The least‐cost method of removing arsenic may not be the best method all around.
The best arsenic treatment technique for a given utility will depend on arsenic concentration and species in source water, other constituents in the water, existing treatment processes, treatment costs, and handling of residuals. To evaluate these issues, a national survey investigated arsenic occurrence and speciation in US drinking water sources. In general, total arsenic concentration was higher in groundwater than in surface water supplies. Particulate arsenic was more abundant than previously suspected, and more arsenate than arsenite was present. The cost of arsenic treatment increased in the following order: modified conventional treatment << activated alumina or anion exchange < reverse osmosis. Nevertheless, the most cost‐effective treatment still might not be best, because secondary treatment benefits and residuals handling should also be taken into account.
A modified field technique can quantify particulate As, soluble As(III), and soluble As(V) in drinking water.
Several problems with commonly used techniques that analyze for arsenic are reported, and solutions are proposed. Analytical techniques can accurately detect <0.5 μg/L total arsenic if certain conditions are met: iron, nitrate, and other interferences are overcome in hydride generation techniques, poor recoveries are overcome in graphite furnace atomic adsorption techniques, and chloride interferences are accounted for in inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry techniques. Because no techniques adequately preserve arsenic species during storage, a speciation protocol that is fast (about 5 min/sample), relatively inexpensive (about $10/resin column), and user‐friendly and that can be applied in the field was developed. Particulate arsenic represents a significant fraction of total arsenic in drinking water.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.