Reliability of safety instrumented systems (SISs) is a critical measure to ensure production safety of many industries. This paper focus on low-demand SISs. The reliability of these SISs is quantified by evaluating their probability of failure on demand (PFD). However, due to lack of knowledge, and/or vague judgments from experts, epistemic uncertainty associated with the parameters of components' degradation models is inevitable. Meanwhile, common cause failure (CCF) of two or more components caused by shared environments, often exists in SISs, reliability assessment for a SIS, therefore, becomes a challenging task. In this paper, fuzzy reliability assessment for SISs is conducted by taking account of the CCF among components of a SIS. The fuzzy Markov model is utilized to characterize the degradation process of components under fuzzy environment. The fuzzy state probability distribution of components is, then, calculated by formulating a set of constrained optimization models. Based on the fault tree of a SIS, the fuzzy PFD of the entire SIS with CCFs is formulated by using the -factor to quantify the CCFs. The fuzzy PFD at any -cut level is, therefore, computed by a constrained optimization model. According to the optimization of parameters of SIS, the lower bound and upper bound of fuzzy PFD of SIS can be determined. Finally, we can quantify the effectiveness of CCF event for assessing the fuzzy PFD of SIS.
Reliability assessment of multi-component systems under competing degradation and random shocks has been intensively investigated in recent years. In most cases, the parameters associated with competing degradation and random shocks are represented by crisp values. However, due to insufficient data and vague judgments from experts, it may produce epistemic uncertainty with those parameters and they are befitting to be described as fuzzy numbers. In this article, the internal degradation is treated as a continuous monotonically increasing random process with respect to operating time, whereas the amount of cumulative damage produced by each external random shock is modeled by a geometric process. As components in a system suffer the same environmental condition, an external random shock will produce different amounts of cumulative damage to each component simultaneously. Each component fails when either the internal degradation or cumulative damage from the random shocks, whichever comes first, exceeds its corresponding random thresholds. Moreover, the parameters associated with the internal degradation and the random shocks are represented by triangular fuzzy numbers. The fuzzy reliability functions of components and the entire system are evaluated by a set of optimization models. A multi-component system, together with some comparative results, is presented to illustrate the implementation of the proposed method.
Advanced engineering systems possess a large number of components with complicated failure dependencies. To accurately assess the system reliability, the degradation models of components should be known in advance and the model parameters should be accurately estimated via a large quantity of historical time-to-failure data. In real-world situations, due to limited data, lack of knowledge, and vague judgments from experts, components' degradation model parameters are, however, inevitably encountered with epistemic uncertainty and oftentimes quantified as evidential variables. In this article, upper and lower bounds of system reliability, termed as reliability-box, are estimated when components' degradation model parameters are elicited from experts and quantified by evidential variables. In the first place, the constrained optimization model is leveraged to assess the reliability-box of each component by giving the evidential variable of the component's degradation model parameters. Next, based on the system structure, the evidential network of the system is constructed to propagate the epistemic uncertainty from the component level to the system level. Therefore, the focal elements of the evidential variable of system reliability, i.e., the system reliability bounds, can be assessed via the belief and plausibility functions to the mass function of the leaf node of the evidential network. The effectiveness of the proposed methods is demonstrated by a rolling system in the chip cutting detection module.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.