Proteomics data are often plagued with missingness issues. These missing values (MVs) threaten the integrity of subsequent statistical analyses by reduction of statistical power, introduction of bias, and failure to represent the true sample. Over the years, several categories of missing value imputation (MVI) methods have been developed and adapted for proteomics data. These MVI methods perform their tasks based on different prior assumptions (e.g., data is normally or independently distributed) and operating principles (e.g., the algorithm is built to address random missingness only), resulting in varying levels of performance even when dealing with the same dataset. Thus, to achieve a satisfactory outcome, a suitable MVI method must be selected. To guide decision making on suitable MVI method, we provide a decision chart which facilitates strategic considerations on datasets presenting different characteristics. We also bring attention to other issues that can impact proper MVI such as the presence of confounders (e.g., batch effects) which can influence MVI performance. Thus, these too, should be considered during or before MVI.
Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) carry out the cellular processes of all living organisms. Experimental methods for PPI detection suffer from high cost and false-positive rate, hence efficient computational methods are highly desirable for facilitating PPI detection. In recent years, benefiting from the enormous amount of protein data produced by advanced high-throughput technologies, machine learning models have been well developed in the field of PPI prediction. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of the recently proposed machine learning-based prediction methods. The machine learning models applied in these methods and details of protein data representation are also outlined. To understand the potential improvements in PPI prediction, we discuss the trend in the development of machine learning-based methods. Finally, we highlight potential directions in PPI prediction, such as the use of computationally predicted protein structures to extend the data source for machine learning models. This review is supposed to serve as a companion for further improvements in this field.
Data analysis is complex due to a myriad of technical problems. Amongst these, missing values and batch effects are endemic. Although many methods have been developed for missing value imputation (MVI) and batch correction respectively, no study has directly considered the confounding impact of MVI on downstream batch correction. This is surprising as missing values are imputed during early pre-processing while batch effects are mitigated during late pre-processing, prior to functional analysis. Unless actively managed, MVI approaches generally ignore the batch covariate, with unknown consequences. We examine this problem by modelling three simple imputation strategies: global (M1), self-batch (M2) and cross-batch (M3) first via simulations, and then corroborated on real proteomics and genomics data. We report that explicit consideration of batch covariates (M2) is important for good outcomes, resulting in enhanced batch correction and lower statistical errors. However, M1 and M3 are error-generating: global and cross-batch averaging may result in batch-effect dilution, with concomitant and irreversible increase in intra-sample noise. This noise is unremovable via batch correction algorithms and produces false positives and negatives. Hence, careless imputation in the presence of non-negligible covariates such as batch effects should be avoided.
In the process of identifying phenotype-specific or differentially expressed proteins from proteomic data, a standard workflow consists of five key steps: raw data quantification, expression matrix construction, matrix normalization, missing data imputation, and differential expression analysis. However, due to the availability of multiple options at each step, selecting ad hoc combinations of options can result in suboptimal analysis. To address this, we conducted an extensive study involving 10,808 experiments to compare the performance of exhaustive option combinations for each step across 12 gold standard spike-in datasets and three quantification platforms: FragPipe, MaxQuant, and DIA-NN. By employing frequent pattern mining techniques on the data from these experiments, we discovered high-performing rules for selecting optimal workflows. These rules included avoiding normalization, utilizing MinProb for missing value imputation, and employing limma for differential expression analysis. We found that workflow performances were predictable and could be accurately categorized using average F1 scores and Matthew's correlation coefficients, both exceeding 0.79 in 10-fold cross-validations. Furthermore, by integrating the top-ranked workflows through ensemble inference, we not only improved the accuracy of differential expression analysis (e.g., achieving a 1-5% gain under five performance metrics for FragPipe), but also enhanced the workflow's ability to aggregate proteomic information across various levels, including peptide and protein level intensities and spectral counts, providing a comprehensive perspective on the data. Overall, our study highlights the importance of selecting optimal workflow combinations and demonstrates the benefits of ensemble inference in improving both the accuracy and comprehensiveness of proteomic data analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.