Diabetic nephropathy (DN), which is correlated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, significantly elevates the morbidity and mortality of patients with diabetes. Recently, the benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in chronic kidney disease (CKD), such as their anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties, have been discovered. Thus, the present meta-analysis aimed to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of eplerenone treatment in patients with DN. Six electronic databases—PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), and CBM(Chinese BioMedical Literature Database)—were searched to retrieve randomized controlled trials that assessed eplerenone treatment in patients with DN and were published up to July 31, 2021. Eight randomized controlled trials involving 838 patients were included. Between the eplerenone treatment groups and controls, significant differences were identified in 24-h urine protein levels (mean difference [MD], −19.63 [95% CI, −23.73 to −15.53], P < 0.00001), microalbuminuria (MD, -7.75 [95% CI, -9.75 to -5.75], P < 0.00001), urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (MD, -48.29 [95% CI, -64.45 to -32.14], P < 0.00001), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD, -2.49 [95% CI, -4.48 to -0.50], P = 0.01), serum potassium levels (MD, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.24], P < 0.00001), and levels of the renal fibrosis indicator laminin (MD, -8.84 [95% CI, -11.93 to -5.75], P < 0.00001). However, for the effect of estimated glomerular filtration rate (MD, 1.74 [95% CI, -0.87 to 4.35], P = 0.19) and diastolic blood pressure (MD, -0.51 [95% CI, -1.58 to 0.57], P = 0.36), the differences between the two groups were not significant. In addition, no noticeable difference was identified in the adverse events of hyperkalemia and cough between them. These findings suggest that eplerenone exerts beneficial effects on DN by significantly reducing urinary albumin or protein excretion, SBP, and laminin levels, without increasing the incidence of hyperkalemia and other adverse events.
Background. In recent years, a large amount of clinical evidence and animal experiments have demonstrated the unique advantages of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) for treating chronic kidney disease (CKD). Aims. Accordingly, the present study aimed to systematically assess the second-generation selective MRAs eplerenone’s safety and effectiveness for treating CKD. Methods. Four databases (PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) correlated with eplerenone for treating CKD up to September 21, 2022. By complying with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature screening, and data extraction were conducted. Results. A total of 19 randomized controlled articles involving 4501 cases were covered. As suggested from the meta-analysis, significant differences were reported with the 24-h urine protein (MD = −42.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -76.72 to −7.73, P = 0.02), urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) (MD = −23.57, 95% CI = −29.28 to −17.86, P < 0.00001), the systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD = −2.73, 95% CI = −4.86 to −0.59, P = 0.01), and eGFR (MD = −1.56, 95% CI = −2.78 to −0.34, P = 0.01) in the subgroup of eplerenone vs placebo. The subgroups of eplerenone vs placebo (MD = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.18, P < 0.00001) and eplerenone vs thiazide diuretic (MD = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.23, P < 0.00001) showed the significantly increased potassium levels. However, no statistical significance was reported between the eplerenone treatment groups and the control in the effect exerted by serum creatinine (MD=0.03, 95% CI = −0.01 to 0.07, P = 0.12) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (MD = 0.11, 95% CI = −0.41 to 0.63, P = 0.68). Furthermore, significant risks of hyperkalemia were reported in the eplerenone group (K+ ≥ 5.5 mmol/l, RR = 1.70, 95%CI = 1.35 to 2.13, P =< 0.00001; K+ ≥ 6.0 mmol/l, RR = 1.61, 95% CIs = 1.06 to 2.44, P = 0.02), respectively. Conclusions. Eplerenone has beneficial effects on CKD by reducing urinary protein and the systolic blood pressure, but it also elevates the risk of hyperkalemia.
Background: In this study, we aimed to explore whether COL1A2 and miR-1297 participated in the progression of diabetic nephropathy (DN) in vitro and classified the underlying mechanisms.Methods: D-Glucose (30 mM; high glucose, HG)-stimulated HK-2 cells were used to mimic DN condition. RNA and non-coding RNA profiles were from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The interaction between miR-1297 and COL1A2 was measured by dual-luciferase reporter assay. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) method was conducted to analyse COL1A2-associated signalling pathways. The role of miR-1297/COL1A2 in biological behaviours of HG-induced HK-2 cells were analysed by cell counting kit-8 and apoptosis assays.Results: Bioinformatics analysis revealed that COL1A2 was up-regulated in DN tissues. We predicted and verified miR-1297 as the regulatory miRNA of COL1A2, and the expression of miR-1297 was decreased in DN tissues and HG-stimulated HK-2 cells. Overexpression of miR-1297 could promote cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis to protect HK-2 cells from HG-induced damage. And knockdown of COL1A2 enhanced the protective effects of miR-1297 on HG-stimulated HK-2 cells. GSEA results revealed that several inflammatory pathways were enriched in COL1A2 highexpression group. Meanwhile, transfection of miR-1297 reduced the phosphorylation of NFκB and expression of three important pro-inflammatory genes including cytokine CCL5, adhesion molecules ICAM1 and VCAM1 via targeting COL1A2. These results suggested that miR-1297 protected HG-treated HK-2 cells probably through suppressing inflammation via targeting COL1A2. Conclusion:This study sheds a light on the role miR-1297/COL1A2 in DN progression and provides a novel promising therapy strategy for suppressing DN progression.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.