Objectives: Pain assessment by clinicians can be difficult as it is subjective and depends on the patient›s self-report. The aims of this study were to evaluate the validity and reliability of a pain-rating scale; the full cup test (FCT), and to compare its performance to other scales in assessing pain following dental surgery. The ease of using these pain scales were compared. Study design: Forty-three patients who have had different dental surgeries were included. All patients asked to complete five pain scales: Faces pain scale, numeric rating scale, visual analog scale, verbal rating scale, and FCT for seven consecutive days starting on the day of the surgery. The analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA test), correlation between different scales (Pearson correlation), and reliability (Cronbach alpha) of FCT were evaluated. Results: The scales correlated highly with each other (P < 0.001). The FCT was highly reliable (Cronbach›s Alpha= .970) and was found to be the easiest scale to use. Conclusion: The FCT is valid, reliable and relatively easy to use pain scale in this group of patients. It can be used to assess pain intensity interchangeably with other pain rating scales.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.