Autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs), presenting cutaneous and/or mucosal bullous lesions, are classified into pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases. A longtime observation for complicated AIBD cases is rarely reported. In this study, serum samples of one AIBD patient were collected at seven different time points during the disease course including a relapse, which were examined by our conventional and newly developed methods for the detection of autoantibodies. Interestingly, we found changes of both the presence and the titers of various autoantibodies in accordance with the changes of clinical features during the whole disease course, which indicated that the patient started as bullous pemphigoid and relapsed as concurrence of bullous pemphigoid and mucosal-dominant-type pemphigus vulgaris.
Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a type of subepithelial autoimmune bullous disease, affecting various mucosae, occasionally with skin lesions. Both diagnosis and treatment of MMP are difficult. Although multiple autoantigens have been identified for MMP, the pathogenesis of MMP is still unclear. In this study, we presented a female MMP case with extensive oral mucosal lesions and skin lesions, particularly on the extremities. IgG and IgA autoantibodies against multiple autoantigens including BP180, laminin 332, integrinα6β4 and desmoglein 3, and IgM autoantibodies against BP180 were identified during the disease course. Compared with IgG autoantibodies, the levels of IgA autoantibodies against various autoantigens decreased more significantly with improvement of clinical features after the initiation of treatments. Our findings indicated the importance of comprehensive autoantibody screening for different immunoglobulin types and autoantigens at multiple time points for the precise diagnosis of various autoimmune bullous diseases, and the significant involvement of IgA autoantibodies into the pathogenesis of MMP.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.