b S Supporting Information T here is a surge of interest in synthetic models of mononuclear nonheme iron enzymes, 1À6 which perform CÀH activation and lead to the formation of alcohols and alkenes. Both the enzymes 1 and the synthetic models utilize high-valent iron-(IV)-oxo complexes as the active species. 2À5 One of the potent synthetic complexes is [N4PyFe IV O] 2+ (N4Py: N,N-bis (2-pyridylmethyl)-bis(2-pyridyl) methylamine), which is depicted in Scheme 1 and which is capable of activating even cyclohexane. 6,7 However, unlike the enzymatic complexes that have high-spin quintet (S = 2) ground states, the synthetic variants are generally characterized by triplet ground states (S = 1) 4 and low-lying quintet excited states (S = 2) and as such have a more complex reactivity behavior. Density functional theory (DFT) has contributed to the understanding of this reactivity, which was characterized as two-state reactivity (TSR), 8 wherein the S = 2 state cuts through the larger S = 1 barrier and mediates the reaction. 9À13 However, because most of the synthetic complexes carry a high positive charge, usually 2+, the gas-phase calculations have resulted in some nonphysical anomalies, such as barrier-free S = 2 surfaces, 10,11 electron transfer processes, artificial charge delocalization, 14 formation of charged organic intermediates due to hydride abstractions instead of the experimentally observed hydrogen atom abstraction (HAT), 6 and discontinuities in the potential energy profiles. 10,15 These anomalies were invincibly shown 14,16,17 to originate in the self-interaction error inherent in DFT. As such, an important class of these bioinorganic reactions cannot be confidently studied with DFT unless these anomalies can be evaded. Siegbahn et al. 14,16 have suggested that the anomalies can be muted by masking the charge of the iron oxo reagent, for example, by using counterions. 14 In this Letter, we report the boon of incorporating counterions in the UB3LYP calculations of the reactions, depicted in Scheme 1, of the synthetic complex 6 [N4PyFe IV O] 2+ with cyclohexadiene, with which all of the above anomalies manifest with the bare oxidant (model 1), and cyclohexane, for which the anomalies appear after the first HAT, in the follow-up steps in Scheme 1a. As shall be shown, adding the two ClO 4À counterions (model 2) as in the [N4PyFe II (CH 3 CN)](ClO 4 ) 2 crystal structure 18 removes the anomalies and creates smooth energy profiles that enable one to study the entire stepwise processes in Scheme 1a, explore various reaction trajectories (σ/π) 9b,19À21 of the rate-limiting HAT step, offer unequivocal characterization of the reaction intermediates, assess and derive coherent reactivity Scheme 1. (a) Reactions Studied Using (b) Oxidant Models 1, 1-solv, and 2 (1-solv Signifies That All Species Are Optimized in the Solvent) and (c) Two Substrates a a Reb and 2H are abbreviated processes.