Objective: We explored whether medical health workers had more psychosocial problems than nonmedical health workers during the COVID-19 outbreak. Methods
<b><i>Background:</i></b> Not all adults with chronic insomnia respond to the recommended therapeutic options of cognitive behavioral therapy and approved hypnotic drugs. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) may offer a novel potential treatment modality for insomnia. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of tACS for treating adult patients with chronic insomnia. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Sixty-two participants with chronic primary insomnia received 20 daily 40-min, 77.5-Hz, 15-mA sessions of active or sham tACS targeting the forehead and both mastoid areas in the laboratory on weekdays for 4 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4-week follow-up period. The primary outcome was response rate measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at week 8. Secondary outcomes were remission rate, insomnia severity, sleep onset latency (SOL), total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency, sleep quality, daily disturbances, and adverse events at the end of the 4-week intervention and at the 4-week follow-up. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 62 randomized patients, 60 completed the trial. During the 4-week intervention, 1 subject per group withdrew due to loss of interest and time restriction, respectively. Based on PSQI, at 4-week follow-up, the active group had a higher response rate compared to the sham group (53.4% [16/30] vs. 16.7% [5/30], <i>p</i> = 0.009), but remission rates were not different between groups. At the end of the 4-week intervention, the active group had higher response and remission rates than the sham group (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.026, respectively). During the trial, compared with the sham group, the active group showed a statistically significant decrease in PSQI total score, a shortened SOL, an increased TST, improved sleep efficiency, and improved sleep quality (<i>p</i> < 0.05 or <i>p</i> < 0.001). Post hoc analysis revealed that, in comparison with the sham group, the active group had improved symptoms, except for daily disturbances, at the end of the 4-week intervention, and significant improvements in all symptoms at the 4-week follow-up. No adverse events or serious adverse responses occurred during the study. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The findings show that the tACS applied in the present study has potential as an effective and safe intervention for chronic insomnia within 8 weeks.
<b><i>Background:</i></b> As the fight against the COVID-19 epidemic continues, medical workers may have allostatic load. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> During the reopening of society, medical and nonmedical workers were compared in terms of allostatic load. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An online study was performed; 3,590 Chinese subjects were analyzed. Socio-demographic variables, allostatic load, stress, abnormal illness behavior, global well-being, mental status, and social support were assessed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There was no difference in allostatic load in medical workers compared to nonmedical workers (15.8 vs. 17.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.22). Multivariate conditional logistic regression revealed that anxiety (OR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.18–1.31; <i>p</i> < 0.01), depression (OR = 1.23; 95% CI 1.17–1.29; <i>p</i> < 0.01), somatization (OR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.14–1.25; <i>p</i> < 0.01), hostility (OR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.18–1.30; <i>p</i> < 0.01), and abnormal illness behavior (OR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.34–1.66; <i>p</i> < 0.01) were positively associated with allostatic load, while objective support (OR = 0.84; 95% CI 0.78–0.89; <i>p</i> < 0.01), subjective support (OR = 0.84; 95% CI 0.80–0.88; <i>p</i> < 0.01), utilization of support (OR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.72–0.88; <i>p</i> < 0.01), social support (OR = 0.90; 95% CI 0.87–0.93; <i>p</i> < 0.01), and global well-being (OR = 0.30; 95% CI 0.22–0.41; <i>p</i> < 0.01) were negatively associated. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In the post-COVID-19 epidemic time, medical and nonmedical workers had similar allostatic load. Psychological distress and abnormal illness behavior were risk factors for it, while social support could relieve it.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.