Background Several autopsy and observational studies have investigated the link between mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to the well accepted yet rare occurrence of complex ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in this cohort. Few studies however have investigated whether arrhythmia burden and more importantly SCD are reduced following surgical correction of MVP. Purpose To investigate the impact of mitral valve surgery (MVS) (replacement or repair) on VA and SCD in patients with MVP. Methods A systematic review of the current literature was conducted using an electronic search of the PubMed database in October 2021. Studies were included if subjects had undergone mitral valve (MV) repair or replacement with documented rates of arrythmias/SCD pre- and post-intervention. Small patient numbers in individual reports precluded formal meta-analysis and results were reported on a per study basis. Results 19 identified studies (10 cohort studies, nine case studies) comprised 1322 patients with a pooled mean age of 63.4 years and 38.9% were female. 748 of the 1322 patients underwent MVS: 263 MV repair, 18 MV replacement (one with leaflet and papillary muscle excision), two MV repair with Maze procedure, 177 percutaneous transcatheter MV repair, 45 annuloplasty with or without valve repair, and in 243 cases the surgical method was not specified. Of the 10 included cohort studies, seven of the eight which investigated rates of VA post MVS concluded there was a significant reduction, while one reported the predisposition to arrythmia persisted after relieving the abnormal mechanical effects of non-ischaemic MR (75% due to MVP). One study reported a reduction in SCD post MVS. Each of the nine included case studies showed a reduction in VA post MVS. One study showed mitral annular disjunction (MAD) was independently associated with a higher risk of arrhythmic events, this link persisting with time dependent MVS although reduced compared to medical management. Conclusions The underlying mechanisms for VA and SCD associated with MVP are not completely understood, and guidelines for the surgical correction of MVP based on arrhythmic and SCD risk are lacking. This systematic review illustrates a possible reduction in VA following MVS. Further identification of patients at risk of SCD, and potential use of risk stratification algorithms, would allow for consideration of earlier management and appropriate use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) placement / MVS with an expected survival benefit. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
ObjectivesIn Australia, therapeutic interchange of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors could generate savings for patients and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). The PBS subsidises nine drugs in the ACE inhibitor class. These drugs are therapeutically equivalent, but the price varies between each drug. Patients are key players in successful therapeutic interchange programmes, but little is known about their views. This study aims to explore patient views of therapeutic interchange of ACE inhibitors in Australian primary care.DesignQualitative exploratory research study using semi-structured interviews, asking participants about therapeutic interchange and their attitude towards hypothetically switching ACE inhibitors. Data were analysed thematically.SettingAustralian primary care.ParticipantsFourteen adults in Australia currently taking an ACE inhibitor, recruited via general practices and pharmacies, social media and professional networks.FindingsFive key themes were identified: participants’ limited understanding of medication; the expectation that a new drug would be ‘the same’; the view that choice, convenience and fear of change outweigh the cost; altruism; and trust in health professionals, particularly participants’ own general practitioner (GP).ConclusionsPatients’ limited understanding of medication changes poses a barrier to therapeutic interchange. Clinicians should explore patients’ understanding and expectations of therapeutic interchange. Counselling from trusted health professionals, particularly GPs, could ameliorate concerns. Policymakers implementing therapeutic interchange programmes should ensure a trusted GP directs medication changes.
Medications form a significant portion of spending in primary health care. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) are among the most prescribed blood pressure medications in general practice. Medications within this class are considered therapeutically equivalent, but the cost of each ACE-I varies. Our aim was to explore cost and other factors that influence general practitioners (GPs) to prescribe a specific ACE-I and understand their views on therapeutic interchange within this drug class. We conducted a qualitative study of Australian GPs using thematic analysis. We found that GPs were aware of therapeutic equivalency within the ACE-I class, but unaware of the cost differences. Although GPs tended to adopt a prescribing preference, they were open to fewer prescribing options if there was a decreased cost to patients and the PBS, or potential to minimise prescribing error. Our findings have immediate relevance for national prescribing policies and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). The wide selection of ACE-Is that are available results in diverse prescribing patterns and may not be cost-effective for patients or the PBS. Restricting the number of drug options within the ACE-I class in primary care appears to be an acceptable drug cost-containment strategy according to our sample of GPs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.