Proteins with expanded polyglutamine domains cause eight inherited neurodegenerative diseases, including Huntington's, but the molecular mechanism(s) responsible for neuronal degeneration are not yet established. Expanded polyglutamine domain proteins possess properties that distinguish them from the same proteins with shorter glutamine repeats. Unlike proteins with short polyglutamine domains, proteins with expanded polyglutamine domains display unique protein interactions, form intracellular aggregates, and adopt a novel conformation that can be recognized by monoclonal antibodies. Any of these polyglutamine length-dependent properties could be responsible for the pathogenic effects of expanded polyglutamine proteins. To identify peptides that interfere with pathogenic polyglutamine interactions, we screened a combinatorial peptide library expressed on M13 phage pIII protein to identify peptides that preferentially bind pathologic-length polyglutamine domains. We identified six tryptophan-rich peptides that preferentially bind pathologic-length polyglutamine domain proteins. Polyglutamine-binding peptide 1 (QBP1) potently inhibits polyglutamine protein aggregation in an in vitro assay, while a scrambled sequence has no effect on aggregation. QBP1 and a tandem repeat of QBP1 also inhibit aggregation of polyglutamine-yellow fluorescent fusion protein in transfected COS-7 cells. Expression of QBP1 potently inhibits polyglutamine-induced cell death. Selective inhibition of pathologic interactions of expanded polyglutamine domains with themselves or other proteins may be a useful strategy for preventing disease onset or for slowing progression of the polyglutamine repeat diseases.Eight inherited neurodegenerative diseases, including Huntington's disease, dentatorubral pallidoluysian atrophy, spinobulbar muscular atrophy, and spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7, are caused by expanded CAG repeats in the coding region of the disease genes (1-3). The CAG codon is translated into glutamine, and the polyglutamine domain is the only region of homology among the eight disease proteins. The length of the repeat is the critical determinant of age-of-disease onset, with repeat length greater than 40 glutamines producing neurodegeneration in seven of the eight diseases (1-3).Proteins with pathologic-length polyglutamine domains display novel properties that are not present in these proteins when they contain a shorter polyglutamine domain. Length-dependent polyglutamine-protein interactions are reported for Huntington-associated protein 1, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, leucine-rich acidic nuclear protein, vimentin, neurofilament, apopain, calmodulin, WW domain proteins, and Ras-related nuclear protein/ARA24 (4 -12). Proteins with expanded polyglutamine domains also aggregate, and aggregation is a pathologic hallmark of the polyglutamine repeat diseases (13,14). These polyglutamine length-dependent properties may arise from the ability of long polyglutamine domains to adopt unique three-dimensional confor...

The A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) contributes to the cytoprotective action of adenosine under conditions known to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS). Pharmacological manipulation of A1AR expression has been shown to modulate this cytoprotective role. In this study, we provide evidence that ROS generated could increase the expression of the A1AR and thereby offset the detrimental effects of ROS. Incubation of DDT1MF-2 smooth muscle cells with ROS-generating chemotherapeutic agents, such as cisplatin (2.5 microM) or H2O2 (10 microM), elicited an increase in A1AR expression within 24 hr. The induction by H2O2 was reduced by the ROS scavenger catalase but not superoxide dismutase. Inhibition of nuclear factor kappa B (NF kappa B) by pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (200 microM), dexamethasone (100 nM), or genistein (1 microM) abrogated the cisplatin-mediated increase in A1AR. Cisplatin promoted rapid translocation of NF kappa B (but not AP-1) to the nucleus, as detected by electrophoretic mobility shift assays and by Western blotting. A putative NF kappa B sequence in the A1AR promoter effectively competed with labeled kappa B probe for binding in nuclear preparations derived from DDT1MF-2 cells. Transient transfection of DDT1MF-2 cells with the A1AR promoter coupled to firefly luciferase reporter gene led to cisplatin-inducible and pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate-sensitive luciferase activity, suggesting the presence of functional NF kappa B binding site(s) in the A1AR promoter sequence. Treatment of cells with (R)-phenylisopropyladenosine (1 microM), an agonist of the A1AR, reduced cisplatin-mediated lipid peroxidation, which was reversed after blockade of the A1AR. These data suggest that ROS can increase the expression of the A1AR by activating NF kappa B regulatory site(s) on this gene and thereby enhance the cytoprotective role of adenosine.

No abstract

The human Al adenosine receptor gene contains six exons with exons 1, 2, 3, 4, and part of 5 representing 5' untranslated regions. Reverse transcription-PCR with exon-

No abstract

The expression of the human A1 adenosine receptor gene is controlled by two promoters, promoters A and B, and they are located 600 base pairs apart. The characteristics of the two promoters differ by the activity of expression, tissue specificity, and the potential regulatory elements around them. Promoter A is more active but its expression is observed only in selected tissues, whereas promoter B is constitutively expressed but at much reduced levels. In Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transiently transfected with plasmids containing either promoter linked to a reporter gene, dexamethasone (dex) can stimulate (or enhance) the expression of promoter B much more effectively than that of promoter A. Mutation and deletion studies on plasmids containing promoter B have shown that the stimulation is mediated through multiple regulatory sites, including a serum response element, AP1, and TATA box. However, a single-glucocorticoid response element monomer-binding site between promoters A and B does not have significant contribution to dex-regulated expression. The interactions between glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and some regulatory sites are probably occurring via this protein (GR) interacting with other DNA-binding proteins because there is no GR DNA-binding sequence in the sites studied. The stimulation can be eliminated by mifepristone, an antagonist of GR, indicating the involvement of GR in gene regulation. In addition, dex treatment also stimulated the expression of A1 adenosine receptors in CHO cells transfected with the plasmids containing contiguous genomic sequences of promoter B or promoters A and B linked to the receptor-coding sequence. When promoter A is active and both promoter A and B are present in a construct, dex treatment induced a much smaller percentage of stimulation.

Human A1 adenosine receptor gene expression is controlled by two independent promoters. The upstream promoter, promoter A, is subject to tissue specific regulation because not all cells express the mRNA associated with this promoter. One potential regulatory sequence located downstream of the TATA box is an AGG element appearing in a tandem repeat. In a previous study, transient transfection assays showed that mutations made in those AGG elements substantially reduced promoter activity. In the current study, DNase I footprinting indicated nuclear protein binding to this sequence between the TATA box and transcriptional start site. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay confirmed further the presence of an AGG element binding protein (AGBP) in human brain nuclear protein extracts. This binding protein has much higher affinity for single-stranded than for double-stranded DNA, and the binding is sequence specific. A series of assays also showed that AGBP is not related to the nuclear factor SP1 and the binding does not require metal cofactors. Therefore, AGBP is likely to be a specific single-stranded DNA binding protein that is required for the full expression of A1 adenosine receptor gene and particularly abundant in brain tissue.

In the present study we sought to identify genetic variation in the adenosine A1 receptor (A1AR) gene on chromosome 1q31-32.1, which through alteration of protein function or level of expression might contribute to the genetic predisposition to bipolar affective disorder. We performed a systematic mutation scan of the whole coding sequence as well as 5' and 3' untranslated regions by means of single-strand conformation analysis. The region upstream to the coding sequence we investigated contains two functional promoters. Screening 42 patients with bipolar affective disorder, we detected 11 DNA sequence variants (48T/A, 267 + 275C/T, 805T/G, 1777C/A, 1827C/T, 1904C/T, 2126G/T, 2294insT, 2776C/T, 2777del36, 2819T/G). Determining the frequency of these variants in 42 anonymous blood donors, we observed a non-significant (P < 0.06) trend towards an underrepresentation of the 2126T variant in patients when compared to controls. On the other hand, the 2777del36 and the 2819G variant were not found among the controls. These findings were followed up in a large independent replication sample. However, we were not able to confirm the initial findings in the second sample. Our data suggest that genetically determined variation of the A1AR and its two promoters do not play a major role in the development of bipolar affective disorder.