diagnosis of nasal polyps by whole-slide imaging (WSI) is lacking. We aim to establish an AI chronic rhinosinusitis evaluation platform 2.0 (AICEP 2.0) to obtain the proportion of inflammatory cells for cellular phenotyping diagnosis of nasal polyps and to explore the clinical significance of different phenotypes of nasal polyps on the WSI. Methods a total of 453 patients were enrolled in our study. For the development of AICEP 2.0, 179 patients (WSIs) were obtained from the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University (3HSYSU) from January 2008 to December 2018. A total of 24,625 patches were automatically extracted from the regions of interest under a 400× HPF by Openslide and the number of inflammatory cells in these patches was counted by two pathologists. For the application of AICEP 2.0 in a prospective cohort, 158 patients aged 14–70 years old with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) who had undergone endoscopic sinus surgery at 3HSYSU from June 2020 to December 2020 were included for preoperative demographic characteristics. For the application of AICEP 2.0 in a retrospective cohort, 116 patients with CRSwNP who had undergone endoscopic sinus surgery from May 2016 to June 2017 were enrolled for the recurrence rate. The proportion of inflammatory cells of these patients on WSI was calculated by our AICEP 2.0. Findings for AICEP 2.0, the mean absolute errors of the ratios of eosinophils, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and plasma cells were 1.64%, 2.13%, 1.06%, and 1.22%, respectively. The four phenotypes of nasal polyps were significantly different in clinical characteristics (including asthma, itching, sneezing, total IgE, peripheral eosinophils%, tissue eosinophils%, tissue neutrophils%, tissue lymphocytes%, tissue plasma cells%, and recurrence rate; P <0.05), but there were no significant differences in age distribution, onset time, total VAS score, Lund-Kennedy score, or Lund-Mackay score. The percentage of peripheral eosinophils was positively correlated with the percentage of tissue eosinophils ( r = 0.560, P <0.001) and negatively correlated with tissue lymphocytes% ( r = -0.489, P <0.001), tissue neutrophils% ( r = -0.225, P = 0.005), and tissue plasma cells% ( r = -0.266, P = 0.001) in WSIs.

No abstract

Acute haemorrhagic conjunctivitis is a highly contagious eye disease, the prediction of acute haemorrhagic conjunctivitis is very important to prevent and grasp its development trend. We use the exponential smoothing model and the seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) model to analyse and predict. The monthly incidence data from 2004 to 2017 were used to fit two models, the actual incidence of acute haemorrhagic conjunctivitis in 2018 was used to validate the model. Finally, the prediction effect of exponential smoothing is best, the mean square error and the mean absolute percentage error were 0.0152 and 0.1871, respectively. In addition, the incidence of acute haemorrhagic conjunctivitis in Chongqing had a seasonal trend characteristic, with the peak period from June to September each year.

ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of omalizumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and to identify evidence gaps that will guide future research on omalizumab for CRSwNP.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesA comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library on 13 October 2020.Eligibility criteriaRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing omalizumab with placebo, given for at least 16 weeks in adult patients with CRSwNP.Data extraction and synthesisTwo independent authors screened search results, extracted data and assessed studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data were pooled using the inverse-variance method and expressed as mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed by the χ2 test and the I2 statistic.ResultsA total of four RCTs involving 303 participants were identified. When comparing omalizumab to placebo, there was a significant difference in Nasal Polyps Score (MD=−1.20; 95% CI −1.48 to −0.92), Nasal Congestion Score (MD=−0.67; 95% CI −0.86 to −0.48), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (MD=−15.62; 95% CI −19.79 to −11.45), Total Nasal Symptom Score (MD=−1.84; 95% CI −2.43 to −1.25) and reduced need for surgery (risk ratio (RR)=5.61; 95% CI 1.99 to 15.81). Furthermore, there was no difference in the risk of serious adverse events ((RR=1.40; 95% CI 0.29 to 6.80), adverse events (RR=0.83; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.15) and rescue systemic corticosteroid (RR=0.52; 95% CI 0.17 to 1.61).ConclusionsThis was the first meta-analysis that identified omalizumab significantly improved endoscopic, clinical and patient-reported outcomes in adults with moderate to severe CRSwNP and it was safe and well tolerated.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020207639.