The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has been detected in subsets of breast cancers. In order to elaborate on these observations, we quantified by real-time PCR (Q-PCR) the EBV genome in biopsy specimens of breast cancer tissue as well as in tumor cells isolated by microdissection. Our findings show that EBV genomes can be detected by Q-PCR in about half of tumor specimens, usually in low copy numbers. However, we also found that the viral load is highly variable from tumor to tumor. Moreover, EBV genomes are heterogeneously distributed in morphologically identical tumor cells, with some clusters of isolated tumor cells containing relatively high genome numbers while other tumor cells isolated from the same specimen may be negative for EBV DNA. Using reverse transcription-PCR, we detected EBV gene transcripts: EBNA-1 in almost all of the EBV-positive tumors and RNA of the EBV oncoprotein LMP-1 in a smaller subset of the tissues analyzed. Moreover, BARF-1 RNA was detected in half of the cases studied. Furthermore, we observed that in vitro EBV infection of breast carcinoma cells confers resistance to paclitaxel (taxol) and provokes overexpression of a multidrug resistance gene (MDR1). Consequently, even if a small number of breast cancer cells are EBV infected, the impact of EBV infection on the efficiency of anticancer treatment might be of importance.The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), a ubiquitous human herpesvirus, is associated with the development of different epithelial malignancies (28), including nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). It has also been linked with subsets of other types of carcinomas, including gastric carcinoma and lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma in salivary glands and thymus (32,44). Several laboratories have reported detection of EBV in a subset of breast tumors (3,10,19,23). However, negative results have also been reported (6,9,14,27). Nevertheless, in most of the studies, a low viral load was detected in breast cancer biopsy specimens but the infected cells were not clearly identified. In the study presented here, we used real-time PCR (Q-PCR) to quantify the copy numbers of the EBV genome in biopsy specimens as well as in microdissected tumor cells. The results show that breast cancer cells harbor the viral genome. However, through microdissection and isolation of pure tumor cells, we now find that even in EBV-positive tumor samples, many tumor cells do not contain EBV genomes and that the breast carcinomas are highly heterogeneous in terms of genome content and distribution. Moreover, using reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), we detected EBNA-1 and BARF-1 transcripts in almost all of the EBV-positive tumors and LMP-1 RNA in 3 of the 15 cases studied. The findings raise the possibility that although EBV is unlikely to have an etiologic role in the genesis of breast cancer, the virus might contribute to tumor progression. Finally, the potential impact of EBV in breast cancer progression was evaluated by estimation of resistance to chemotherapeutic agents on in vitro-infected MDA-MB-231 cells. The resul...
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is tightly associated with certain human cancers, but there is as yet no specific treatment against EBV-related diseases. The EBV-encoded EBNA1 protein is essential to maintain viral episomes and for viral persistence. As such, EBNA1 is expressed in all EBV-infected cells, and is highly antigenic. All infected individuals, including individuals with cancer, have CD8+ T cells directed towards EBNA1 epitopes, yet the immune system fails to detect and destroy cells harboring the virus. EBV immune evasion depends on the capacity of the Gly-Ala repeat (GAr) domain of EBNA1 to inhibit the translation of its own mRNA in cis, thereby limiting the production of EBNA1-derived antigenic peptides presented by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I pathway. Here we establish a yeast-based assay for monitoring GAr-dependent inhibition of translation. Using this assay we identify doxorubicin (DXR) as a compound that specifically interferes with the GAr effect on translation in yeast. DXR targets the topoisomerase-II–DNA complexes and thereby causes genomic damage. We show, however, that the genotoxic effect of DXR and various analogs thereof is uncoupled from the effect on GAr-mediated translation control. This is further supported by the observation that etoposide and teniposide, representing another class of topoisomerase-II–DNA targeting drugs, have no effect on GAr-mediated translation control. DXR and active analogs stimulate, in a GAr-dependent manner, EBNA1 expression in mammalian cells and overcome GAr-dependent restriction of MHC class I antigen presentation. These results validate our approach as an effective high-throughput screening assay to identify drugs that interfere with EBV immune evasion and, thus, constitute candidates for treating EBV-related diseases, in particular EBV-associated cancers.
Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-1) signal transduction has been implicated in many secondmessenger pathways, including the NF-B pathway. We provide evidence of a novel TGF-1-mediated pathway that leads to extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 phosphorylation, which in turn induces expression of an Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) protein, ZEBRA, that is responsible for the induction of the viral lytic cycle. This pathway includes two unexpected steps, both of which are required to control ERK 1/2 phosphorylation: first, a quick and transient activation of NF-B, and second, downregulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activity that requires the participation of NF-B activity. Although necessary, NF-B alone is not sufficient to produce downregulation of iNOS, suggesting that another uncharacterized event(s) is involved in this pathway. Dissection of the steps involved in the switch from the EBV latent cycle to the lytic cycle will be important to understand how virus-host relationships modulate the innate immune system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.