Background: Thrombus embolization and microvascular obstruction during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is commonly detected, which causes inadequate myocardial perfusion and elevated infarct size. An approach with low-dose intracoronary fibrinolytic treatment for reducing distal embolization and improving myocardial reperfusion in high-risk STEMI cases remains controversial. Methods:The RECOVER II study represents a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial assessing low-dose adjunctive intracoronary reteplase during primary PCI in individuals with large anterior myocardial infarction and thrombus determined by angiography. The trial will enroll 306 cases who present within 12 h following STEMI for proximal or mid left anterior descending artery occlusion undergoing primary PCI. Cases will be randomized to receive a bolus intracoronary reteplase at 9 mg or 18 mg vs. placebo. The drug will be delivered over 2 minutes proximal to culprit lesions with an intracoronary catheter early after wire-crossing and before thrombus aspiration or balloon dilation. Results:The primary outcome will be infarct size assessed by late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (% of left ventricular mass) on day 7 after enrollment. Secondary outcomes will include the amount of microvascular obstruction and myocardial salvage index examined via MRI on day 7, angiographic measures of reperfusion [Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) coronary flow grade, TIMI frames count and myocardial blush grade], incidence of complete ST-segment resolution at 2 hours after reperfusion, area under the curve for troponin T, and rates of major adverse cardiovascular events at 30 days.Conclusions: RECOVER II will determine whether the addition of low-dose intracoronary reteplase early after wire-crossing as an adjunct to reperfusion treatment reduces infarct size in individuals with large anterior myocardial infarction.
BackgroundAtherosclerosis (AS) risk is elevated in diabetic patients, but the underlying mechanism such as involvement of epigenetic control of foam macrophages remains unclear. We have previously shown the importance of immune regulation on endothelial cells to AS development in diabetes. In this study, we examined the hypothesis that diabetes may promote AS through modification of the epigenetic status of macrophages.MethodsWe employed the Laser Capture Microdissection (LCM) method to evaluate the expression levels of key epigenetic regulators in both endothelial cells and macrophages at the AS lesions of patients. We then assessed the correlation between the significantly altered epigenetic regulator and serum levels of low-density Lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides (TRIG) and high-density Lipoprotein (HDL) in patients. In vitro, the effects of high glucose on glucose utilization, lactate production, succinate levels, oxygen consumption and polarization in either undifferentiated or differentiated bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) were analyzed. The effects of depleting this significantly altered epigenetic regulator in macrophages on AS development were assessed in AS-prone diabetic mice.ResultsHistone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) was identified as the most significantly altered epigenetic regulator in macrophages from the AS lesions in human diabetic patients. The levels of HDAC3 positively correlated with high serum LDL and TRIG, as well as low serum HDL. High glucose significantly increased glucose utilization, lactate production, succinate levels and oxygen consumption in cultured macrophages, and induced proinflammatory M1-like polarization. Macrophage depletion of HDAC3 significantly attenuated AS severity in AS-prone diabetic mice.ConclusionEpigenetically altered macrophages promote development of diabetes-associated AS, which could be prevented through HDAC3 depletion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.