In recent decades, the major preoccupation of industrialists has shifted towards the production of ecological products, given the actual environmental issues on the environment. to overcome this problem, several methodologies have been proposed, notably regarding the valorization of End-of-Life (EoL) products. The study of relevant literature indicates that in order to successfully recover EoL products, a design for an easily disassembled product should be considered from the early design stages. Therefore, the objective of the work reported in this paper is to support designers firstly to evaluate the disassembly from the beginning of the design process notably during the conceptual design, based on the following four criteria: type of disassembly tools, accessibility and operator's posture during disassembly, disassembly time and the chosen EoL scenarios, and secondly to mark off the field of proposed concepts using the technique of reference concepts, which will help to delimite the scope of feasible alternatives and thus reject unfeasible alternatives from a disassembly point of view. An indicator was proposed to determine distance between a proposed concept and reference concepts, which represent the minimum acceptable. In order to prove the relevance of our approach, we applied it to an industrial case of three different concepts of a solar collector support. The results obtained allowed us to reduce the field of proposed solutions from three alternatives to two. Furthermore, the analysis of obtained results allowed us to extract some relevant recommendations to be made in the EoL strategy, in order to improve the disassembly performance of the rejected alternative. The evaluation results obtained after the modification of the EoL strategy allowed us to keep the alternative initially rejected after improving the criteria which had low scores compared to the reference concepts.
The decisions made during the preliminary design phases considerably impact the development of a product's lifecycle, acting on its environmental performance, cost, and duration of its realization. However, the lack of relevant information during these phases does not allow for the accurate evaluation of design solutions. In addition, it generates schedule delays and overruns in the budget allocated to developing a given solution. In this perspective, the present work aims to assess the accuracy of the behavior models used for exploring solutions during the embodiment phase. This was based on two measures of different nature, namely objective accuracy, which is evaluated by referring to real prototyping of a given solution, and the subjective accuracy measure, which allows to the expression of the degradation of the first measure in relation to the reference point. This combination will lead to a measure that can be generalized on all the design space. In a second step, the current work suggests an estimation of the effect of these models' accuracy on the proposed solutions' environmental impact. To this end, a sensitivity study was carried out on the input data of the model (design parameters) in order to deduce the effect of the results obtained (performance parameters) on the mass and, consequently, the environmental impact of the solution. In order to highlight the approach adopted in the present study, it was applied to a real industrial case, ultimately leading to the most optimized solution in terms of accuracy and environmental impact.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.