Although dependent on the integrity of a central pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus (SCN), endogenous daily (circadian) rhythms are expressed in a wide variety of peripheral organs. The pathways by which the pacemaker controls the periphery are unclear. Here, we used parabiosis between intact and SCN-lesioned mice to show that nonneural (behavioral or bloodborne) signals are adequate to maintain circadian rhythms of clock gene expression in liver and kidney, but not in heart, spleen, or skeletal muscle. These results indicate that the SCN regulates expression of circadian oscillations in different peripheral organs by diverse pathways.A wide variety of physiological events and behaviors exhibit pronounced endogenous daily (circadian) rhythms. Experimental destruction of the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus (SCN) results in arrhythmicity that is reversed by neurotransplantation of this structure. Persistence of rhythmicity depends on the operation of transcriptional-translational feedback loops among the products of critical genes, including Per1, Per2, and Bmal1 within the SCN. Circadian oscillations of Per1, Per2, and Bmal1 also occur in a variety of peripheral organs. Evidence has accumulated for both neural and humoral control of peripheral rhythms. For example, serum shock initiates oscillations of mPer1 expression in cultured hepatocytes and HeLa cells (1), and implants of fibroblasts that receive no innervation adopt the circadian phase of the host (2). Endocrine signals, including glucocorticoids, angiotensin II, and retinoic acid can shift the phase of peripheral clock gene expression (3-5). In addition, metabolites such as glucose may directly entrain peripheral oscillators or act indirectly to induce endocrine signals that regulate circadian rhythms of gene expression (6). On the other hand, the autonomic innervation of peripheral organs provides a potential pathway for entrainment (7-9). For example, SCN lesions that compromise catecholamine rhythms eliminate oscillations of clock gene expression in mouse liver (10).Neural and endocrine pathways for peripheral entrainment are not mutually exclusive. Furthermore, different organs may vary in their dependence on one or another entraining signal. Such variation is not without precedent. Whereas behavioral rhythms appear to depend on humoral outputs of the SCN (11), endocrine rhythms may rely on axonal projections (12).The technique of parabiosis offers unique advantages for investigation of the importance of blood-borne cues in the control of a variety of physiologic systems. This approach has been exploited in the study of cockroach circadian rhythms (13). Despite its useful application to study of metabolic signals in mice (14, 15), the effect on peripheral circadian rhythms of establishing vascular exchange without neural communication has not previously been investigated in vertebrates. We now report that parabiotic linkage of SCN-lesioned mice to intact partners reinstates circadian rhythmicity in some, but not o...

Neurotransplantation of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) was used to assess communication between the central circadian pacemaker and peripheral oscillators in Syrian hamsters. Free-running rhythms of haPer1, haPer2, and Bmal1 expression were documented in liver, kidney, spleen, heart, skeletal muscle, and adrenal medulla after 3 d or 11 weeks of exposure to constant darkness. Ablation of the SCN of heterozygote tau mutants eliminated not only rhythms of locomotor activity but also rhythmic expression of these genes in all peripheral organs studied. The Per:Bmal ratio suggests that this effect was attributable not to asynchronous rhythmicity between SCN-lesioned individuals but to arrhythmicity within individuals. Grafts of wild-type SCN to heterozygous, SCN-lesioned tau mutant hamsters not only restored locomotor rhythms with the period of the donor but also led to recovery of rhythmic expression of haPer1, haPer2, and haBmal1 in liver and kidney. The phase of these rhythms most closely resembled that of intact wild-type hamsters. Rhythmic gene expression was also restored in skeletal muscle, but the phase was altered. Behaviorally effective SCN transplants failed to reinstate rhythms of clock gene expression in heart, spleen, or adrenal medulla. These findings confirm that peripheral organs differ in their response to SCN-dependent cues. Furthermore, the results indicate that conventional models of internal entrainment may need to be revised to explain control of the periphery by the pacemaker.

The molecular biology of circadian rhythms has been extensively studied in mice, and the widespread expression of canonical circadian clock genes in peripheral organs is well established in this species. In contrast, much less information about the peripheral expression of haPer1, haPer2, and haBmal1 is available in Syrian hamsters despite the fact that this species is widely used for studies of circadian organization and photoperiodic responses. Furthermore, examination of oscillating expression of these genes in mouse testis has generated discrepant results, and little is known about gonadal expression of haPer1 and haBmal1 or their environmental control. To address these questions, the authors examined the pattern of haPer1 and haBmal1 in heart, kidney, liver, muscle, spleen, and testis of hamsters exposed to DD. In most organs, Northern blots suggested the existence of single transcripts of each of these messenger RNAs (mRNAs). haPer1 peaked in late subjective day and haBmal1 during the late subjective night. Closer inspection of SCN and muscle haPer1, however, revealed the existence of two major transcripts of similar size, as well as minor transcripts that varied in the 3′-untranslated region. In hamster testis, two haPer1 transcripts were found, both of which are truncated relative to the corresponding mouse transcript and both of which contain a sequence homologous to intron 18 of mPer1. Neither testis transcript contains a nuclear localization signal, and haPer1 transcripts lacked the putative C-terminal CRY1-binding domain. Furthermore, the testis deviated from the general pattern in that haPer1 and haBmal1 both peaked in the subjective night. In situ hybridization revealed that haPer1, but not haBmal1, showed a heterogeneous distribution among seminiferous tubules. Hamster testis also expresses 2 haPer2 transcripts, but no circadian variation is evident. In a second experiment, long-term exposure to DD sufficient to induce gonadal regression was found to eliminate circadian oscillations of both testicular haPer1 transcripts. In contrast, gonadal regression was accompanied by a more robust rhythm of haBmal1.