Accurate evaluation of the syndesmotic reduction can be determined intraoperatively using comparison mortise and talar dome lateral fluoroscopic images. Direct visualization of the syndesmosis or CT may not be necessary to achieve an accurate reduction in these injuries.

A subtrochanteric femur fracture after cannulated screw fixation of a femoral neck fracture is a devastating complication. We hypothesized that an apex-distal screw orientation would tolerate higher loads to subtrochanteric fracture. Human cadaveric femora were instrumented with three cannulated screws in either an apex-distal or an apex-proximal configuration. Specimens were loaded along the mechanical axis to failure creating a subtrochanteric femur fracture. Ultimate load to failure and the effect of bone density on load to failure were compared between groups. There was a greater load to failure in the apex-distal group compared with the apex-proximal group. The mean force to fracture in the apex-distal group (11,330 N; standard deviation = 3151 N) was greater than the mean force to fracture in the apex-proximal group (7795 N; standard deviation = 3194 N). Previous investigations have shown improved femoral neck fixation with an apex-distal configuration, but none has examined the relationship between screw orientation and subtrochanteric fractures. Our observations support the use of an apex-distal configuration for cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures.

Background: Previous retrospective research found that the presence or absence of bridging callus within 4 months postoperatively discriminated accurately between eventual union and nonunion of fractures of the tibial shaft. However, there remains no consensus regarding early prognostication of long bone nonunion. We prospectively assessed the accuracy and reliability of the presence of any bridging callus within 4 months in a cohort that was expanded to include both tibial and femoral shaft fractures. Methods: We identified 194 consecutive fractures of the shaft of the tibia (OTA/AO type 42-A, B, or C) and femur (OTA/AO type 32-A, B, or C) that were treated with intramedullary nailing. Exclusions for inadequate follow-up (55), extended delay prior to nailing (10), and skeletal immaturity (3) resulted in a study population of 126 fractures (56 tibiae and 70 femora) in 115 patients. Digital radiographs made between 3 and 4 months postoperatively were independently assessed by 3 orthopaedic traumatologists. The accuracy of assessment of the presence of any bridging callus, bicortical bridging, and tricortical bridging to predict union or nonunion was assessed with chi-square analysis and by interobserver reliability (kappa statistic). Results: The nonunion rate was 4% (5 of 126 fractures). The presence of any bridging callus by 4 months accurately predicted union (121 of 122 fractures) and its absence predicted nonunion (4 of 4 fractures). There was 1 incorrect prediction of union for a fracture that failed to unite (p < 0.001). Bicortical or greater bridging predicted union when present (116 of 116 fractures) and nonunion when absent (5 of 10 fractures), incorrectly predicting that 5 healing fractures would go on to nonunion (p < 0.001). Tricortical or greater bridging predicted union when present (103 of 103 fractures) and nonunion when absent (5 of 23 fractures), incorrectly predicting that 18 healing fractures would go on to nonunion (p < 0.001). Interobserver reliability was calculated for any bridging (kappa value, 0.91), bicortical bridging (kappa value, 0.79), tricortical bridging (kappa value, 0.71), and the exact number of cortices bridged (kappa value, 0.67). Conclusions: The presence of any bridging callus within 4 months accurately predicts the final healing outcome for tibial and femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. This criterion is simple and reliable, and only standard radiographs are needed to make the determination. Basing the prognosis on the bridging of additional cortices risks overestimation of the nonunion rate and is associated with relatively poor reliability.

Objectives: To assess the relationship between the distal nail target and postoperative alignment for distal tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: A single level 1 trauma center. Patients/Participants: One hundred thirty distal tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing over a 10-year period. Main Outcome Measurements: Malalignment >5 degrees. Results: Thirty-eight cases (29.2%) of malalignment >5 degrees included valgus (19 cases, 14.6%), procurvatum (13 cases, 10.0%), recurvatum (1 case, 0.8%), and combined valgus with procurvatum (5 cases, 3.8%). Medially directed nails demonstrated relative valgus (mean lateral distal tibia angle 86.4 vs. 89.4 degrees, P < 0.01) and more frequent coronal malalignment (24 of 78, 30.8% vs. 0 of 52, 0%, P < 0.01). Anteriorly directed nails demonstrated relative procurvatum (mean anterior distal tibia angle 82.8 vs. 80.9 degrees, P < 0.01) and more frequent sagittal malalignment (15 of 78, 19.2% vs. 3 of 52, 5.8%, P = 0.03). Malalignment was less common for nails targeting the central or slightly posterolateral plafond (0 of 30, 0% vs. 38 of 100, 38%), P < 0.01. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the distal nail target (P = 0.03), fracture within 5 cm of the plafond (P = 0.01), as well as night and weekend surgery (P = 0.03) were all independently associated with malalignment. Conclusions: Alignment of distal tibia fractures is sensitive to both injury and treatment factors. Nails should be targeted centrally or slightly posterolaterally to minimize malalignment. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.