No abstract

No abstract

The metabolism of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans involves electron transfer from the Fe+2 ions in the extracellular environment to the terminal oxygen in the bacterial cytoplasm through a series of periplasmic proteins like Rusticyanin (RCy), Cytochrome (Cyt c4), and Cytochrome oxidase (CcO). The energy minimization and MD studies reveal the stabilization of the three redox proteins in their ternary complex through the direct and water mediated H-bonds and electrostatic interaction. The surface exposed polar residues of the three proteins, i.e., RCy (His 143, Thr 146, Lys 81, Glu 20), Cyt c4 (Asp 5, 15, 52, Ser 14, Glu 61), and CcO (Asp 135, Glu 126, 140, 142, Thr 177) formed the intermolecular hydrogen bonds and stabilized the ternary complex. The oxygen (Oepsilon1) of Glu 126, 140, and 142 on subunit II of the CcO interact to the exposed side-chain and Ob atoms of the Asp 52 of Cyt c4 and Glu 20 and Leu 12 of RCy. The Asp 135 of subunit II also forms H-bond with the Nepsilon atom of Lys 81 of RCy. The Oepsilon1 of Glu 61 of Cyt c4 is also H-bonded to Ogamma atom of Thr 177 of CcO. Solvation followed by MD studies of the ternary protein complex revealed the presence of seven water molecules in the interfacial region of the interacting proteins. Three of the seven water molecules (W 79, W 437, and W 606) bridged the three proteins by forming the hydrogen bonded network (with the distances approximately 2.10-2.95 A) between the Lys 81 (RCy), Glu 61 (Cyt c4), and Asp 135 (CcO). Another water molecule W 603 was H-bonded to Tyr 122 (CcO) and interconnected the Lys 81 (RCy) and Asp 135 (CcO) through the water molecules W 606 and W 437. The other two water molecules (W 21 and W 455) bridged the RCy to Cyt c4 through H-bonds, whereas the remaining W 76 interconnected the His 53 (Cytc4) to Glu 126 (CcO) with distances approximately 2.95-3.0 A.

No abstract

No abstract

The main protease (Mpro) is the key enzyme of nCOVID-19 and plays a decisive role that makes it an attractive drug target. Multiple analysis of crystal structures reveal the presence of W1, W2, and W3 water locations in the active site pocket of Mpro; W1 and W2 are unstable and are weakly bonded with protein in comparison to W3 of Mpro-native. So, we adopt the water displacement method to occupy W1 or W2 sites by triggering HCQ or its analogs to inactivate the enzyme. Virtual screening is employed to find out best analogs of HCQ, molecular docking is used for water displacement from catalytic region of Mpro, and finally, MD simulations are conducted for validation of these findings. The docking study reveals that W1 and W2 are occupied by respective atoms of ZINC28706440 whereas W2 by HCQ and indacaterol. Finally, MD results demonstrate (i) HCQ occupies W1 and W2 positions but its analogs (indacaterol and ZINC28706440) are inadequate to retain either W1 or W2 (ii) His41 and Asp187 are stabilized by W3 in Mpro-native and His41, Cys145 and HCQ by W7 in ZINC28706440, and W4, W5, and W6 make water mediated bridge between indacaterol with His41. The structural, dynamical, and thermodynamic (WFP and J value) profiling parameters suggest that W3, W4, and W7 are prominent in their corresponding positions in comparison with W5 and W6. The final results conclude that ZINC28706440 may act as a best analog of HCQ with acceptable physico-chemical and toxicological scores and may further be synthesized for experimental validation.

Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) enzyme involves in the biosynthesis pathway of guanosine nucleotide. Type II isoform of the enzyme is selectively upregulated in neoplastic fast replicating lymphocytes and CML cancer cells. The hIMPDH-II is an excellent target for antileukemic agent. The detailed investigation during MD-Simulation (15 ns) of three different unliganded structures (1B3O, 1JCN and 1JR1) have clearly explored the salt bridge mediated stabilization of inter or intra domain (catalytic domains I(N), I(C) with res. Id. 28-111 and 233-504, whereas two CBS domains C₁, C₂ are 112-171 and 172-232) in IMPDH enzyme which are mostly inaccessible in their X-rays structures. The salt bridge interaction in I(N)---C₁ inter-domain of hIMPDH-I, I(N)---C₂ of IMPDH-II and C₁---I(C) of nhIMPDH-II are discriminative features among the isoforms. The I(N)---C₂ recognition in hIMPDH-II (1B3O) is missing in type-I isoform (1JCN). The salt bridge interaction D232---K238 at the surface of protein and the involvement of three conserved water molecules or the hydrophilic centers (WA²³²(OD1), WB ²³²(OD2) and W²³⁸(NZ)) to those acidic and basic residues seem to be unique in hIMPDH-II. The hydrophilic susceptibility, geometrical and electronic consequences of this salt bridge interaction could be useful to design the topology of specific inhibitor for hIMPDH-II which may not be effective for hIMPDH-I. Possibly, the aliphatic ligand containing carboxyl, amide or hydrophilic groups with flexible structure may be implicated for hIMPDH-II inhibitor design using the conserved water mimic drug design protocol.

Main protease (Mpro) is one of the key enzymes in the life cycle of SARS-CoV-2 that plays a pivotal role in mediating viral replication, transcription, and makes it an attractive drug target for this virus.  The catalytic site of this enzyme comprises of a dyad His41 and Cys145 and lacks the third catalytic residue, which is replaced by a stable water molecule (W). The computational structural analysis on crystal data for Mpro protein suggests that W1, W2, His163, and Tyr161 may also play a vital role in the activity of this enzyme and they may act as catalytic partners along with Cys(145)-His(41) catalytic dyad. The thiolate–imidazolium ion-pair between Cys145 (-SH---NE2-) His41 and Cys145 (-SH---NE2-) His163 have been stabilized by W1 (with W2) and Tyr161, respectively. Therefore, unique interactions of W2---W1---ND1-His41-NE2---SH-Cys145 or Cys145-SH---NE2-His163-ND1---OH-Tyr161 in Mpro serve as an excellent drug target for this enzyme and suggest a rethink of the conventional definition of chemical geometry of inhibitor binding site, its shape, and complementarities. Our computational hypothesis suggests two essential clues that may be implemented to design a new inhibitor for Mpro protein. The strategies are: (i) ligand should be occupied either W1 or W2 or both of these position to displace these water molecules from the catalytic region, and (ii) ligand should be made H-bonds with Cys145 (-SH), His41 (NE2/ND1) and His163(NE2) to inhibit Mpro. The results from this computational study could be of interest to the experimental community and also provide a testable hypothesis for experimental validation. Doi: 10.28991/SciMedJ-2020-02-SI-11 Full Text: PDF