Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging infectious disease caused by a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and first reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Since the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in 2003, Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH) in Singapore has routinely fit-tested staff for high-filtration N95 respirators and established Web-based staff surveillance systems. The routine systems were enhanced in response to Singapore’s first imported COVID-19 case on 23 January 2020. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study from 23 January to 23 February 2020 among healthcare workers to evaluate the effectiveness of the staff protection and surveillance strategy in TTSH, a 1600-bed multidisciplinary acute-care hospital colocated with the 330-bed National Centre for Infectious Diseases (NCID). As of 23 February 2020, TTSH/NCID has managed 76% of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Singapore. The hospital adopted a multipronged approach to protect and monitor staff with potential COVID-19 exposures: (1) risk-based personal protective equipment, (2) staff fever and sickness surveillance, and (3) enhanced medical surveillance of unwell staff. Results A total of 10 583 staff were placed on hospitalwide fever and sickness surveillance, with 1524 frontline staff working in COVID-19 areas under close surveillance. Among frontline staff, a median of 8 staff illness episodes was seen per day; almost 10% (n = 29) resulted in hospitalization. None of the staff was found to be infected with COVID-19. Conclusions A robust staff protection and health surveillance system that is routinely implemented during non–outbreak periods and enhanced during the COVID-19 outbreak is effective in protecting frontline staff from the infection.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are an important cause of nosocomial infections in acute-care hospitals (ACHs), intermediate-care facilities (ITCFs), and long-term care facilities (LTCFs). This study contemporaneously compared the epidemiology and risk factors for VRE colonization in different care settings in a health care network. We conducted a serial cross-sectional study in a 1,700-bed ACH and its six closely affiliated ITCFs and LTCFs in June and July of 2014 to 2016. Rectal swab or stool specimens were cultured for VRE. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess for independent risk factors associated with VRE colonization. Of 5,357 participants, 523 (9.8%) were VRE colonized. VRE prevalence was higher in ACHs (14.2%) than in ITCFs (7.6%) and LTCFs (0.8%). Common risk factors between ACHs and ITCFs included prior VRE carriage, a longer duration of antibiotic therapy, surgery in the preceding 90 days, and the presence of a skin ulcer. Independent risk factors specific to ACH-admitted patients were prior methicillin-resistant carriage, a higher number of beds per room, prior proton pump inhibitor use, and a length of stay of>14 days. For ITCFs, a length of stay of >14 days was inversely associated with VRE colonization. Similarities and differences in risk factors for VRE colonization were observed between health care settings. VRE prevention efforts should target the respective high-risk patients.

Objectives. With the widespread use of antiseptics in healthcare facilities for the prevention of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission, there are concerns for antiseptic tolerance and resistance. We sought to understand the use of chlorhexidine and octenidine, qac genes carriage and reduced antiseptic susceptibilities. Methods. A serial cross-sectional study was conducted in an acute care hospital and three extended-care facilities of a healthcare network in June-July, 2014-2016. Two of the extended-care facilities were exposed to intranasal octenidine and universal daily chlorhexidine/octenidine bathing. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) levels and qac genes were determined by broth microdilution tests and whole genome sequencing respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess for the independent associations between antiseptic exposures, qac genes and reduced antiseptic susceptibilities. Results. A total of 878 MRSA isolates were obtained. There were associations between qacA/B carriage and chlorhexidine (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 7.80; 95% confidence interval [

Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for severe dengue in adults, but few studies have examined the association between metformin use and disease severity in dengue. In addition to its effect on glucose control, metformin has been associated with pleiotropic properties in preclinical studies. Using a cohort of laboratory-confirmed adult (≥21 years) dengue patients with diabetes mellitus admitted to Tan Tock Seng Hospital, we conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 131 (58.7%) metformin users and 92 (41.3%) non-users. Dengue severity was categorized as dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) or dengue shock syndrome (DSS) in World Health Organization (WHO) 1997 criteria and severe dengue (SD) in WHO 2009 criteria. Multivariable Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to estimate risk ratio (RR). Compared with non-use, metformin use was associated with a decreased risk of developing severe dengue (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37–0.98, P = 0.04). Additionally, there was an inverse dose-response relationship (aRR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49–0.98, P = 0.04) with dengue severity as classified by WHO 2009 criteria. Use of metformin, however, was not associated with dengue severity based on WHO 1997 criteria; and no dose-response relationship was noted. Our results suggest metformin use could attenuate disease severity in dengue-infected diabetes mellitus individuals.

Objectives The first large nosocomial cluster of COVID-19 in Singapore in April 2021 led to partial closure of a major acute-care hospital. We report our investigations and evaluate the effectiveness of the BNT162.b2 and mRNA1273 vaccines against the Delta variant. Methods Close contacts of COVID-19 patients and the affected ward were identified and underwent surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patient, staff and visitor cohorts were constructed and factors associated with infection evaluated. Phylogenetic analysis of patient samples was performed. Ward air exhaust filters were tested for SARS-CoV-2 virus. Results There were 47 cases in total, comprising 29 patients, 9 staff, 6 ward visitors and 3 household contacts. All infections were of the Delta variant. Ventilation studies showed turbulent airflow and swabs from air exhaust filters were positive for SARS-Cov2. Vaccine breakthrough infections were seen in both patients and staff. Among patients, vaccination was associated with a 79% lower odds of infection with COVID-19 (adjusted OR =0.21, 95%CI 0.05-0.95) Conclusions This cluster occurred despite an enhancement in infection control measures that the hospital had undertaken at the onset of this pandemic, but it was rapidly brought under control through case isolation, extensive contact tracing and quarantine measures, and led to enhancements in hospital personal protective equipment (PPE) use, introduction of routine rostered testing of inpatients and staff, and hospital infrastructure changes to improve ventilation within the general ward.

Current knowledge of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonisation in relation to epidemiological characteristics is incomplete. We conducted a cross-sectional study at an acute-care tertiary infectious diseases hospital of MRSA isolates identified through routine surveillance from January 2009 to December 2011. We randomly selected 205 MRSA isolates (119 inpatients) from 798 isolates (427 inpatients) for molecular profiling using multilocus sequence typing. Multilevel multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) assessing the predilection of MRSA strains for anatomic sites, and associations of strains with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The most frequent sequence types (STs) were 239, 22 and 45. The proportion of ST22 increased over the sampling period, replacing ST239 as the dominant lineage. However, ST239 remained the most prevalent among HIV-seropositive individuals who were six times more likely to be colonised with this strain than non-HIV patients (adjusted OR (aOR) 6.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.94-21.36). ST45 was >24 times more likely to be associated with perianal colonisation than in the nares, axillae and groin sites (aOR 24.20, 95% CI 1.45-403.26). This study underlines the clonal replacement of MRSA in Singapore as previously reported but revealed, in addition, key strain differences between HIV-infected and non-infected individuals hospitalised in the same environment.

No abstract

Objectives: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has spread across countries and health care settings, with different clones occupying different ecological niches. It is crucial to understand the comparative epidemiology of MRSA clones between healthcare settings and independent factors asso ciated with colonization of specific clones. Methods: We conducted annual cross sectional surveillance studies in a network comprising an acute care hospital and six closely affiliated intermediate and long term care facilities in Singapore be tween June and July, 2014 2016; 5394 patients contributed 16 045 nasal, axillary and groin samples for culture and MRSA isolates for whole genome sequencing. Multivariable multilevel multinomial regres sion models were constructed to assess independent factors associated with MRSA colonization. Results: MRSA clonal complex (CC) 22 was more prevalent in the acute care hospital (n ¼ 256/493; 51.9%) and intermediate care facilities (n ¼ 348/634; 54.9%) than in long term care (n ¼ 88/351; 25.1%) facilities, with clones other than CC22 and CC45 being more prevalent in long term care facilities (n ¼ 144/351; 41.0%) (p < 0.001). Groin colonization with CC45 was six times that of nasal colonization (aOR 6.21, 95%CI 4.26 9.01). Prior MRSA carriage was associated with increased odds of current MRSA colonization in all settings, with a stronger association with CC22 (aOR 6.45, 95%CI 3.85 10.87) than CC45 (aOR 4.15, 95%CI 2.26 7.58). Conclusions: Colonization by MRSA clones differed between anatomical sites and across healthcare settings. With CC22 having a predilection for the nares and CC45 the groin, MRSA screening should include both sites. Prior MRSA carriage is a risk factor for colonization with predominant MRSA clones in the acute care hospital and intermediate and long term care facilities. Contact precautions for prior MRSA carriers on admission to any healthcare facility could prevent intra and inter institutional MRSA transmission.