PurposeWe conducted a literature-based meta-analysis of the risk of cardiovascular toxicities associated with MEK inhibitors.MethodsEligible trials included randomized phase II and III trials of patients with cancer who were given a mitogen activated protein (MAP)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) kinase (MEK) inhibitor (trametinib, selumetinib, or cobimetinib) and that described events of hypertension and decreased ejection fraction.ResultsOur search strategy yielded 300 potentially relevant citations from PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. After ineligible studies were excluded, a total of 10 clinical trials were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. The relative risk for all grades of hypertension was 1.54 (95% CI, 1.02 to 2.32; P = .05), 1.85 (95% CI, 1.01 to 3.40; P = .05) for high-grade hypertension, and 4.92 (95% CI, 2.93 to 8.25; P < .001) for decreased ejection fraction. Subgroup analysis revealed no difference between trametinib and selumetinib for risk of hypertension.ConclusionOur meta-analysis demonstrated that MEK inhibitor–based treatment is associated with an increased risk of all-grade and high-grade hypertension and asymptomatic decrease in ejection fraction. Clinicians should be aware of this risk and perform regular assessment.
Our meta-analysis has demonstrated that combination of MEK/BRAF inhibitors is associated with higher ORR, PFS and OS. However, this comes at the expense of a higher risk of selected toxicities.
Our meta-analysis has demonstrated that MEK inhibitor-based treatment is associated with an increased risk of all-grade and high-grade skin rash and acneiform dermatitis compared with control.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities associated with MEK inhibitors. Eligible studies included randomized Phase II and III trials of cancer patients on the three MEK inhibitors (trametinib, selumetinib and cobimetinib), describing events of stomatitis, diarrhea and vomiting. Our search strategy yielded 250 potentially relevant citations from Pubmed/Medline, Google scholar and CENTRAL Cochrane registry. After exclusion of ineligible studies, a total of 16 clinical trials were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. The relative risks of all-grade stomatitis, diarrhea and vomiting were 2.03 (95% CI 1.41-2.96; p = 0.002), 1.92 (95% CI 1.48-2.50; p < 0.00001) and 1.35 (95% CI 1.06-1.71; p = 0.01). Subgroup analyses according to agent used (trametinib vs Selumetinib), the regimen used (monotherapy vs combination) and the cancer treated (melanoma vs nonmelanoma) did not reveal any significant difference between the subgroups. Our meta-analysis has demonstrated that MEK inhibitor-based treatment is associated with an increased risk of stomatitis, diarrhea and vomiting compared to control. Clinicians should be aware of this risk and perform regular assessment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.