BackgroundGastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors of the digestive tract and is the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) has been associated with approximately 10% of the total cases of gastric carcinomas. No previous study has analyzed the prevalence of EBV infection in gastric cancer of the Portuguese population.MethodsIn the present study, we have analyzed 82 gastric carcinoma cases and 33 healthy individuals (control group) from Coimbra region for the presence of EBV by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and by in situ hybridization (ISH) for EBV-encoded small RNAs (EBERs). The status of H. pylori infection was assessed by serology and by PCR.ResultsEBV was detected by PCR in 90.2% of stomach cancer cases, whereas EBERs were detected in 11%. In our series, EBV-associated gastric carcinoma (EBVaGC) were significantly associated with gender and the majority of them presented lymph node metastasis. These cases were generally graded in more advanced pTNM stages and, non-surprisingly, showed worse survival. H. pylori infection was detected in 62.2% of the gastric cancers and 64.7% of these patients were CagA+. On the other hand, the H. pylori prevalence was higher in the EBV-negative gastric carcinomas (64.4%) than in those carcinoma cases with EBV+ (44.4%).ConclusionsThe present study shows that prevalence of EBVaGC among Portuguese population is in accordance with the worldwide prevalence. EBV infection seems to be associated to poorer prognostic and no relation to H. pylori infection has been found. Conversely, the presence of H. pylori seems to have a favourable impact on patient’s survival. Our results emphasize that geographic variation can contribute with new epidemiological data on the association of EBV with gastric cancer.

From December 2019 to March 2020, China was the epicenter of the SARS‐CoV‐2 infection pandemic, but from that moment on, Europe surpassed China in the number of new cases and deaths related to this novel viral respiratory infection. The emergence of this world pandemic is particularly important for solid organ transplant recipients, who might have an increased risk of mortality, not only due to their chronic immunosuppression status, but also to the cardiovascular risk that correlates with several years of chronic kidney disease. To the extent that there is still a lack of knowledge about the clinical characteristics, evolution, and prognosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in kidney transplant recipients, we will report the first 5 cases diagnosed and followed in our transplant unit, as well as share the therapeutic strategies adopted.

We comparatively evaluate the in vitro activity of a drug combination consisting of a carbapenem (imipenem) and a novel inhibitor of beta-lactamases (relebactam), a mechanism that destroys beta-lactam antibiotics. We assess the activity against a collection of Enterobacterales clinical isolates recovered from difficult-to-treat infections in patients admitted to different intensive care units in Portugal and Spain.

Objectives To study the in vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam and comparators and the imipenem/relebactam resistance mechanisms in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa collection from Portugal (STEP, 2017–18) and Spain (SUPERIOR, 2016–17) surveillance studies. Methods P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 474) were prospectively recovered from complicated urinary tract (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal (cIAI) and lower respiratory tract (LRTI) infections in 11 Portuguese and 8 Spanish ICUs. MICs were determined (ISO broth microdilution). All imipenem/relebactam-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 30) and a subset of imipenem/relebactam-susceptible strains (n = 32) were characterized by WGS. Results Imipenem/relebactam (93.7% susceptible), ceftazidime/avibactam (93.5% susceptible) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (93.2% susceptible) displayed comparable activity. The imipenem/relebactam resistance rate was 6.3% (Portugal 5.8%; Spain 8.9%). Relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility to 76.9% (103/134) of imipenem-resistant isolates, including MDR (82.1%; 32/39), XDR (68.8%; 53/77) and difficult-to-treat (DTR) isolates (67.2%; 45/67). Among sequenced strains, differences in population structure were detected depending on the country: clonal complex (CC)175 and CC309 in Spain and CC235, CC244, CC348 and CC253 in Portugal. Different carbapenemase gene distributions were also found: VIM-20 (n = 3), VIM-1 (n = 2), VIM-2 (n = 1) and VIM-36 (n = 1) in Spain and GES-13 (n = 13), VIM-2 (n = 3) and KPC-3 (n = 2) in Portugal. GES-13-CC235 (n = 13) and VIM type-CC175 (n = 5) associations were predominant in Portugal and Spain, respectively. Imipenem/relebactam showed activity against KPC-3 strains (2/2), but was inactive against all GES-13 producers and most of the VIM producers (8/10). Mutations in genes affecting porin inactivation, efflux pump overexpression and LPS modification might also be involved in imipenem/relebactam resistance. Conclusions Microbiological results reinforce imipenem/relebactam as a potential option to treat cUTI, cIAI and LRTI caused by MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa isolates, except for GES-13 and VIM producers.

No abstract