This article uses an ethnographic and case-study approach to examine aspects of egalitarianism between men and women in an American coed soccer league. We describe the formal adjustments of the league, the informal arrangements made by participants, and the conceptualization of the game by both male and female players. Our findings indicate that even in a highly egalitarian form, coed soccer remains dominated by males both on the pitch and in concept. Our results challenge the thesis of `American exceptionalism' about the failure of soccer to gain acceptance in the American sports scene. We also suggest that the involvement of men and women on the basis of egalitarianism and the unfulfilled promise of its enactment are consonant with patterns in American society at large. Furthermore, we maintain that the dominant meaning of American soccer can be best grasped by focusing on its recreational dimension rather than at the commodified level.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.