The purpose of the study was to evaluate the incidence of hand dermatitis, the impact of potential risk factors and the efficacy of skin bioengineering in a prospectively followed cohort of apprentice nurses. 104 participants were prospectively followed for 3 years. Before the start of training, after about 1 year and in the third year of occupational exposure, a standardized questionnaire was distributed, and a clinical examination with skin bioengineering of the dorsum of hand and forearm was performed. The 12-month period prevalence of self-reported symptoms of hand dermatitis was 36.5%[95%-confidence interval (CI) 27.3-46.6] at intermediate follow-up and 43.3% (95%-CI 33.6-53.3) at the final examination. Apprentices with self-reported symptoms at the final examination showed a significant increase of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) at the dorsal hand from 10.15 g/m2h to 13.55 g/m2h. TEWL at this site did, at the initial examination, not differ significantly between persons who later reported symptoms of hand dermatitis at the final examination and those who did not (10.50 g/m2h versus 10.15 g/m2h, respectively). Our results do not support the notion that an increased basal TEWL is a good indicator for hand dermatitis risk.
High concentrations of flour-specific IgE and clear SPT results in symptomatic bakers are good predictors for a positive challenge test. Challenge tests with flours may be avoided in strongly sensitized bakers.
Both previous occlusion and water exposure were capable of inducing higher susceptibility to SLS irritation. Skin hydration by occlusion had a different biological effect than water exposure. Short occlusions seem to harm the skin less than water exposure for the same duration.
Under workplace conditions, it is difficult to prove the influence of skin lesions on skin penetration by chemical substances. The aim of the present study was to show whether systemic exposure to glycol ether increases due to lesions of the skin in printing workers. 28 male printers, exposed to 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol (BEE), were interviewed about the workplace exposure by a standardized questionnaire. The systemic exposure in printers was determined by biological monitoring of the main metabolite of BEE butoxyethoxyacetic acid (BEAA) in urine. Furthermore, clinical examination of the skin, transepidermal water loss, capacitance and skin surface pH measurements were carried out. Erythema and scaliness were the most important factors showing an effect on dermal absorption. The mean urinary BEAA excretions for printers with skin lesions on the hands were higher (20.62 mg/l for scaliness and 14.40 mg/l for erythema) compared to that for printers without detectable skin lesions (12.08 mg/l for scaliness and 13.03 mg/l for erythema). Bioengineering measurements to predict skin strain and percutaneous absorption were only supportive. We were able to show that by using a multiple spectrum of methods an enhancement of percutaneous absorption of BEE could be demonstrated in workers with skin lesions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.